The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Although information criteria are computationally convenient, they are based on asymptotic results and assumptions about the data that may not always hold [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“WAIC is a more Bayesian approach to information criteria that adds a correction for the effective number of parameters [89].”
From Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033 · cited 1×
“There is also something called the Bayesian information criterion (a misleading name, we believe) that adjusts for the number of fitted parameters with a penalty that increases with the sample size, n (Schwarz 1978).”
BackgroundModel selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495 · cited 1×
“The log predictive density has an important role in statistical model comparison because of its connection to the Kullback-Leibler information measure (see Burnham and Anderson, 2002, and Robert, 1996).”
MethodGelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Self-citationPattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Ripley, B. D. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812651 · Cited by 6,500
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793 · cited 1×
“Examples include the quadratic, logarithmic, and zero-one scores, whose properties are reviewed by Gneiting and Raftery (2007).”
BackgroundGroot, M. D. (1970) · doi:10.2307/2987329 · Cited by 4,527 · cited 2×
“In this asymptotic limit, the posterior is dominated by the likelihood—the prior contributes only one factor, while the likelihood contributes n factors, one for each data point—and so the likelihood function also approaches the same normal distribution.”
BackgroundHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118 · cited 1×
“When several candidate models are available, they can be compared and averaged using Bayes factors (which is equivalent to embedding them in a larger discrete model) or some more practical approximate procedure (Hoeting et al., 1999) or continuous model expansion (Draper, 1999).”
MethodInformation Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38 · Cited by 3,028 · cited 5×
“For practical reasons alone, there remains a place for simple bias corrections such as AIC (Akaike, 1973), DIC (Spiegelhalter et al., 2002, van der Linde, 2005), and, more recently, WAIC (Watanabe, 2010), and all these can be viewed as approximations to different versions of cross-validation (Stone,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWatanabe, S. (2010) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953045 · Cited by 2,921 · cited 5×
“Bayesian cross-validation works also with singular models, and Bayesian LOO-CV has been proven to asymptotically equal to WAIC (Watanabe, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn
Brix, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00347_4.x · Cited by 2,588 · cited 3×
“As is well known in hierarchical modeling (see, e.g., Spiegelhalter et al. 2002; Gelman et al. 2003), the line separating prior distribution from likelihood is somewhat arbitrary and is related to the question of what aspects of the data will be changed in hypothetical replications.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Draper, D.: Model uncertainty yes, discrete model averaging maybe. Stat. Sci. 14, 405–409 (1999)
- Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York (1993) · DOI · Paper page
- Gelman, A., Meng, X.L., Stern, H.S.: Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies (with discussion). Stat. Sin. 6, 733–807 (1996)
- Watanabe, S.: Algebraic Geometry and Statistical Learning Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,008
Adde, A., Amat, C. C., Mazerolle, M., Darveau, M., Cumming, S., & O'Hara, R. (2021) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3790 · Cited by 20
Borsci, S., & Schmettow, M. (2024) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-024-01834-4 · Cited by 30
“Using information criteria, all models are then ranked by predictive accuracy [41].”
Barrile, G., Cross, P., Stewart, C., Malmberg, J. L., Jakopak, R. P., Binfet, J., Monteith, K., Werner, B. B., Jennings-Gaines, J. E., & Merkle, J. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11418 · Cited by 19
“ELPD indicates how much credence the model ascribes to out- of-sample data and hence is a relative index of predictive performance (Gelman et al., 2014 ).”
BackgroundCommunity stability is related to animal diversity change
Jarzyna, M. A., Norman, K., LaMontagne, J. M., Helmus, M. R., Li, D., Parker, S. M., Rocha, M. P., Record, S., Sokol, E. R., Zarnetske, P. L., et al. (2022) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3970 · Cited by 19
Guerrieri, A., Carteron, A., Bonin, A., Marta, S., Ambrosini, R., Caccianiga, M., Cantera, I., Compostella, C., Diolaiuti, G., Fontaneto, D., et al. (2022) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16669 · Cited by 19
“We used the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) to compare models with and without interactions (Gelman, Hwang, & Vehtari, 2013).”
MethodModeling Touch Point Distribution with Rotational Dual Gaussian Model
Ma, Y., Zhai, S., Ramakrishnan, I. V., & Bi, X. (2021) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3472749.3474816 · Cited by 17
“We first compared the prediction accuracy of the Rotational Dual Gaussian model with the original Dual Gaussian model using the Widely Applicable Information Criterion (WAIC) [14].”
MethodInfluentialEstimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning
Dhir, A., Diaconu, C.-D., Lungu, V., Requeima, J., Turner, R. E., & van der Wilk, M. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05526 · Cited by 18
Ryan, G., van Eerten, H. V., Troja, E., Piro, L., O'Connor, B., & Ricci, R. (2024) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a14 · Cited by 18
Flexible cloglog links for binomial regression models as an alternative for imbalanced medical data
Alves, J., Bazán, J. L., & Arellano-Valle, R. (2022) · Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1002/bimj.202100325 · Cited by 18
Finite-dimensional Discrete Random Structures and Bayesian Clustering
Lijoi, A., Prünster, I., & Rigon, T. (2022) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2022.2149406 · Cited by 18
Mozdzen, A., Cremaschi, A., Cadonna, A., Guglielmi, A., & Kastner, G. (2022) · Spatial Statistics · doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100715 · Cited by 16
Luo, J., Dong, J., Tan, Z., Zhang, H., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.113991 · Cited by 17
Fajardo, A., Siefert, A., & Laughlin, D. C. (2023) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.14240 · Cited by 25
“We also calculated the Widely Applicable Information Criterion (WAIC) of each model to compare their expected predictive accuracy on out- of-sample data (Gelman et al., 2014 ).”
MethodLocal climate modulates the development of soil nematode communities after glacier retreat
Guerrieri, A., Cantera, I., Marta, S., Bonin, A., Carteron, A., Ambrosini, R., Caccianiga, M., Anthelme, F., Azzoni, R., Almond, P. C., et al. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.17057 · Cited by 17
“We used the widely applicable information criterion to compare models with and without interactions (Gelman et al., 2014 ).”
MethodChen, P., Zhang, S., Zhao, K., Kang, X., Rittman, T., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148675 · Cited by 19
Evaluation of predictive capability of Bayesian spatio-temporal models for Covid-19 spread
Lawson, A. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-01997-3 · Cited by 17
“The WAIC is a standard relative goodness-of-fit criterion and is now replacing the commonly used deviance Information criterion (DIC) as it can be stably estimated within McMC applications [12].”
MethodCepeda-Duque, J. C., Andrade-Ponce, G. P., Montes-Rojas, A., Rendón-Jaramillo, U., López-Velasco, V., Arango-Correa, E., López-Barrera, Á., Mazariegos, L. A., Lizcano, D. D., Link, A., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288247 · Cited by 17
“This process is repeated for each data point to obtain an estimate of the model’s predictive accuracy [64].”
BackgroundSalvage Logging Strongly Affects Woodpecker Abundance and Reproduction: a Meta-analysis
Basile, M., Krištín, A., Mikusiński, G., Thorn, S., Żmihorski, M., Pasinelli, G., & Brockerhoff, E. (2022) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-022-00175-w · Cited by 17
Escudero, P., Smit, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2022) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci12121618 · Cited by 17
“We used weakly informative priors [55,56] with a Student-t’s distribution with 3 degrees of freedom, a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 2.”
MethodRange and extinction dynamics of the steppe bison in Siberia: A pattern‐oriented modelling approach
Pilowsky, J., Haythorne, S., Brown, S. C., Krapp, M., Armstrong, E., Brook, B. W., Rahbek, C., & Fordham, D. A. (2022) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13601 · Cited by 18
“Posterior predictive checks were done to determine whether the posterior distributions resulted in a good resemblance between simulated and observed data (Gelman et al., 2014).”
MethodUdell, B., Martin, J., Romagosa, C., Waddle, H., Johnson, F., Falk, B., Adams, A. Y. Y., Funck, S., Ketterlin, J. K., Suarez, E., et al. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9173 · Cited by 17
Ballester, L., Alayo, I., Vilagut, G., Mortier, P., Almenara, J., Cebrià, A. I., Echeburúa, E., Gabilondo, A., Gili, M., Lagares, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.135 · Cited by 21
Long‐term monitoring in endangered woodlands shows effects of multi‐scale drivers on bird occupancy
Hingee, K., Westgate, M., & Lindenmayer, D. (2022) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14353 · Cited by 17
Khodabakhshi, A., & Ahmed, M. M. (2022) · Journal of Transportation Safety & Security · doi:10.1080/19439962.2022.2048761 · Cited by 17
Fernandez, P. M., Spitz, J., Dars, C., Dabin, W., Mahfouz, C., André, J., Chouvelon, T., Authier, M., & Caurant, F. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133676 · Cited by 17
Ripley, S., Minet, L., Zalzal, J., Pollitt, K. J. G., Gao, D., Lakey, P., Shiraiwa, M., Maher, B., Hatzopoulou, M., & Weichenthal, S. (2021) · Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05364 · Cited by 17
FIFA ranking: Evaluation and path forward
Szczecinski, L., & Roatis, I.-I. (2021) · Journal of Sports Analytics · doi:10.3233/jsa-200619 · Cited by 17
Lion and spotted hyena distributions within a buffer area of the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem
Mwampeta, S. B., Wilton, C. M., Mkasanga, I. J., Masinde, L. M., Ranke, P. S., Røskaft, E., Fyumagwa, R., & Belant, J. L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01518-6 · Cited by 18
Haddad, K. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17071095 · Cited by 16
“Techniques like Bayesian neural networks and hierarchical Bayesian models are increasingly used to merge hydrological data with socioeconomic factors, enabling the assessment of water availability, agricultural productivity, and flood risk in a socio-environmental context [238–240].”
Effati, M., & Ramezanpoor, A. (2025) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2025.108005 · Cited by 15
Na, W., & Liu, S. (2024) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114581 · Cited by 17
Georgiou, G. P., & Giannakou, A. (2024) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-024-10038-z · Cited by 16
“…model including its ability to deal with small samples of participants (see Escudero et al., 2020; Georgiou, 2023b; van Weakly informative priors were used, namely, student’s t -distribution with 3 degrees of freedom, a mean of 0, and a standard deviation of 2.5 (see Gelman et al., 2014, 2015).”
MethodInfluentialSánchez-Balseca, J., Piñeiros, J. L., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2023) · Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113831 · Cited by 16
Personalised regional modelling predicts tau progression in the human brain
Chaggar, P., Vogel, J. W., Binette, A. P., Thompson, T., Strandberg, O. T., Mattsson, N., Karlsson, L., Stomrud, E., Jbabdi, S., Magon, S., et al. (2025) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003241 · Cited by 19
“The ELPD is used for estimating the out-of-sample predictive accuracy and is adapted from [69].”
Methods for estimating no‐effect toxicity concentrations in ecotoxicology
Fisher, R., Fox, D., Negri, A., van Dam, J. V., Flores, F., & Koppel, D. (2023) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4809 · Cited by 16
“However, there are potentially much better weighting strategies available for Bayesian model fi ts (Gelman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRaymond, M., Turek, D. B., Durand, V., Nila, S., Suryobroto, B., Vadez, J., Barthès, J., Apostoulou, M., & Crochet, P. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.02.22.481477 · Cited by 16
“These functions describing the OBE effect were compared by evaluating model fit to the sibling data using WAIC (Gelman et al., 2014; Watanabe, 2013): the mean of ten independent chains was used, each with a length of 20,000 samples and a”
MethodInfluentialLiu, Q., Zhong, R., Ji, X., Law, S., Xiao, F., Wei, Y., Fang, S., Kong, X., Zhang, X., Yao, S., et al. (2022) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23291 · Cited by 20
“The LOOIC is an index of out‐of‐sample prediction accuracy based on a fitted Bayesian model derived from the log‐likelihood estimated from a posterior distribution (Gelman et al., 2014; Vehtari et al., 2017).”
MethodA Review and Roadmap of Deep Learning Causal Discovery in Different Variable ParadigmsPreprint
Chen, H., Du, K., Yang, X., & Li, C. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.06367 · Cited by 15
“Based on the directed acyclic graph (DAG) [22], [23] structure and Bayesian models [24], [25], it aims to learn the statistical relationship between two observed variables under the influence of another variable.”
BackgroundBayesian beta regression for bounded responses with unknown supports
Zhou, H., & Huang, X.-Z. (2022) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2021.107345 · Cited by 16
Spatial voting models in circular spaces: A case study of the U.S. House of Representatives
Yu, X., & Rodríguez, A. (2021) · Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/21-aoas1454 · Cited by 16
“To conclude this Section, we present in Table 4 the value of the Watanabe-Akaike Information Criteria (WAIC, see Watanabe, 2010, 2013; Gelman et al., 2014) associated with both the circular and one-dimensional Euclidean models fitted to the data from 100th to 116th U.”
MethodInfluentialAccelerated failure time models for recurrent event data analysis and joint modeling
Khan, S. A., & Basharat, N. (2021) · Computational statistics (Zeitschrift) · doi:10.1007/s00180-021-01171-7 · Cited by 16
“Bayesian inference is carried out by MCMC, where we sample from the posterior distribution by the HamiltonianMonte Carlo algorithm (Gelman et al. 2013).”
MethodHuman-wildlife conflict is amplified during periods of drought
Calhoun, K. L., Smith, J. A., Tingley, M. W., Heeren, A., Scoyoc, A. V., Serota, M. W., Brashares, J. S., & Furnas, B. J. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adx0286 · Cited by 19
“We ran all models for 70,000 iterations, with a 10,000-iteration burn-in across three chains and used NIMBLE custom samplers to increase the efficiency of MCMC mixing ( 65 ).”
Converting carbonyl index values in microplastics studies.
Yang, Z.-J., & Arakawa, H. (2025) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179182 · Cited by 15
Sarah, S., Shah, W., Somers, L., Deshpande, R. D., & Ahmed, S. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131763 · Cited by 15
Applying SEM, Exploratory SEM, and Bayesian SEM to Personality Assessments
Hong, H., Vispoel, W. P., & Martinez, A. J. (2024) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych6010007 · Cited by 19
“In contrast, the application of traditional cutoff values for BCFI and BTLI is not endorsed by Garnier-Villarreal and Jorgensen (2020) [54] because the criteria were not applicable to all samples.”
MethodRees, E., Batista, M. L., Kama, M., Kucharski, A., Lau, C. L., & Lowe, R. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002400 · Cited by 15
“Models with a lower WAIC indicate a more parsimonious model [43].”
MethodÖn, Z. (2023) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108163 · Cited by 15
Hydrology is a major influence on amphibian abundance in a large European floodplain
Hamer, A., Czeglédi, I., Gál, B., Sály, P., Szalóky, Z., Preiszner, B., & Erős, T. (2023) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/fwb.14104 · Cited by 15
“The nine models were compared using the Watanabe– Akaike information criterion (WAIC; Watanabe, 2010 ), computed by the meth-ods of Gelman et al. ( 2014 ).”
MethodPopulation dynamics and harvest management of eastern mallards
Roberts, A. J., Hostetler, J. A., Stiller, J., Devers, P., & Link, W. (2023) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22405 · Cited by 15
Transferability of Alzheimer's disease progression subtypes to an independent population cohort
Chen, H., Young, A. L., Oxtoby, N. P., Barkhof, F., Alexander, D. C., & Altmann, A. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120005 · Cited by 19
Context dependency in interference competition among birds in an endangered woodland ecosystem
Lindenmayer, D., Blanchard, W., Evans, M., Beggs, R., Lavery, T., Florance, D., Crane, C., Smith, D., Siegrist, A., Lang, E., et al. (2023) · Diversity and Distributions: A journal of biological invasions and biodiversity · doi:10.1111/ddi.13680 · Cited by 15
Random effects in dynamic network actor models
Uzaheta, A., Amati, V., & Stadtfeld, C. (2023) · Network Science · doi:10.1017/nws.2022.37 · Cited by 11
“The information criteria mentioned above aim to estimate the expected out-of-sample error using a bias-corrected adjustment of within-sample error (Gelman et al., 2014).”
MethodRoundtrip, free-floating and peer-to-peer carsharing: A Bayesian behavioral analysis
Ramos, É. M. S., Mattos, D. I., & Bergstad, C. J. (2023) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103577 · Cited by 17
Analysis of spatial and temporal impact differences of birth rate in mainland China
Zhang, J., Ding, S., & Hu, X. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22403-w · Cited by 14
Effect of transit-oriented design on pedestrian and cyclist safety using bivariate spatial models.
Singh, M., Zhang, Y.-P., Cheng, W., Li, Y.-H., & Clay, E. R. (2022) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.012 · Cited by 15
Inácio, V., & Garrido-Guillen, J. E. (2022) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9480 · Cited by 15
Non-Separable Spatio-Temporal Models via Transformed Multivariate Gaussian Markov Random Fields
Prates, M. O., Azevedo, D. R. M., MacNab, Y. C., & Willig, M. R. (2022) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/rssc.12567 · Cited by 12
“A broader discussion of these criteria can be found in Gelman et al. (2014).”
BackgroundElevation, disturbance, and forest type drive the occurrence of a specialist arboreal folivore
Lindenmayer, D., McBurney, L., Blanchard, W., Marsh, K. J., Bowd, E., Watchorn, D., Taylor, C., & Youngentob, K. N. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265963 · Cited by 15
“We chose the most parsimonious model, that is, the simplest model within two LOOIC units of the best fitting model.”
MethodInfluentialTwo faces of perceptual awareness during the attentional blink: Gradual and discrete.
Karabay, A., Wilhelm, S. A., de Jong, J., Wang, J., Martens, S., & Akyürek, E. G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001156 · Cited by 20
“WAIC penalizes models on the number of free parameters in a modest manner and lower WAIC scores indicate better fi t (Gelman et al., 2014).”
MethodSultaire, S. M., Humphreys, J. M., Zuckerberg, B., Pauli, J., & Roloff, G. (2021) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14279 · Cited by 15
Dimension-Grouped Mixed Membership Models for Multivariate Categorical Data
Gu, Y.-Q., Erosheva, E., Xu, G.-J., & Dunson, D. (2021) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.11705 · Cited by 15
“Gelman et al. (2014) contains a comprehensive review of various predictive information criteria for evaluating Bayesian models.”
Yang, A.-N., Yang, J., Yang, D., Xu, R.-T., He, Y., Aragon, A., & Qiu, H. (2021) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2021gh000494 · Cited by 15
“Particularly, several studies have suggested that the usage of public parks and open spaces were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemics and its NPI policies (Gelman et al., 2014; Shoari et al., 2020; Volenec et al., 2021; Xie et al., 2020).”
BackgroundLavelle-Hill, R. E., Smith, G., & Murayama, K. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251345696 · Cited by 11
“Other methods include Bayesian estimation (Gelman et al., 2014) and inverse probability weighting (L. Li et al., 2013; Seaman & White, 2013).”
Chávez, D. V., Palacios, D., Laninga-Wijnen, L., Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C., Berger, C., & Kanacri, B. P. L. (2024) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z · Cited by 14
“Multiple sequences produced independently for assessing convergence were estimated (Gelman et al., 2014).”
The motive cocktail in altruistic behaviors
Wu, X., Ren, X., Liu, C., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00685-6 · Cited by 21
Efficient estimation and correction of selection-induced bias with order statistics
McLatchie, Y., & Vehtari, A. (2023) · Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-024-10442-4 · Cited by 14
“Such procedures are able to produce an almost unbiased estimate of a model’s predictive ability (Watanabe 2010), and have been reviewed extensively by Arlot and Celisse (2010), and by Gelman et al. (2014) in a Bayesian context.”
Self-citationWang, X., Zhang, S., Gasperi, L., Robertson, S. J., & Gómez, M. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113698 · Cited by 13
Wang, H., den Daas, C., de Coul, E. O., & Jonas, K. J. (2023) · Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.sste.2023.100577 · Cited by 13
The effects of induced positive and negative affect on Pavlovian-instrumental interactions
Weber, I. D., Zorowitz, S., Niv, Y., & Bennett, D. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2109600 · Cited by 14
Etienne, L., Franck, P., Lavigne, C., Papaix, J. J., Tolle, P., Ostandie, N., & Rusch, A. (2022) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.107967 · Cited by 17
“It was acceptable for all of the parameters (R 1.1, Gelman et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialAssociation of Poor Mental-Health Days With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the U.S.
Ransome, Y., Luan, H., Song, I., Fiellin, D., & Galea, S. (2021) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.032 · Cited by 14
“The Watanabe−Akaike Information Criterion was used to compare model fit; a lower value indicates better model fit.(28) This study used county-level data and therefore is not considered Human Subjects Research, and was thus is exempt based on the guidelines from Yale University Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
MethodLiao, B.-C., Karim, E., & Zhang, K. (2021) · Regional Studies in Marine Science · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2021.102026 · Cited by 14
Kovacs, K., Citta, J., Brown, T., Dietz, R., Ferguson, S., Harwood, L., Houde, M., Lea, E., Quakenbush, L., Rigét, F., et al. (2021) · Polar Research · doi:10.33265/polar.v40.5753 · Cited by 14
“DIC is the information criterion used for most Bayesian analyses (Gelman et al. 2014).”
MethodMen, T., Liu, B., Li, Y.-F., Lin, Y.-H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2023.3315294 · Cited by 13
“Bayesian inference techniques, such as Markov chain Monte Carlo, can estimate missing values and model parameters, given the observed data [48].”
MethodA multiple criteria Bayesian hierarchical model for analyzing heterogeneous consumer preferences
Liu, J.-P., Wang, Y., Kadziński, M., Mao, X., & Rao, Y. (2024) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103113 · Cited by 13
Affect-congruent attention modulates generalized reward expectations
Bennett, D., Radulescu, A., Zorowitz, S., Felso, V., & Niv, Y. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011707 · Cited by 17
Comparing DIC and WAIC for multilevel models with missing data
Du, H., Keller, B. T., Alacam, E., & Enders, C. K. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02231-0 · Cited by 16
First VLTI/GRAVITY Observations of HIP 65426 b: Evidence for a Low or Moderate Orbital Eccentricity
Blunt, S., Balmer, W., Wang, J.-J., Lacour, S., Petrus, S., Bourdarot, G., Kammerer, J., Pourré, N., Rickman, E., Shangguan, J., et al. (2023) · Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad06b7 · Cited by 13
Blaszczak, J., Yackulic, C., Shriver, R., & Hall, R. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.04.11.535773 · Cited by 13
Finley, A., Andersen, H., Babcock, C., Cook, B., Morton, D., & Banerjee, S. (2023) · Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics · doi:10.1007/s13253-024-00611-3 · Cited by 13
“Two WAIC criteria were computed based on the log pointwise predictive density (LPPD) with WAIC 1 = − 2 ( LLPD − p 1 ) and WAIC 2 = − 2 ( LLPD − p 2 ) where penalty terms p 1 and p 2 are defined in Gelman et al. (2014) just prior to, and in, their Eq.”
Inácio, V., & Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. (2022) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/21-sts839 · Cited by 13
“…Bayesian bootstrap (Rubin, 1981), whose samples correspond to discrete distributions supported at {U (s)Dj} nD j=1 with weights, assuming no ties in the realisations of the diseased placement values, distributed according to a Dirichlet(nD; 1, . . . , 1) distribution (Gelman et al., 2013, p. 548).”
MethodThe Use of a Log-Normal Prior for the Student t-Distribution
Lee, S. (2022) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms11090462 · Cited by 13
Feng, Y.-T., Mignan, A., Sornette, D., & Li, J. (2022) · Seismological Research Letters · doi:10.1785/0220210368 · Cited by 13
Adrakey, H. K., Malembic-Maher, S., Rusch, A., Ay, J., Riley, L., Ramalanjaona, L., & Fabre, F. (2022) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-10-21-0449-r · Cited by 13
“We estimated the Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (Gelman et al. 2014; Watanabe 2010), which penalizes model complexity, and the deviance information criterion (Spiegelhalter et al. 2002) to compare all the models fi tted.”
MethodRöver, C., Sturtz, S., Lilienthal, J., Bender, R., & Friede, T. (2023) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9731 · Cited by 14
Luna‐Nieves, A. L., González, E. J., Cortés‐Flores, J., Ibarra-Manríquez, G., Maldonado‐Romo, A., & Meave, J. (2022) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.13072 · Cited by 13
Using piecewise regression to identify biological phenomena in biotelemetry datasets
Wolfson, D. W., Andersen, D. E., & Fieberg, J. (2022) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13779 · Cited by 20
“The predictive performance of multiple models can be compared with leave-one-out cross validation (LOO-CV), either using WAIC (Widely Applicable Information Criterion) or ELPD (Expected Log Predictive Density), which can be calculated with the loo package (Gelman et al., 2014; Vehtari et al., 2017).”
MethodFast and Scalable Spike and Slab Variable Selection in High-Dimensional Gaussian ProcessesPreprint
Dance, H., & Paige, B. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.04558 · Cited by 13
“Moreover, the LOO-LPD is more robust against overfitting and model mis-specification than the log evidence (Jankowiak and Pleiss, 2021; Gelman et al., 2014).”
Low, T., McCrindle, B. W., Mueller, B., Fan, C. S., Somerset, E., O’Shea, S., Tsuji, L. J. S., Chen, H., & Manlhiot, C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93089-9 · Cited by 16
How do ecologists estimate occupancy in practice?
Goldstein, B. R., Keller, A. G., Calhoun, K. L., Barker, K. J., Montealegre‐Mora, F., Serota, M. W., Scoyoc, A. V., Parker‐Shames, P., Andreozzi, C. L., & de Valpine, P. (2024) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.07402 · Cited by 12
Sakamoto, M., Ullah, S. M. A., & Tani, M. (2024) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106729 · Cited by 12
Davis, A. K., Croy, J. R., & Snyder, W. E. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2410410121 · Cited by 15
“We then compared a suite of models we deemed plausible using the widely applicable information criteria (WAIC), which approximates out of sample prediction error (70).”
Coventry, B. S., & Bartlett, E. L. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0484-23.2024 · Cited by 16
“Model comparisons can be performed in many ways, but a common paradigm is the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO; Gelman et al., 2014).”
Petersen, J., Friis-Hansen, L., Bryndorf, T., Jensen, A. K., Andersen, A., & Løkkegaard, E. (2023) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-023-01323-8 · Cited by 12
“Women > 35 years were namely at risk in the earliest part of the pregnancy but also showed and overall increased risk (aOR 7.5, 95% CI [2.3; 26], p < 0.01) while 30–35-years old had the same odds of miscarriage as younger women.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMartínez-Minaya, J., & Rue, H. (2023) · Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-024-10427-3 · Cited by 12
“…measures such the Deviance Information Criteria (Spiegelhalter et al. 2002, DIC), the Watanabe Akaike information criterion (Watanabe and Opper 2010; Gelman et al. 2014, WAIC), or the cross-validation measure conditional predictive ordinate (CPO) for evaluating the predictive capacity (Pettit…”
Zarzar, C. A., Fernandes, T. J., & de Oliveira, I. D. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102271 · Cited by 12
Mancini, G., Mastrantonio, G., Pollice, A., Lasinio, G. J., Belluscio, A., Casoli, E., Pace, D. S., Ardizzone, G., & Ventura, D. (2023) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110209 · Cited by 12
Bayesian Estimation of Latent Space Item Response Models with JAGS, Stan, and NIMBLE in R
Luo, J., Carolis, L. D., Zeng, B., & Jeon, M. (2023) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych5020027 · Cited by 11
“For illustration purposes, here we show how model fit indices can be produced, such as Watanabe–Akaike or Widely Applicable Information Criterion (WAIC) [48] and Log Pointwise Predictive Density (LPPD) [49] (Listing 12).”
BackgroundMethodGarcia-Fogeda, I., Besbassi, H., Larivière, Y., Ogunjimi, B., Abrams, S., & Hens, N. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.030 · Cited by 12
Gilbert, B., Fiksel, J., Wilson, E., Kalter, H., Kante, A., Akum, A., Blau, D. M., Bassat, Q., Macicame, I., Gudo, E. S., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.22-0319 · Cited by 12
“22 WAIC also harmonizes well with Bayesian inference, making use of the entire posterior distribution available from the Markov Chain Monte Carlo runs.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelman, A., Hwang, J., & Vehtari, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Gelman, Andrew
- Venue
- Statistics and Computing
- Published
- 2013-08-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 997-1016
- ISSN
- 0960-3174 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1375
- OpenAlex
- W2130902307
- Cited by
- 2,104
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 202 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 266 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 45.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Statistics and Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Institute of Education Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- information criteria, Akaike information criterion, deviance information criterion, Bayesian model selection, out-of-sample prediction error, bias correction, model comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review