Cited by 362Philosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationLogic and Philosophy of ScienceMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods

Humphreys, Paul·2009·Synthese

DOI 10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Scientific Image
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Objective Knowledge, an Evolutionary Approach.
Ruja, H., & Popper, K. R. (1973) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106696 · Cited by 3,782
The Scientific Image.
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,321
Der logische Aufbau der Welt
Rudolf, R. (1998) · Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks · doi:10.28937/978-3-7873-2358-6 · Cited by 1,073
Philosophical Perspectives 5
Leftow, B., & The Society of Christian Philosophers (1996) · Faith and Philosophy · doi:10.5840/faithphil19961323 · Cited by 765
On proof and progress in mathematics
Thurston, W. P. H. (1994) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1994-00502-6 · Cited by 655
Quantum Computer Science: An Introduction
Mermin, N. D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813870 · Cited by 592
Extending Ourselves
Humphreys, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195158709.001.0001 · Cited by 559
Self-citation
Extending ourselves: computational science, empiricism, and scientific method
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0272 · Cited by 487
The Empirical Stance
van Fraassen, B. C. (2017) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300127966 · Cited by 377

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Bedau M. (1997) Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 375–399
Costas, H.-A. (forthcoming). Review of Humphreys [2004], Mind.

Sorted by citations

Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
Mennella, C., Maniscalco, U., De Pietro, G., & Esposito, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297 · Cited by 1,229
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786
Who is afraid of black box algorithms? On the epistemological and ethical basis of trust in medical AI
Durán, J. M., & Jongsma, K. R. (2021) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106820 · Cited by 446
Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Zednik, C. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00382-7 · Cited by 419
Limits of trust in medical AI
Hatherley, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105935 · Cited by 232
Understanding from Machine Learning Models
Sullivan, E. (2019) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axz035 · Cited by 269
Transparency in Complex Computational Systems
Creel, K. (2020) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/709729 · Cited by 223
How Explainability Contributes to Trust in AI
Ferrario, A., & Loi, M. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533202 · Cited by 163
AI as an Epistemic Technology
Alvarado, R. (2023) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-023-00451-3 · Cited by 137
The Philosophy and Epistemology of Simulation: A Review
Grüne‐Yanoff, T., & Weirich, P. (2010) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878109353470 · Cited by 131
Grounds for Trust: Essential Epistemic Opacity and Computational Reliabilism
Durán, J. M., & Formanek, N. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9481-6 · Cited by 138
Discrimination in the age of artificial intelligence
Heinrichs, B. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01192-2 · Cited by 140
Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit
Baumberger, C., Knutti, R., & Hadorn, G. H. (2017) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.454 · Cited by 131
Two Dimensions of Opacity and the Deep Learning Predicament
Boge, F. J. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09569-4 · Cited by 143
Philosophy of Computing and Information Technology
Brey, P. A. E., & Søraker, J. H. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51667-1.50051-3 · Cited by 122
Your evidence? Machine learning algorithms for medical diagnosis and prediction
Heinrichs, B., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24886 · Cited by 104
Reinforcement Learning for Precision Oncology
Eckardt, J., Wendt, K., Bornhäuser, M., & Middeke, J. M. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13184624 · Cited by 100
Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI
Federica Russo, B., Schliesser, E. S., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01617-6 · Cited by 109
Model migrations: mobility and boundary crossings in regional climate prediction
Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2011) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00473.x · Cited by 78
The predictive state: Science, territory and the future of the Indian climate
Mahony, M. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312713501407 · Cited by 75
Scientific Exploration and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Zednik, C., & Boelsen, H. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09583-6 · Cited by 80
The Evolution of Representation in Simple Cognitive Networks
Marstaller, L., Hintze, A., & Adami, C. (2013) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00475 · Cited by 72
Calculated Surprises
Lenhard, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190873288.001.0001 · Cited by 71
Can we trust Big Data? Applying philosophy of science to software
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716664747 · Cited by 77
Agnostic Science. Towards a Philosophy of Data Analysis
Napoletani, D., Panza, M., & Struppa, D. C. (2010) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-010-9186-7 · Cited by 71
How can computer simulations produce new knowledge?
Beisbart, C. (2012) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0049-7 · Cited by 67
Epistemic injustice and data science technologies
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03631-z · Cited by 65
Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use
Barman, K. G., Wood, N. G., & Pawłowski, P. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09778-2 · Cited by 74
Imagination extended and embedded: artifactual versus fictional accounts of models
Knuuttila, T. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1545-2 · Cited by 63
The ethical requirement of explainability for AI-DSS in healthcare: a systematic review of reasons
Freyer, N., Groß, D., & Lipprandt, M. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-024-01103-2 · Cited by 67
What kind of trust does AI deserve, if any?
Alvarado, R. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00224-x · Cited by 60
A practical philosophy of complex climate modelling
Schmidt, G. A., & Sherwood, S. C. (2014) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0102-9 · Cited by 59
Philosophy of science at sea: Clarifying the interpretability of machine learning
Beisbart, C., & Räz, T. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12830 · Cited by 66
Automated opioid risk scores: a case for machine learning-induced epistemic injustice in healthcare
Pozzi, G. (2023) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-023-09676-z · Cited by 64
What is a Simulation Model?
Durán, J. M. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09520-z · Cited by 56
Deep Learning Opacity in Scientific Discovery
Duede, E. (2023) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2023.8 · Cited by 54
Understanding climate phenomena with data-driven models
Knüsel, B., & Baumberger, C. (2020) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.08.003 · Cited by 53
Interactive Laboratories for Science Education: A Subjective Study and Systematic Literature Review
Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6100085 · Cited by 49
Explanation in Agent-Based Modelling: Functions, Causality or Mechanisms?
Elsenbroich, C. (2012) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.1958 · Cited by 47
Trust and Trustworthiness in AI
Durán, J. M., & Pozzi, G. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00843-2 · Cited by 47
AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: a qualitative study on obstetricians’ and midwives’ perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making
Dlugatch, R., Georgieva, A., & Kerasidou, A. (2024) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-023-00990-1 · Cited by 52
Simulation-Based Research in Information Systems
Beese, J., Haki, K., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2018) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-018-0529-1 · Cited by 48
Explaining AI through mechanistic interpretability
Kästner, L., & Crook, B. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00614-4 · Cited by 59
When something goes wrong: Who is responsible for errors in ML decision-making?
Berber, A., & Srećković, S. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01640-1 · Cited by 44
Epistemic Entitlements and the Practice of Computer Simulation
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9487-0 · Cited by 40
Humanistic interpretation and machine learning
Pääkkönen, J., & Ylikoski, P. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02806-w · Cited by 51
On the epistemological analysis of modeling and computational error in the mathematical sciences
Fillion, N., & Corless, R. M. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0339-4 · Cited by 35
Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning
Frisch, M. (2015) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-015-0110-4 · Cited by 32
We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science
Koskinen, I. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2286253 · Cited by 53
Opacity thought through: on the intransparency of computer simulations
Beisbart, C. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03305-2 · Cited by 30
Holism, or the Erosion of Modularity: A Methodological Challenge for Validation
Lenhard, J. (2018) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/699675 · Cited by 29
Computer Simulations and Computational Models in Science
Imbert, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_34 · Cited by 30
Computer Simulations and the Changing Face of Scientific Experimentation
Durán, J. M., & Arnold, E. (2013) · Cited by 28
The computational philosophy: simulation as a core philosophical method
Mayo‐Wilson, C., & Zollman, K. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02950-3 · Cited by 41
Instruments, agents, and artificial intelligence: novel epistemic categories of reliability
Duede, E. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03975-6 · Cited by 37
Towards a Taxonomy for the Opacity of AI Systems
Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2022) · Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09153-7_7 · Cited by 34
About the warrants of computer-based empirical knowledge
Barberousse, A., & Vorms, M. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0482-6 · Cited by 28
Computational Science
Humphreys, P. (2012) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0100 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
The Epistemic Importance of Technology in Computer Simulation and Machine Learning
Resch, M., & Kaminski, A. (2019) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-019-09496-5 · Cited by 32
Cultures of simulations vs. cultures of calculations? The development of simulation practices in meteorology and astrophysics
Sundberg, M. (2010) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.004 · Cited by 27
On the presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods
Ardourel, V., & Jebeile, J. (2016) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-016-0152-2 · Cited by 26
A Puzzle concerning Compositionality in Machines
Nefdt, R. M. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09519-6 · Cited by 27
Analytical Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling: Is Generative Sufficiency Sufficient?
Medina, F. J. L. (2017) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275117725766 · Cited by 27
Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified
Majszak, M., & Jebeile, J. (2023) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.005 · Cited by 25
On the Opacity of Deep Neural Networks
Søgaard, A. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2024.1 · Cited by 31
Computer Simulations as Scientific Instruments
Alvarado, R. (2021) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-021-09812-2 · Cited by 26
Modeling complexity: cognitive constraints and computational model-building in integrative systems biology
MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2018) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-017-0183-9 · Cited by 24
Epistemic Opacity, Confirmation Holism and Technical Debt: Computer Simulation in the Light of Empirical Software Engineering
Newman, J. (2016) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47286-7_18 · Cited by 23
A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure
Mollema, W. J. T. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00801-w · Cited by 24
“Whether related to machine learning models’ epistemic opacity [20], algorithmic classification systems ’ discriminatory automation of testimonial prejudice [31], the distortion of human beliefs via the hallucinations of generative AI [5, 22], the inclusion of the global South in global AI…”
Computing fairness: ethics of modeling and simulation in public health
Bak, M. (2020) · SIMULATION · doi:10.1177/0037549720932656 · Cited by 22
Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning for Predicting Surface Composition, Structure, and Chemistry: A Historical Perspective and Assessment
Roberts, J., Bursten, J. R. S., & Risko, C. M. (2021) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00538 · Cited by 24
The Automated Laplacean Demon: How ML Challenges Our Views on Prediction and Explanation
Srećković, S., Berber, A., & Filipović, N. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09575-6 · Cited by 22
Spotting When Algorithms Are Wrong
Buijsman, S., & Veluwenkamp, H. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-022-09591-0 · Cited by 25
From Models to Simulations
Varenne, F. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315159904 · Cited by 22
Simulation and the Sense of Understanding
Kuorikoski, J. (2009) · PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) · doi:10.4324/9780203808412-16 · Cited by 21
Energy, history, and the humanities: against a new determinism
Turnbull, T. M. (2021) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/07341512.2021.1891394 · Cited by 22
Ontologies in Modeling and Simulation: An Epistemological Perspective
Hofmann, M. A. (2012) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31140-6_3 · Cited by 21
Federation Opacity and the Promise of Federated Learning in Healthcare
Hatherley, J. J., Søgaard, A., Ballantyne, A., & Pauwels, R. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2637093 · Cited by 27
Moving beyond post hoc explainable artificial intelligence: a perspective paper on lessons learned from dynamical climate modeling
O’Loughlin, R., Li, D., Neale, R., & O'Brien, T. A. (2025) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-18-787-2025 · Cited by 19
The epistemic revolution of AI: reconfiguring the foundations of scientific knowledge
Cruz‐Aguilar, M. A. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02658-3 · Cited by 23
Theorem proving in artificial neural networks: new frontiers in mathematical AI
Pantsar, M. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00569-6 · Cited by 19
AI and the need for justification (to the patient)
Muralidharan, A., Savulescu, J., & Schaefer, G. O. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09754-w · Cited by 22
Computational Science and Its Effects
Humphreys, P. W. (2010) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_9 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Getting there from here. Remembering the future of digital humanities: Roberto Busa Award lecture 2013
McCarty, W. (2014) · Literary and Linguistic Computing · doi:10.1093/llc/fqu022 · Cited by 19
What is a Computer Simulation? A Review of a Passionate Debate
Saam, N. J. (2016) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-016-9354-8 · Cited by 19
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Genomic Sequence for Healthcare Systems Prediction
Awotunde, J. B., Adeniyi, A. E., Ajamu, G. J., Balogun, G. B., & Taofeek-Ibrahim, F. A. (2022) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97929-4_19 · Cited by 19
Moral transparency of and concerning algorithmic tools
Hayes, P., van de Poel, I., & Steen, M. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00190-4 · Cited by 26
Uncertainty, Evidence, and the Integration of Machine Learning into Medical Practice
Grote, T., & Berens, P. (2023) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac034 · Cited by 18
Unpacking a Black Box: A Conceptual Anatomy Framework for Agent-Based Social Simulation Models
Dilaver, Ö., & Gilbert, N. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.4998 · Cited by 17
Agent-based Models as Fictive Instantiations of Ecological Processes
Peck, S. L. (2012) · Philosophy and Theory in Biology · doi:10.3998/ptb.6959004.0004.003 · Cited by 17
Values and inductive risk in machine learning modelling: the case of binary classification models
Karaca, K. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00405-1 · Cited by 19
Ex Machina: Analytical platforms, Law and the Challenges of Computational Legal Science
Lettieri, N., Altamura, A., Giugno, R., Guarino, A., Malandrino, D., Pulvirenti, A., Vicidomini, F. K., & Zaccagnino, R. (2018) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi10050037 · Cited by 19
Large-Scale Brain Simulation and Disorders of Consciousness. Mapping Technical and Conceptual Issues
Farisco, M., Kotaleski, J. H., & Evers, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00585 · Cited by 16
A systemic perspective on bridging the principles-to-practice gap in creating ethical artificial intelligence solutions – a critique of dominant narratives and proposal for a collaborative way forward
Herzog, C., & Blank, S. (2024) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2024.2431350 · Cited by 17
Do Videogames Simulate? Virtuality and Imitation in the Philosophy of Simulation
Karhulahti, V. (2015) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878115616219 · Cited by 15
How Scientists Are Brought Back into Science—The Error of Empiricism
Boon, M. (2020) · Human perspectives in health sciences and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25001-0_4 · Cited by 15
Requirements for Tax XAI Under Constitutional Principles and Human Rights
Kuzniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., & Górski, Ł. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15565-9_14 · Cited by 14
Reimagining the Philosophy of Experimentation in Chemistry Education: Embracing AI as a Tool for Scientific Inquiry
Reyes, R. L., & Regala, J. D. (2025) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-025-00667-8 · Cited by 16
Mesoscopic modeling as a cognitive strategy for handling complex biological systems
MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2019) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101201 · Cited by 14
A Formal Framework for Computer Simulations: Surveying the Historical Record and Finding Their Philosophical Roots
Durán, J. M. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00388-1 · Cited by 14

Authors: Humphreys, P.
Affiliations: University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author: Humphreys, Paul
Venue: Synthese
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2008-11-28
Volume: 169
Issue: 3
Pages: 615-626
ISSN: 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
1573-0964
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2
OpenAlex: W2055250996
Cited by: 362
References: 26
Citations by year: 2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI: 28.70
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords: computer simulation, scientific computing, scientific method, philosophy of science, epistemology of simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks