The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the research of Nelson and Schunn (2009); Henderson et al. (2019), who found that feedback quality is strongly associated with specificity.”
From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“That students used the improvement category kindness to a lesser extent than the improvement suggestions specificity, justification, and constructivity, resonates well with studies that have found that the affective features of feedback has less impact on student improvement than cognitive features (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“That student's sensemaking of the feedback correlates with their experience of its usefulness is known from previous studies and relates to the problem of the feedback gap (Jonsson, 2013;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“in a study of peer feedback using 1,073 feedback segments from an online peer review system (SWoRD), Nelson and Schunn (2009) found that student's comprehension of the feedback was the only significant mediator for student implementation.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“In particular, they found that students were more likely to understand the feedback if it offered concrete solutions, a location of the problem(s), or if the feedback included a summary.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2×
“are most important, such as goals (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Hattie & Timperley, 2007 ) and”
Background(1999) · Cited by 12,812
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 2×
“For example, feedback without explanations can improve performance, but not learning (Chi et al. 1989) and the use of examples can influence whether feedback affects learning or performance or both (Gick and Holyoak 1980; 1983).”
BackgroundHandbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,744
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Volume II: Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 601
Iqbal, S., Gul, R. B., Lakhani, A., & Rizvi, N. F. (2014) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p70 · Cited by 14
Brown, G., & Harris, L. R. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.007 · Cited by 14
Morawski, M., & Budke, A. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9030178 · Cited by 17
Online peer assessment: An exploratory case study in a higher education civil engineering course
Dominguez, C. E., Cruz, G., Maia, A. M., Pedrosa, D., & Grams, G. (2012) · International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1109/icl.2012.6402220 · Cited by 13
Zhao, H., & Zhao, B. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820948458 · Cited by 18
Analysis of Feedback Processes in Online Group Interaction: A Methodological Model.
Espasa, A., Guasch, T., & Valdivia, I. M. Á. (2013) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2013.23.59-73 · Cited by 13
Pardo, M., & Castelló, M. (2016) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2016.1196914 · Cited by 13
Sichterman, B., Banihashem, S. K., Verstappen, M., Schipper, M., Waisvisz, P., Noroozi, O., & van Ginkel, S. O. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2521338 · Cited by 15
Soften the Pain, Increase the Gain
Wu, Y., & Bailey, B. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274455 · Cited by 16
Peer Feedback Processes in the Game Industry
Seering, J., Mayol, R., Harpstead, E., Chen, T., Cook, A., & Hammer, J. (2019) · Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play · doi:10.1145/3311350.3347176 · Cited by 12
Moon, A. C., Jung, H., Marbouti, F., Rodgers, K. J., & Diefes‐Dux, H. A. (2013) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2013.6685103 · Cited by 12
Chwo, G. S. M. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.004 · Cited by 18
Self-assessing a test with a possible bonus enhances low performers’ academic performance
Yuan, J., Savadatti, S., & Zheng, G. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104036 · Cited by 13
Scott, D. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59884-4_4 · Cited by 12
Advancing peer learning with learning analytics and artificial intelligence
Noroozi, O., Schunn, C. D., Schneider, B., & Banihashem, S. K. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00559-5 · Cited by 22
Self-citationAI assistance in peer feedback provision: Pedagogically sound, but minimally adopted
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105591 · Cited by 11
Gao, J., & Chen, W. (2025) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2024.2321894 · Cited by 11
Wang, M., Long, T., Li, N., Shi, Y., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13024-z · Cited by 11
Online peer assessment in teacher education
Kurnaz, F. B. (2021) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.987902 · Cited by 11
Doe, S., Gingerich, K. J., & Richards, T. L. (2013) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628313501039 · Cited by 11
Effects of a Mixed-Mode Peer Response on Student Response Behavior and Writing Performance
Wang, J., Hsu, S.-H., Chen, S. Y., Ko, H., Ku, Y.-M., & Chan, T.-W. (2014) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.51.2.e · Cited by 11
Teachers’ written feedback comments on narrative texts in Elementary and Secondary Education
Fustes, M. L., Sánchez, M. J. F., & Montanero, M. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.002 · Cited by 13
Detecting Suggestions in Peer Assessments.
Zingle, G., Radhakrishnan, B., Xiao, Y., Gehringer, E. F., Xiao, Z., Pramudianto, F., Khurana, G., & Arnav, A. (2019) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 11
Clicker Interventions at UniversityLectures and the Feedback Gap
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2019) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-01-02-06 · Cited by 13
Effect of Feedback on Turkish Fourth-Grade Elementary School Students’ Fluent Writing Skills
Kaya, B., Ateş, S., Yıldırım, K., & Rasinski, T. V. (2019) · TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM · doi:10.15390/eb.2019.8413 · Cited by 12
Investigating the Role of Cognitive Feedback in Practice-Oriented Learning for Clinical Diagnostics
Yuan, B., Wang, M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Tao, X., Kushniruk, A. W., & Peng, J. (2019) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-019-09234-z · Cited by 12
Yallop, R. M. A., Taremaa, P., & Leijen, D. A. J. (2021) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.02 · Cited by 10
Liao, J., Yang, J., & Zhang, W. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i21.25001 · Cited by 10
Exploring the efficacy of peer assessment in university translation classrooms
Li, M., Yu, S., Mak, P., & Liu, C. (2023) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2023.2236920 · Cited by 10
The good, bad, and ugly of comment prompts: Effects on length and helpfulness of peer feedback
Mu, H., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00502-8 · Cited by 13
Self-citationEngaging students via synchronous peer feedback in a technology-enhanced learning environment
Cheng, L., Hampton, J. D., & Kumar, S. (2022) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2142874 · Cited by 11
A Measurement Model for Collaborative Online Learning in Postgraduate Engineering Management Studies
Efthymiou, L., Zarifis, A., & Orphanidou, Y. (2020) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4063-3.ch001 · Cited by 10
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13
Zhang, Y., Dai, C., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2052932 · Cited by 10
Using peer assessment to improve middle school mathematical communication
Patchan, M. M., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Deitz, B. N., & McNeill, J. (2022) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2022.2074948 · Cited by 13
Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills
Zhang, H., Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09822 · Cited by 15
Effectiveness of Guided Peer Review of Student Essays in a Large Undergraduate Biology Course
Kelly, L. J. (2015) · Cited by 10
DEVELOPING THE STATISTICAL PROBLEM POSING AND PROBLEM REFINING SKILLS OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS
Leavy, A., & Frischemeier, D. (2022) · Statistics Education Research Journal · doi:10.52041/serj.v21i1.226 · Cited by 9
Wu, H., Zhu, H., & Yang, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059555 · Cited by 13
Understanding Peer Feedback Contributions Using Natural Language Processing
Castro, M., Mello, R. F., Fiorentino, G., Viberg, O., Spikol, D., Baars, M., & Gašević, D. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42682-7_27 · Cited by 9
Supporting Collaborative Writing Tasks in Large-Scale Distance Education
Burchart, M., & Haake, J. M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3355791 · Cited by 9
Waluyo, B., & Panmei, B. (2024) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.2305 · Cited by 17
Li, J., & Jiang, L. G. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101391 · Cited by 10
Wu, S.-H., Jong, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13142-8 · Cited by 12
Unpacking teacher beliefs on feedback: shaping multifaceted teacher feedback literacy
Tam, A. C. F. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2451086 · Cited by 9
Li, K., Lan, J., & Hu, Y. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10467-0 · Cited by 12
Li, A. W., & Collins, P. (2026) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-026-10761-0 · Cited by 9
Peer-feedback as a Translation Training Tool in Web-based Communication
Flanagan, M., & Heine, C. (2015) · HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business · doi:10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22951 · Cited by 11
Thinking Beyond Writing Development in Peer Review
Chaktsiris, M. G., & Southworth, J. (2019) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.8005 · Cited by 10
Classroom Evaluation of a Scaffolding Intervention for Improving Peer Review Localization
Nguyen, H. V., Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_34 · Cited by 9
Effect of Peer Feedback on Paragraph Writing Performance among High School Students
Trang, N. H., & Khau, A. H. (2022) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2022.15211a · Cited by 9
Matsumura, L. C., Wang, E. L., Correnti, R. J., & Litman, D. J. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100689 · Cited by 9
What is my essay really saying? Using extractive summarization to motivate reflection and redrafting
Labeke, N. V., Whitelock, D. M., Field, D., Pulman, S., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2013) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 9
Viability of using Twitter to support peer instruction in teacher education
Luo, T., Dani, E. E., & Cheng, L. (2016) · International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1504/ijsmile.2016.081280 · Cited by 9
Rodgers, K. J., Diefes‐Dux, H. A., & Cardella, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--22080 · Cited by 9
Understanding Differences in Perceived Peer-Review Helpfulness using Natural Language Processing
Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2011) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 9
Peer Review of Writing: Learning from Revision using Peer Feedback and Reviewing Peers' Texts
Patchan, M. M. (2011) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 9
Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement
Cano, E., Jardí, A., Molins, L. L., & Martins, L. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2329170 · Cited by 12
Xie, Q., & Chang, Z. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105167 · Cited by 11
Feng, F., & Yang, W. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13119-7 · Cited by 14
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Daumiller, M. H., & Fleckenstein, J. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2471765 · Cited by 12
Alemdağ, E., & Narciss, S. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00522-4 · Cited by 17
Miller, C., Doering, A., & Scharber, C. (2010) · The Journal of Interactive Learning Research · Cited by 8
Rezai, A. (2022) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2022/6577979 · Cited by 10
Li, X., & Ke, P. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2044013 · Cited by 9
Zwart, D. P., Goei, S. L., Luit, J. E. H. V., & Noroozi, O. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2071946 · Cited by 10
Xiaomeng, Z., & Ravindran, L. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101422 · Cited by 14
Improving Peer Feedback Prediction: The Sentence Level is Right
Nguyen, H. V., & Litman, D. J. (2014) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-1812 · Cited by 8
Identifying Localization in Peer Reviews of Argument Diagrams
Nguyen, H. V., & Litman, D. J. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_10 · Cited by 8
Tang, J., Zhou, X., & Yu, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.52 · Cited by 8
Augmenting Assessment with Learning Analytics
Knight, S. (2020) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_10 · Cited by 9
Clarke, D., Clear, T., Fisler, K., Hauswirth, M., Krishnamurthi, S., Politz, J. G., Tirronen, V., & Wrigstad, T. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2713609.2713612 · Cited by 8
Jedtke, E., & Greefrath, G. (2019) · Mathematics education in the digital era · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_13 · Cited by 8
Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology
Roscoe, R. D., Branaghan, R. J., Cooke, N. J., & Craig, S. D. (2017) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2639-1.ch001 · Cited by 8
Affective Language in Student Peer Reviews: Exploring Data from Three Institutional Contexts
Wärnsby, A., Kauppinen, A., Aull, L. L., Leijen, D. A. J., & Moxley, J. (2018) · Journal of Academic Writing · doi:10.18552/joaw.v8i1.429 · Cited by 8
Come Together: Peer Review with Energy Engineering Students
Nascimento, M. D. S. (2014) · Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. · doi:10.3991/ijep.v4i5.3537 · Cited by 8
Li, K., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, W. W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09690-8 · Cited by 8
Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102397 · Cited by 9
Self-citationStudents’ Perception of Instructional Feedback Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
Abdüsselam, M. S., Baydaş, Ö., & Yılmaz, R. M. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/11811 · Cited by 12
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10346-0 · Cited by 9
Esmaeilee, S. (2024) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-024-00283-3 · Cited by 18
Chen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09667-7 · Cited by 7
Leung, K., Chan, M., Maxwell, G., & Poon, T. S.-C. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_15 · Cited by 7
A word-order based graph representation for relevance identification
Ramachandran, L., & Gehringer, E. F. (2012) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/2396761.2398632 · Cited by 7
Fanshawe, M., Delaney, N., & Powell, A. (2019) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0426-0.ch003 · Cited by 7
Situating Technology-Facilitated Feedback and Revision
McCarthey, S. J., Magnifico, A. M., Woodard, R., & Kline, S. M. (2013) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4341-3.ch009 · Cited by 7
Yazılı anlatımı düzenlemede akran dönütleri: Dönüt türleri, öğrenci algıları
Hamzadayı, E., & Çetinkaya, G. (2011) · Pamukkale University Open Access Archive (Pamukkale University) · Cited by 7
Implementing feedback literacy practices through self-assessment and peer feedback
Soltani, B., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Australian Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/aral.23053.sol · Cited by 7
RevTogether: Supporting Science Story Revision with Multiple AI Agents
Zhang, Y., Fu, K., & Lu, Z. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719888 · Cited by 6
Yue, H., Palermo, C., Liu, R., & He, Y. (2025) · Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation · doi:10.59863/famj7696 · Cited by 9
The Effects of Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Performance
Trang, N. H. (2022) · Vietnam Journal of Education (online)/Vietnam Journal of Education/Giáo dục · doi:10.52296/vje.2022.185 · Cited by 6
Jin, M., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Li, Q., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101394 · Cited by 6
Lu, X., Mahesh, A., Shen, Z., Dudley, M., Sano, L., & Wang, X. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98417-4_28 · Cited by 7
Using collaborative peer feedback and supervision to support doctoral research at a distance
Lai, K. (2011) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2011.1740 · Cited by 6
Toward the Integration of Peer Reviewing and Computational Linguistics Approaches
Park, J., & Cho, K. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116656454 · Cited by 5
Leveraging Quality Prediction Models for Automatic Writing Feedback
Nilforoshan, H., & Wu, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14998 · Cited by 6
Illana-Mahiques, E. (2021) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages6030151 · Cited by 7
Writing Skills and Writing Approaches in ESL Classroom: A Systematic Review
Vejayan, L., & Yunus, M. M. (2022) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i6/13259 · Cited by 6
Wang, Z., Cao, Y., & Gong, S. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221132079 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Melissa M.
- ORCID
- Schunn, Christian D.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-401
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2075371609
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 46.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, writing performance, feedback implementation, problem understanding, peer review, swords
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
