The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the research of Nelson and Schunn (2009); Henderson et al. (2019), who found that feedback quality is strongly associated with specificity.”
From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“That students used the improvement category kindness to a lesser extent than the improvement suggestions specificity, justification, and constructivity, resonates well with studies that have found that the affective features of feedback has less impact on student improvement than cognitive features (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“That student's sensemaking of the feedback correlates with their experience of its usefulness is known from previous studies and relates to the problem of the feedback gap (Jonsson, 2013;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“in a study of peer feedback using 1,073 feedback segments from an online peer review system (SWoRD), Nelson and Schunn (2009) found that student's comprehension of the feedback was the only significant mediator for student implementation.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“In particular, they found that students were more likely to understand the feedback if it offered concrete solutions, a location of the problem(s), or if the feedback included a summary.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2×
“are most important, such as goals (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Hattie & Timperley, 2007 ) and”
Background(1999) · Cited by 12,812
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 2×
“For example, feedback without explanations can improve performance, but not learning (Chi et al. 1989) and the use of examples can influence whether feedback affects learning or performance or both (Gick and Holyoak 1980; 1983).”
BackgroundHandbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,744
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Volume II: Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 601
Steps to implementation: the role of peer feedback inner structure on feedback implementation
Lyu, Q., Chen, W., Su, J., & Heng, K. H. J. G. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2291340 · Cited by 7
Exploring Students’ Perceived Needs and Ideas About Feedback in Online Learning Environments
Ferrara, L. A., & Butcher, K. R. (2012) · International Journal of Cyber Behavior Psychology and Learning · doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2012040104 · Cited by 6
A focus on content: the use of rubrics in peer review to guide students and instructors
Ashley, K. D., & Goldin, I. M. (2011) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 6
Designing Writing Tasks in Google Docs that Encourage Conversation
Woodard, R., & Babcock, A. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5982-7.ch001 · Cited by 6
A GEARed peer feedback model and implications for learning facilitation
Huang, S.-C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1439881 · Cited by 7
Yallop, R. M. A., & Leijen, D. A. J. (2018) · Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.5128/erya14.15 · Cited by 6
The effects of different types of written corrective feedback on students’ texting mistakes
Berkant, H. G., Derer, N. B., & Derer, Ö. K. (2020) · English Language Teaching Educational Journal · doi:10.12928/eltej.v3i3.3136 · Cited by 6
Smile! Positive Emojis Improve Reception and Intention to Use Constructive Feedback
Aritajati, C., & Rosson, M. B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_21 · Cited by 6
Self-Regulation and Adult Learners
Zaky, H. (2021) · International Journal of Curriculum Development and Learning Measurement · doi:10.4018/ijcdlm.2021070104 · Cited by 6
Harding, L., Nadler, R., Rawlins, P., Day, E., Miller, K., & Martin, K. (2020) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc202031040 · Cited by 6
Evaluating topic-word review analysis for understanding student peer review performance
Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2013) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 6
The Effect of Feedback on Informative Text Writing: AI or Teacher?
Baz, M. A., & Hasırcı, S. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.871 · Cited by 12
Embedding retrieval practice in undergraduate biochemistry teaching using PeerWise
Higgins, T., Dudley, E., Bodger, O. G., Newton, P. M., & Francis, N. (2023) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.21799 · Cited by 5
Ask your peer! How requests for peer feedback affect peer feedback responses
van Blankenstein, F. M., Dirkx, K., & Bruycker, N. D. (2024) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2024.2376832 · Cited by 5
Web-based Peer Assessment: A Case Study with Civil Engineering Students
Cruz, G., Dominguez, C. E., Maia, A. M., Pedrosa, D., & Grams, G. (2013) · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) · doi:10.3991/ijep.v3is1.2411 · Cited by 5
Walton, G. (2019) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1625997 · Cited by 5
Student Experiences With Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Milne, S. L., Petterson, M. N., Chen, J., & Shultz, G. V. (2024) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883241263542 · Cited by 13
Helpfulness-Guided Review Summarization
Xiong, W. (2013) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 5
First-year engineering students' peer feedback on open-ended mathematical modeling problems
Rodgers, K. J., Diefes‐Dux, H. A., Cardella, M., & Fry, A. (2012) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2012.6462467 · Cited by 5
Influence of teaching assistants' motivation on student learning
Rodgers, K. J., Marbouti, F., Shafaat, A., Jung, H., & Diefes‐Dux, H. A. (2014) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2014.7044004 · Cited by 5
Mishra, S. D., Rebitch, C. B., & Choi, I. (2020) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2019.10.007 · Cited by 5
Carter, T., & Thirakunkovit, S. (2019) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 5
The Impact of Sentiment-driven Feedback on Knowledge Reuse in Online Communities
Zurich, E., Grigore, M., Rosenkranz, C., & Sutanto, J. (2015) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00073 · Cited by 5
Instructor vs Peer Writing Feedback in a Large First-Year Engineering Course
Ekoniak, M., & Paretti, M. (2018) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659050 · Cited by 5
Giuseppe, T. D., Ianniello, A., & Corona, F. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11080398 · Cited by 5
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2024) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804 · Cited by 8
Cai, Y.-Y. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251383038 · Cited by 5
Leveraging generative AI to facilitate peer feedback in collaborative argumentation learning
Chang, Y., Liu, Q., Lu, Y., & Miao, E. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00586-w · Cited by 4
Driving and Embracing Change: Learning and Teaching Languages and Communication in Higher Education
Károly, A., Kokkonen, L., Gerlander, M., & Taalas, P. (2024) · JYU Studies · doi:10.17011/jyustudies/1 · Cited by 7
Graph-Structures Matching for Review Relevance Identification
Ramachandran, L., & Gehringer, E. F. (2013) · Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w13-5008 · Cited by 4
Fong, C. J., Schallert, D. L., Lin, S., & Altan, S. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351 · Cited by 4
Özbek, T., Daumiller, M., Roshany-Tabrizi, A., Mömke, T., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100540 · Cited by 5
Chen, Y., Li, M., & Jong, M. S. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251342672 · Cited by 7
Armstrong, T. (2015) · Journal of Academic Writing · doi:10.18552/joaw.v5i1.151 · Cited by 4
Did I really mean that? Applying automatic summarisation techniques to formative feedback
Field, D., Pulman, S., Labeke, N. V., Whitelock, D. M., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2013) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 4
Hurst, A., & Nespoli, O. G. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.26477 · Cited by 4
CalliSmart: an Adaptive Informed Environment for Intelligent Calligraphy Training
Frenoy, R., Thouvenin, I., Soullard, Y., & Gapenne, O. (2016) · HAL · Cited by 4
Effective Use of Peer-feedback in Developing Academic Writing Skills of Undergraduate Students
Mon, Y. Y., & Zein, S. (2017) · Language Education in Asia · doi:10.5746/leia/17/v8/i2/a04/mon_zein · Cited by 4
Engineering Students English Teaching in E-Learning Environment
Dolgova, N., Larionova, J. S., & Shirokolobova, A. G. (2019) · MATEC Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/matecconf/201929706007 · Cited by 4
Indications of Paired- vs. Grouped-Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Activities
Tan, L. N., & Ho, P. V. P. (2021) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210226.032 · Cited by 5
The Seek & Share Resources Tool: Measuring a Learning Practice of Making
White, A. M., Saplan, K., Wardrip, P. S., Bank, A., Akiva, T., & Brahms, L. (2022) · Visitor Studies · doi:10.1080/10645578.2022.2056406 · Cited by 4
Learning from feedback in college courses: Student beliefs, practices, and preferences
Zepeda, C. D., Ortegren, F. R., & Butler, A. C. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4118 · Cited by 4
Bacon, E. D., Satienchayakorn, N., & Prakaiborisuth, P. (2021) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v28i2.251147 · Cited by 4
Lin, K.-C., Li, N.-T., & Chen, M. (2024) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-11-2023-0569 · Cited by 6
RetractedChen, W., Lyu, Q., Su, J., Chai, A. S. C., Zhang, W., Su, G., & Li, X. (2023) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2023.747522 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Using Formative Assessment Attributes in Daily Instruction on Student Affect
Ruland, J. W. (2011) · Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago) · Cited by 4
Facilitating Collaborative Learning Through Peer Assessment APP: A Case Study
Zheng, L. (2016) · Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1972-2_9 · Cited by 4
A MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPED FOR SCAFFOLDING ESL LEARNERS IN PROVIDING PEER FEEDBACK
Lam, C. N. C., Habil, H., & Hui, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) · doi:10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp291-313 · Cited by 4
Eliciting Informative Feedback in Peer Review: Importance of Problem-Specific Scaffolding
Goldin, I. M., & Ashley, K. D. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_14 · Cited by 4
Calvo, R. A., Aditomo, A., Southavilay, V., & Yacef, K. (2012) · Ubaya Repository (University of Surabaya) · doi:10.22318/icls2012.2.416 · Cited by 4
Girasoli, A. J. (2016) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 4
Clicker Interventions, Promoting Student Activity and Feedback at University Lectures
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_189 · Cited by 4
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback in second language writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2019) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17139836.v1 · Cited by 2
Peer review in early academic writing: impact vs. students’ beliefs
Boillos, M. M. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2311836 · Cited by 3
GenAI as a Peer Review Support: Impact on Feedback Quality, Quantity, and Student Perceptions
Chase, C. C., & Venook, R. D. (2025) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2025.160205 · Cited by 3
Choi, W. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251383693 · Cited by 6
Hybrid Intelligence Feedback: A Model Proposal and Preliminary Study
Coşkun, A., & Er, E. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70212 · Cited by 3
The Effectiveness of and Students’ Perceptions of Peer Feedback: A Vietnam Action Research Project
Phan, T. N. L. (2023) · Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v15n1.09 · Cited by 3
Measuring Peer Feedback on Writing Class: A Study on Third-Semester Pre-Service English Teachers
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2019) · Lingua Cultura · doi:10.21512/lc.v13i1.5058 · Cited by 6
A Review of Empirical Studies on Peerceptiv
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2022) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training · doi:10.1109/ithet56107.2022.10031747 · Cited by 2
Self-citationLiu, C., Doshi, D., Bhargava, M., Shang, R., Cui, J., Xu, D., & Gehringer, E. F. (2023) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.15 · Cited by 3
Mngomezulu, H., Mkhize, T. F., & Nhlumayo, B. S. (2024) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research · doi:10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.10 · Cited by 3
Nurse teachers’ conceptions and practices of written feedback in Karachi
Idrees, S., Gul, R. B., Tharani, A. J., & Ali, S. K. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Education and Practice · doi:10.5430/jnep.v7n3p94 · Cited by 3
Homayounzadeh, M., Mehrpour, S., & Saadat, M. (2016) · Journal of Language Teaching and Learning · doi:10.66887/jltl.v6i2.28 · Cited by 3
Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology
Roscoe, R. D., Branaghan, R. J., Cooke, N. J., & Craig, S. D. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5472-1.ch104 · Cited by 3
Lap, T. Q. (2013) · i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching · doi:10.26634/jelt.3.4.2517 · Cited by 3
Skill Level Based Cooperative Peer Feedback in EFL Writing Students
Ryoo, M.-L., & Wing, M. L. (2012) · Cited by 3
Ubiquitous Writing: Writing Technologies for Situated Mediation and Proactive Assessment
Kumar, V., Chang, M., & Leacock, T. L. (2011) · Ubiquitous Learning An International Journal · doi:10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v03i03/40289 · Cited by 3
Haugaard, R. H. (2018) · Fachsprache · doi:10.24989/fs.v50i3-4.1517 · Cited by 3
Board 60: PeerLogic: Web Services for Peer Assessment
Gehringer, E. F. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--32388 · Cited by 3
An Exploratory Study into Graduate Students’ Attitudes Towards Peer Assessment
Chen, H.-C., Pisoni, G., & Gijlers, H. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_32 · Cited by 3
Inclusive Language in Student Writing: Awareness and Innovation
Ahmed, K., McCarthy, P. M., Kaddoura, N. W., Thomas, A. M., & Al-harthy, A. (2022) · Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal · doi:10.14738/assrj.97.12606 · Cited by 3
Jia, Q., Cao, Y., & Gehringer, E. F. (2022) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bea-1.8 · Cited by 3
Fostering argumentation with online learning systems in higher education
Haro, A. V. (2022) · doi:10.18174/569585 · Cited by 4
Potencialidades da metodologia ativa revisão por pares na formação inicial docente
Camillo, C. M., & Sepel, L. M. N. (2022) · Amazônia Revista de Educação em Ciências e Matemáticas · doi:10.18542/amazrecm.v18i41.13550 · Cited by 2
Review of Studies on Feedback Types: Systematic Review Study
Dönmez, A., & AYDIN, İ. S. (2023) · Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.59409/ojer.1369117 · Cited by 2
Almuadi, M., & Barr, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_19 · Cited by 3
The Impact of Peer Feedback on L2 Literature Review Writing: A Mixed Methods Study
Yan, J., Zhu, Y. H., & Ye, X. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241288737 · Cited by 13
Unveiling Genre Analysis and Genre-based Instruction in EAP
Yaylı, D. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72545-6_10 · Cited by 2
A bibliometric analysis of the SCOPUS ‐indexed research on written peer feedback
Saeli, H., Rahmati, P., & Koltovskaia, S. (2025) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70036 · Cited by 2
Hornstein, J., Greisel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09745-4 · Cited by 5
Investigating the Relation Between Peer Critiquing and Model Revisions in Modeling‐Based Learning
Chang, H. (2025) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.70026 · Cited by 2
Comparison of Peer Feedback by Undergraduate Korean Students and Native English Freshmen
김훈밀 (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.17936/pkelt.2013.25.3.004 · Cited by 2
Peer Assessment Rubric Analyzer: An NLP approach to analyzing rubric items for better peer-review
Rashid, M. P., Gehringer, E. F., Young, M., Doshi, D., Jia, Q., & Xiao, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet50392.2021.9759679 · Cited by 3
Learner Uptake with Automated Feedback and Teacher Feedback in an Online EFL Writing Context
Pu, J. (2023) · Studies in English Language Teaching · doi:10.22158/selt.v11n2p43 · Cited by 2
Misiejuk, K., Bastesen, J., & Ershova, T. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2516117 · Cited by 3
The impact of peer feedback features on feedback receivers' implementation in university classrooms
Lyu, Q., Chen, W., & Heng, K. H. J. G. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2514097 · Cited by 2
GÜÇ MOTİVASYONUNUN İŞ SEVGİSİNE ETKİSİNDE GERİBİLDİRİM ARAMA DAVRANIŞININ DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ
Aslan, S., & ANTALYALI, Ö. L. (2018) · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi · doi:10.21076/vizyoner.428349 · Cited by 2
Online Peer Assessment in Nurturing Students Writing Skill
Pradana, M. (2021) · FOSTER Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.24256/foster-jelt.v2i2.34 · Cited by 2
The Use of Peer Assessment as an Inclusive Learning Strategy in Higher Education Institutions
Meletiadou, E. (2021) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8579-5.ch001 · Cited by 2
Field, D., Richardson, J. T. E., Pulman, S., Labeke, N. V., & Whitelock, D. M. (2014) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 2
Assessment Feedback: We can do better
Evans, C. (2012) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 2
Lei, C. (2012) · Reflecting education · Cited by 2
An Interactive Analytic Tool for Peer-Review Exploration
Xiong, W., Litman, D. J., Wang, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2012) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 2
Self-citationMobile Computing and Mixed-Initiative Support for Writing Competence
Kumar, V., Chang, M., & Leacock, T. L. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-842-2.ch021 · Cited by 2
An Adaptive and Personalized English Reading Recommendation System
Wu, T., & Huang, S.-H. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_29-1 · Cited by 2
Insights on web-based peer review: A case study with energy engineering students
Dominguez, C., Nascimento, M., Maia, A., Pedrosa, D., & Cruz, G. (2013) · 2013 1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE) · doi:10.1109/cispee.2013.6701991 · Cited by 1
What Types of Essay Feedback Influence Implementation: Structure Alone or Structure and Content?
Whitelock, D. M., Twiner, A., Richardson, J. T. E., Field, D., & Pulman, S. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9_16 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Melissa M.
- ORCID
- Schunn, Christian D.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-401
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2075371609
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 46.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, writing performance, feedback implementation, problem understanding, peer review, swords
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
