The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“epistemic injustice related to AI is a growing concern.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“The opacity of the process [20] leading to the outcome makes the assessment of the truthfulness of the outcome uncertain.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Objective Knowledge, an Evolutionary Approach.
Ruja, H., & Popper, K. R. (1973) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106696 · Cited by 3,782
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,321
Rudolf, R. (1998) · Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks · doi:10.28937/978-3-7873-2358-6 · Cited by 1,073
Leftow, B., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (1996) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil19961323 · Cited by 765
On proof and progress in mathematics
Thurston, W. P. H. (1994) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1994-00502-6 · Cited by 655
Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction
Mermin, N. D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813870 · Cited by 592
Humphreys, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195158709.001.0001 · Cited by 559
Self-citationExtending ourselves: computational science, empiricism, and scientific method
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0272 · Cited by 487
van Fraassen, B. C. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127966 · Cited by 377
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bedau M. (1997) Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–399
- Costas, H.-A. (forthcoming). Review of Humphreys [2004], Mind.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 · Cited by 1,229
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786
Durán, J. M., & Jongsma, K. R. (2021) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106820 · Cited by 446
Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Zednik, C. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7 · Cited by 419
Hatherley, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105935 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphreys, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Humphreys, Paul
- Venue
- Synthese
- Published
- 2008-11-28
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 615-626
- ISSN
- 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0964
- OpenAlex
- W2055250996
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 28.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Synthese (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- computer simulation, scientific computing, scientific method, philosophy of science, epistemology of simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
