The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although information criteria are computationally convenient, they are based on asymptotic results and assumptions about the data that may not always hold [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“WAIC is a more Bayesian approach to information criteria that adds a correction for the effective number of parameters [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033 · cited 1×
“There is also something called the Bayesian information criterion (a misleading name, we believe) that adjusts for the number of fitted parameters with a penalty that increases with the sample size, n (Schwarz 1978).”
BackgroundModel selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495 · cited 1×
“The log predictive density has an important role in statistical model comparison because of its connection to the Kullback-Leibler information measure (see Burnham and Anderson, 2002, and Robert, 1996).”
MethodGelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Self-citationPattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Ripley, B. D. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812651 · Cited by 6,500
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793 · cited 1×
“Examples include the quadratic, logarithmic, and zero-one scores, whose properties are reviewed by Gneiting and Raftery (2007).”
BackgroundGroot, M. D. (1970) · doi:10.2307/2987329 · Cited by 4,527 · cited 2×
“In this asymptotic limit, the posterior is dominated by the likelihood—the prior contributes only one factor, while the likelihood contributes n factors, one for each data point—and so the likelihood function also approaches the same normal distribution.”
BackgroundHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118 · cited 1×
“When several candidate models are available, they can be compared and averaged using Bayes factors (which is equivalent to embedding them in a larger discrete model) or some more practical approximate procedure (Hoeting et al., 1999) or continuous model expansion (Draper, 1999).”
MethodInformation Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 · Cited by 3,028 · cited 5×
“For practical reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWatanabe, S. (2010) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953045 · Cited by 2,921 · cited 5×
“Bayesian cross-validation works also with singular models, and Bayesian LOO-CV has been proven to asymptotically equal to WAIC (Watanabe, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn
Brix, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00347_4.x · Cited by 2,588 · cited 3×
“As is well known in hierarchical modeling (see, e.g., Spiegelhalter et al. 2002; Gelman et al. 2003), the line separating prior distribution from likelihood is somewhat arbitrary and is related to the question of what aspects of the data will be changed in hypothetical replications.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Draper, D.: Model uncertainty yes, discrete model averaging maybe. Stat. Sci. 14, 405–409 (1999)
- Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York (1993) · DOI · Paper page
- Gelman, A., Meng, X.L., Stern, H.S.: Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion). Stat. Sin. 6, 733–807 (1996)
- Watanabe, S.: Algebraic Geometry and Statistical Learning Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,008 of 1,008
Khan, K., Luo, H., & Xi, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.01285 · Cited by 2
“There are several popular model selection criteria defined in R-INLA, including the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (WAIC) 47;48 .”
Bayesian logistic regression: An application for carbonisation damage in four wood species
Vasconcelos, J. S., Vasconcelos, J. C. S., dos Santos, D. P., Villegas, C. M., Araújo, V. A. D., & Biaggioni, M. A. M. (2021) · Wood Material Science and Engineering · doi:10.1080/17480272.2021.1992649 · Cited by 1
“WAIC is a fully Bayesian approach for estimating the out-of-sample expectation, starting with the computed log pointwise posterior predictive density and then adding a correction for effective number of parameters to adjust for overfitting (Gelman et al., 2014).”
MethodEarly Hatch and Managed Native Grasslands Minorly Improve Bobwhite Juvenile Body Condition
Sinnott, E. A., Weegman, M. D., Thompson, F., & Thompson, T. R. (2021) · The American midland naturalist · doi:10.1674/0003-0031-186.2.231
Spatial analysis of stomach and liver cancers in California
Fisher, G., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Annals of Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.21037/ace-19-21
Sant'anna, A., Pereira, J. L., Abreu, M., de Moura, A. M. A., Aniceto, E. S., Motta, J., & Glória, L. (2021) · Research, Society and Development · doi:10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19317
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Random Effect for Analyzing Cyclist Crash Severity
Rezapour, M., & Ksaibati, K. (2021) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals2030032
“tions by using first log pointwise posterior predictive density and then using the correction of the effective number of parameters for overfitting adjustment [23].”
BackgroundMethodCastel, C., Sommen, C., Chatignoux, E., Strat, Y. L., & Alioum, A. (2021) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.1515/ijb-2021-0030
The ROCK Tool: A Novel Method for the Structural Exploration of Schemata
Shi, B., Jiang, Z. J., Zhou, J., & Chen, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675938
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelman, A., Hwang, J., & Vehtari, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Gelman, Andrew
- Venue
- Statistics and Computing
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 997-1016
- ISSN
- 0960-3174 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1375
- OpenAlex
- W2130902307
- Cited by
- 2,104
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 266 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 45.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Statistics and Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Institute of Education Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- information criteria, Akaike information criterion, deviance information criterion, Bayesian model selection, out-of-sample prediction error, bias correction, model comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review