Cited by 103Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prior knowledge activation: how different concept mapping tasks lead to substantial differences in cognitive processes, learning outcomes, and perceived self-efficacy

Gurlitt, Johannes, Renkl, Alexander·2010·Instructional Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-008-9090-5

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, Vol. 4: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  2. Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning: The use of prior knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Utrecht: Lemma B.V.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–103 of 103

Metadata

Authors
Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Gurlitt, Johannes
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2009-01-08
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
417-433
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2022556519
Cited by
103
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
concept mapping, prior knowledge activation, cognitive processes, elaboration, model development, think-aloud, learning outcomes, self-efficacy, coherence effects, hypertext learning, economics education, meteorology education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review