The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the research of Nelson and Schunn (2009); Henderson et al. (2019), who found that feedback quality is strongly associated with specificity.”
From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“That students used the improvement category kindness to a lesser extent than the improvement suggestions specificity, justification, and constructivity, resonates well with studies that have found that the affective features of feedback has less impact on student improvement than cognitive features (Hattie & Timperley, 2007;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“That student's sensemaking of the feedback correlates with their experience of its usefulness is known from previous studies and relates to the problem of the feedback gap (Jonsson, 2013;Nelson & Schunn, 2009).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson & Schunn, 2009
In the citing paper
“in a study of peer feedback using 1,073 feedback segments from an online peer review system (SWoRD), Nelson and Schunn (2009) found that student's comprehension of the feedback was the only significant mediator for student implementation.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
In the citing paper
“In particular, they found that students were more likely to understand the feedback if it offered concrete solutions, a location of the problem(s), or if the feedback included a summary.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Nelson and Schunn (2009)
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 2×
“are most important, such as goals (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Hattie & Timperley, 2007 ) and”
Background(1999) · Cited by 12,812
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 2×
“For example, feedback without explanations can improve performance, but not learning (Chi et al. 1989) and the use of examples can influence whether feedback affects learning or performance or both (Gick and Holyoak 1980; 1983).”
BackgroundHandbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,744
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Volume II: Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 601
The Effect of Oral Feedback on Perceived Classroom Community in Undergraduate Students
Boyles, J. L. (2017) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 2
Maximizing Benefit of Peer-Feedback to Increase Feedback Uptake in Academic Writing.
Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2015) · Cited by 2
Peer Feedback in Linked Courses: Perceptions of Benefits and Problems
Menagarishvili, O., Frazee, A., & Burnett, R. (2022) · 2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/procomm53155.2022.00065 · Cited by 2
Özkanal, Ü., & Gezen, E. E. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Education Studies · doi:10.48166/ejaes.1343506 · Cited by 2
An Adaptive and Personalized English Reading Recommendation System
Wu, T., & Huang, S.-H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_29 · Cited by 2
PEER FEEDBACK ON STUDENT TEACHERS’ TEACHING PRACTICE THROUGH MICROBLOGGING WITH INSTAGRAM
Indriani, L. (2022) · Academic Journal Perspective Education Language and Literature · doi:10.33603/perspective.v10i2.7232 · Cited by 2
Advice for Action with Automatic Feedback Systems
Whitelock, D. M. (2018) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68318-8_7 · Cited by 2
Student Peer Feedback in a Translation Task
Heine, C. (2019) · Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5225-3.ch015 · Cited by 6
InliAnTe: Instrument für die linguistische Analyse von Textkommentierungen
Beyer, A. (2018) · Linguistik Online · doi:10.13092/lo.91.4394 · Cited by 2
Una experiencia de revisión de productos escritos entre estudiantes de Formación Profesional.
Castro, C. E. R. (2020) · Revista Investigación en la Escuela · doi:10.12795/ie.2020.i102.12 · Cited by 1
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATTITUDE TOWARDS PEER REVIEW AND QUALITY OF PEER FEEDBACK
Bosboom, R. E., Goff, M., Haan, R. D., & Isherwood, L. (2014) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 2
Scientific Explanations Peer Feedback or Teacher Feedback
Lange, K. M. (2011) · Cited by 2
Clicker Interventions: Promoting Student Activity and Feedback at University Lectures
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_189-2 · Cited by 3
Hopton, S.-B. (2013) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4341-3.ch010 · Cited by 1
Fethiye, T. E. K. E., Kaya, O. N., & Kaya, Z. (2021) · Uşak üniversitesi eğitim araştırmaları dergisi/Uşak Üniversitesi eğitim araştırmaları dergisi · doi:10.29065/usakead.852967 · Cited by 1
Medstudentvurdering i gruppe på bachelor i sykepleie
Liland, M., & Steinseth, E. B. (2023) · Uniped · doi:10.18261/uniped.46.1.6 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Assessment Systems in Higher Education
Al-Amin, M., Saqui, F. Z., & Khan, M. R. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2145-4.ch002 · Cited by 1
Burhanuddin, B., Arrafii, M. A., & Mahsun (2024) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00897-4 · Cited by 1
Integrating group awareness into team‐based learning
Lin, J., & Chen, H.-R. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13058 · Cited by 1
Colombo, L. M., Rodas, E. L., & Álvarez, G. (2024) · Learning and Teaching · doi:10.3167/latiss.2024.170203 · Cited by 2
Beyond the Visible Gain: Recognizing the Role of Peer Feedback in Vocabulary Learning
Huang, C. (2025) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-025-00205-3 · Cited by 1
Wang, J., Jin, X., Bai, B., & Zhou, H. (2025) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688251352265 · Cited by 4
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Zamorano, D., & Sánchez‐Iglesias, I. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100987 · Cited by 1
Yazma Eğitiminde Geri Bildirim: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve
Fidan, M., & ÇARKIT, C. (2025) · Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.53506/egitim.1643997 · Cited by 1
Teachers provide more candid feedback after delivering wise feedback messages
Harber, K. D., Gorman, J. L., & Godsil, R. D. (2025) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-025-10142-5 · Cited by 1
Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566 · Cited by 1
Effects of peer feedback and self-assessment on writing
Lorca, A. L., Peltzer, K., Busse, V., & Krause, U.-M. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102253 · Cited by 4
A Coding Framework for Analyzing the Types and Levels of Peer Feedback
Lee, S., & Ha, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418083 · Cited by 1
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102428 · Cited by 1
Self-citationResum'Web: A System for Improving the Summary Writing and the Text Understanding
Mandin, S. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2014.44 · Cited by 1
Dominguez, C. E., Payan‐Carreira, R., Nascimento, M. M., & Morais, F. (2015) · Repository of UTAD (Universidad De Tras-os Montes e Alto Douro) · Cited by 1
Dönüt Alan mı Memnun Veren mi? Çevrimiçi Akran Dönütü İle İlgili Öğrenci Görüşleri
Çevik, Y. D. (2014) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 1
Measuring affective language in known peer feedback on L2 Academic writing courses: A novel approach
Yallop, R. M. A. (2016) · Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.5128/erya12.17 · Cited by 1
Levelling (Up) the Playing Field: How Feminist Gamers Self-Identify and Learn in Online Communities
Das, S. (2014) · Advances in social networking and online communities book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5206-4.ch006 · Cited by 1
Effects of Online Peer Feedback on Dancers at Different Levels
Huang, C., & Huang, I. (2016) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiai-aai.2016.249 · Cited by 2
Web Services for Automated Assessment of Reviews.
Yadav, R. K. (2016) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · Cited by 1
Building interdisciplinary bridges
Wärnsby, A., Kauppinen, A., Eriksson, A., Wiktorsson, M., Bick, E., & Olsson, L.-J. (2016) · Studies in language companion series · doi:10.1075/slcs.177.08war · Cited by 1
Jerry, C., Jan, J. M., & Samuel, M. S. G. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 1
Score-Group Framing Negatively Impacts Peer Evaluations
Durkin, C., Rossano, F., & Klemmer, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274314 · Cited by 1
Supporting Feedback Uptake in Online Peer Assessment.
Funk, A., Wichmann, A., & Rummel, N. (2013) · Cited by 1
Public Peer Review Motivates Higher Quality Feedback
Wang, X., Chen, Y., GODLEY, A. J., & Rosé, C. P. (2018) · International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS]. eBooks · doi:10.22318/cscl2018.296 · Cited by 1
Student Peer Feedback and Assessment in Higher Education
Hanlon, N., Murray, D. E., & Niculae, E. (2020) · Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) · Cited by 1
AKADEMİK YAZIMDA KULLANILAN GERİ BİLDİRİM ÜZERİNE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN İNCELENMESİ
Cevher, A. Y., İsmail, K. A. R. A., AKBAY, M., Oktay, Ö., & Göktaş, Y. (2022) · Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama · doi:10.17943/etku.955882 · Cited by 1
En metode til undersøgelse af digitale interaktioner fra de studerendes perspektiv
Stenalt, M. H. (2022) · Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM) · doi:10.7146/lom.v15i26.130397 · Cited by 1
Feedback Methods in the Music Classroom: A Review of Literature
Cardenas, R. (2023) · Update Applications of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/87551233231186533 · Cited by 1
Adawiyah, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Mandalika Literature · doi:10.36312/jml.v3i3.1037 · Cited by 1
Crook, S. (2022) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc202231879 · Cited by 2
Ilkogretim Sinif Ogretmenligi, M. E. B., Ülkü Eda, K. A. R. A., & TAVŞANLI, Ö. F. (2023) · Educational Academic Research · doi:10.5152/aujkkef.2023.22166 · Cited by 1
Emotional Orientation in Peer Assessment: Impact on College Student Performance
Chen, Y., Hao, C., Zheng, A., & Feng, L. (2024) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00884-9 · Cited by 1
Xiong, W., Litman, D. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2010) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Self-citationFeedback and Revision: A Self-assessment Intervention
Kim, P. H. (2015) · doi:10.7916/d8jw8dcw · Cited by 1
Assessment feedback in higher education: preliminary results in a course of strategic management
Boronat-Navarro, M., Forés, B., & Puig‐Denia, A. (2015) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head15.2015.374 · Cited by 1
Innovation of settings in higher education
Garavaglia, A., & Petti, L. (2019) · EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY · doi:10.3280/ess2-2018oa7086 · Cited by 1
Implementing a Peer Feedback Intervention within a Community of Practice Framework
Gilken, J., & Johnson, H. L. (2019) · Community College Journal of Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/10668926.2019.1655502 · Cited by 1
Rapke, T., Husband, M., & Bourrie, H. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_8 · Cited by 1
Diseño de un guion para elaborar retroalimentaciones entre pares en un escenario digital
Díaz, G. A. M., Celis, Z. Y. D., & Cano, J. M. M. (2020) · Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.21556/edutec.2020.72.1583
‘Forced to think’—an analysis of how students benefit from online warm-up exercises with feedback
Kulmala, K., Kokkonen, T., & Kontro, I. (2021) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/abfd40 · Cited by 1
Mentz, E., & Lubbe, A. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.07 · Cited by 1
Implementation Of Peer Review Assessment To Engineering Students
Idrus, H. B., Mulyono, H., Ramli, R. M., Bhattacharyya, E., & Zulaiha, S. (2021) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202112401001 · Cited by 1
Olivier, J. (2021) · NWU self-directed learning series · doi:10.4102/aosis.2021.bk280.02 · Cited by 1
Online Assessment and Feedback Practices: Virtually Narrowing the Distance
Gkasis, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74088-7_38 · Cited by 1
A Study of Teachers’ Strategies in Providing Feedback in English Writing Class
Nazmillah, N., Hidayat, D. N., Defianty, M., Anita, A., & Muin, A. M. (2022) · ACITYA Journal of Teaching & Education · doi:10.30650/ajte.v4i2.3258 · Cited by 1
How to Motivate Users to Continuously Participate in Virtual CSR Co-creation
Ye, W., & Yao, Y. (2023) · Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference (MSIEID) · doi:10.4108/eai.9-12-2022.2327580 · Cited by 1
Capítulo 6. Con la creatividad por las nubes: Docencia y creatividad en el Cloud Class
De-Marchis, G. P., & De-la-Vara-López, J. (2023) · Espejo de Monografías de Comunicación Social · doi:10.52495/c6.emcs.15.c45
The Impact of Written Feedback in Geometry Problem Solving through a Gallery Walk
Santos, C., & Barbosa, A. (2023) · International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology · doi:10.46328/ijemst.2891 · Cited by 1
Soden, W. (2013) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 1
TYPES OF FEEDBACK IN PEER REVIEW AND THE EFFECT ON STUDENT MOTIVATION AND WRITING QUALITY
Sloan, C. C. (2017) · Michigan State University Libraries · doi:10.25335/6n2n-5347 · Cited by 1
Clicker Interventions: Promoting Student Activity and Feedback at University Lectures
Egelandsdal, K., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_189-1 · Cited by 1
An Analysis of Educational Technology Publications: Who, What and Where in the Last 20 Years
del Río, G. O. N. B. (2016) · doi:10.12794/metadc849761 · Cited by 1
He, H., Said, N., & Peter, J. (2026) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2026.101028
Çabakçor, B. Ö., Akşan, E., Öztürk, T., & Çimer, S. O. (2011) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.16949/turcomat.80763
Feedback on Academic Essay Writing through pre-Emptive Hints: Moving Towards "Advice for Action"
Whitelock, D. M., Twiner, A., Richardson, J. T. E., Field, D., & Pulman, S. (2015) · Open Research Online (The Open University)
Name, N., & Wolcott, S. K. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1837762
Kim, H. (2012) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Physical response to feedback in game-based learning
Rodgers, K. J., Tafur, M., Marbouti, F., & Seipel, J. E. (2014) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2014.7044158
Laura, K., & Rosc, R. D. (2013)
INVESTIGATING THE REVISION PROCESS IN A WEB-BASED PEER REVIEW SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING
Leijen, D. A. J. (2015) · EDULEARN proceedings
The pragmatics of margin comments: An empirical study
Field, D., Pulman, S., & Whitelock, D. M. (2014) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-1806
Effective Diagnostic Feedback for Online Multiple-Choice Questions
Guo, R., Palmer-Brown, D., Lee, S. W., & Cai, F. F. (2012) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33409-2_33
Arandes, J. B., & Meliá, M. R. (2015) · Universitat Jaume I eBooks · doi:10.6035/v.jornestuni.2015
Assessment for learning: supervisory feedback practice in higher education
Talib, R., Supie, H. S. M., Kamsah, M. Z., Naim, H. A., & Yusof, S. M. (2016) · Man in India
PENSAMENTO CRÍTICO NA EDUCAÇÃO DESAFIOS ATUAIS
Dominguez, C. E., Morais, E., Morais, F., Cruz, G., Lopes, J. P., Silva, M. H., Monteiro, M. J., Nascimento, M. M., Catarino, P., Payan‐Carreira, R., et al. (2015) · Repository of UTAD (Universidad De Tras-os Montes e Alto Douro)
Nilforoshan, H., Sands, J. K., Lin, K., Khanna, R., & Wu, E. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University)
김훈밀 (2013) · Journal of the Korea English Education Society · doi:10.18649/jkees.2013.12.3.261
Reading for Problematizing in Essay Writing with Annotation and Affective Tagging
Suzuki, S., & Suzuki, H. (2011) · Educational technology research · doi:10.15077/etr.kj00007561994
Wallis, R. (2017) · University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton)
Gilken, J. (2018) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Teaching Peer Feedback as Ethical Practice
Miller, D., Hicks, T. W., & Golab, S. (2018) · Language arts journal of Michigan · doi:10.9707/2168-149x.2178
Koretsky, M., Nefcy, E. J., Gilbuena, D. M., & Whinnery, J. L. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--20494
Koretsky, M., Champagne, A. B., & Gilbuena, D. M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--19612
Rodway, C. L. (2018) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/3613
خلیل, ش. س. م. (2018) · المجلة العلمية المحکمة للجمعية المصرية للکمبيوتر التعليمي · doi:10.21608/eaec.2018.52817
Ferrara, L. (2017) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · doi:10.33524/0f-fxek-0j2x
Interpreting Physics Teachers’ Feedback Comments on Students’ Solutions to Motion Tasks
Parvanehnezhad, Z., & Nashon, S. M. (2019) · International Journal of Education (IJE) · doi:10.5121/ije.2019.7103
Determining Specificity of L2 Peer Response in Learning Management System-Based Writing
DeHond, G. (2020) · English Teaching · doi:10.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.69
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nelson, Melissa M.
- ORCID
- Schunn, Christian D.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2008-04-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-401
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2075371609
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 46.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, writing performance, feedback implementation, problem understanding, peer review, swords
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review