Cited by 66Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

A survey of local differential privacy for securing internet of vehicles

Zhao, Ping, Zhang, Guanglin, Wan, Shaohua, Liu, Gaoyang, Umer, Tariq·2020·The Journal of Supercomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11227-019-03104-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, P., Zhang, G., Wan, S., Liu, G., & Umer, T.
Affiliations
  • Donghua University (CN)
  • Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Wan, Shaohua
Venue
The Journal of Supercomputing
Published
2019-12-09
Volume
76
Issue
11
Pages
8391-8412
ISSN
  • 0920-8542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0484
OpenAlex
W2996626025
Cited by
66
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Supercomputing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
local differential privacy, Internet of Vehicles, vehicle data privacy, privacy preservation, differential privacy, untrusted third party, privacy-utility trade-off, computational cost, connected vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review