Cited by 67Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles

Shoval, Ella·2011·Instructional Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11251-010-9137-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoval, E.
Affiliations
Givat Washington Academic College of Education (IL)
Corresponding author
Shoval, Ella
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2010-06-24
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
453-466
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2073630469
Cited by
67
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
mindful movement, cooperative learning, angles, geometry learning, kinesthetic learning, academic performance, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review