Cited by 502Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks

Open access
Paas, Fred, Sweller, John·2012·Educational Psychology Review

Abstract

Cognitive load theory is intended to provide instructional strategies derived from experimental, cognitive load effects. Each effect is based on our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, primarily the limited capacity and duration of a human working memory. These limitations are ameliorated by changes in long-term memory associated with learning. Initially, cognitive load theory's view of human cognitive architecture was assumed to apply to all categories of information. Based on Geary’s ( Educational Psychologist 43 , 179–195 2008 ; 2011 ) evolutionary account of educational psychology, this interpretation of human cognitive architecture requires amendment. Working memory limitations may be critical only when acquiring novel information based on culturally important knowledge that we have not specifically evolved to acquire. Cultural knowledge is known as biologically secondary information. Working memory limitations may have reduced significance when acquiring novel information that the human brain specifically has evolved to process, known as biologically primary information. If biologically primary information is less affected by working memory limitations than biologically secondary information, it may be advantageous to use primary information to assist in the acquisition of secondary information. In this article, we suggest that several cognitive load effects rely on biologically primary knowledge being used to facilitate the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge. We indicate how incorporating an evolutionary view of human cognitive architecture can provide cognitive load researchers with novel perspectives of their findings and discuss some of the practical implications of this view.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This theoretical article proposes an evolutionary upgrade to cognitive load theory: working memory limits mainly constrain biologically secondary knowledge, while biologically primary knowledge can be recruited to support learning of complex secondary tasks. It illustrates this via the collective working memory effect, the human movement effect, and embodied cognition through gesture and object manipulation.

Key findings

  • Working memory is limited to 4±1 elements and about 20 s, but these limits are reduced or eliminated when dealing with familiar information organized as schemas in long-term memory.
  • Biologically primary knowledge—such as face recognition, speech, face-to-face communication, gesture, object manipulation, and observation of human movement—is acquired without explicit instruction and with minimal working memory load, and can facilitate acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge such as reading and mathematics.
  • The collective working memory effect: for high cognitive load tasks, collaborative learning is more efficient than individual learning; for low cognitive load tasks, individual learning is more efficient than collaborative learning, due to the trade-off between distributing load and communication/coordination costs.
  • The human movement effect: dynamic visualizations can be superior to static graphics when learning human motor skills; the meta-analysis of Höffler and Leutner found the largest effect size when animations were highly realistic and involved procedural-motor knowledge. Embodied cognition findings show gesturing lowers cognitive load and improves recall, and object manipulation improves reading comprehension.

Methods

  • Theoretical/conceptual article, not a new empirical study; it integrates Geary’s evolutionary educational psychology with cognitive load theory.
  • Draws on prior empirical and neuroscience findings, including Kirschner et al. on collaborative learning, Wong et al. on origami, Ayres et al. on knot-tying and puzzle rings, Goldin-Meadow et al. on gesture, and Glenberg et al. on the Moved by Reading intervention.
  • Main analysis is conceptual synthesis: reinterpreting cognitive load effects as cases where biologically primary knowledge assists the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge.

Limitations

  • Stated: the primary/secondary distinction is well defined but it may not always be obvious into which category a skill falls; many skills may lie on a continuum rather than a dichotomy.
  • Stated: collaborative learning evidence is mixed; object manipulation’s effect on working memory load during instruction has not yet been determined; future research is needed on computer-mediated communication, spoken versus written text, and non-motor knowledge.
  • Stated: general cognitive and metacognitive skills may be biologically primary and unteachable, so studies claiming to teach them need far transfer tests. Evident: as a theoretical article, it presents no new empirical data and relies on selected prior studies rather than direct tests of the proposed evolutionary framework.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2

Cites

136 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 71 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Working memory limitations may have reduced significance when acquiring novel information that the human brain specifically has evolved to process, known as biologically primary information.

    “Working memory limitations may have reduced significance when acquiring novel information that the human brain specifically has evolved to process, known as biologically primary information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Geary 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geary 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Working memory limitations may be critical only when acquiring novel information based on culturally important knowledge that we have not specifically evolved to acquire.

    “Working memory limitations may be critical only when acquiring novel information based on culturally important knowledge that we have not specifically evolved to acquire.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Geary 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Geary 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Several cognitive load effects rely on biologically primary knowledge being used to facilitate the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge.

    “In this article, we suggest that several cognitive load effects rely on biologically primary knowledge being used to facilitate the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation

    Long-term memory is critically important to cognitive functioning, including problem solving.

    “They indicate the critical importance of long-term memory to cognitive functioning, including problem solving.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites de Groot 1965

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chiesi et al. 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Egan and Schwartz 1979 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The capacity and duration limits of working memory are eliminated when working memory deals with familiar information organized in long-term memory rather than unfamiliar information from the environment.

    “The capacity and duration limits of working memory are eliminated when working memory deals with familiar information organized in long-term memory rather than unfamiliar information from the environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ericsson and Kintsch 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A schema can be treated by working memory as a single element or used unconsciously after automation, so the limitations of working memory disappear for more knowledgeable learners when dealing with previously learned information stored in long-term memory.

    “Because a schema can be treated by working memory as a single element or used unconsciously after automation, the limitations of working memory disappear for more knowledgeable learners when dealing with previously learned information stored in long-term memory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Novel information is processed by a working memory that is limited in capacity to 4±1 elements of information and duration to about 20 s.

    “That novel information is processed by a working memory that is limited in capacity to 4±1 elements of information (Cowan 2001;Baddeley 1986;Miller 1956) and duration to about 20 s (Peterson and Peterson 1959).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cowan 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Baddeley 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Miller 1956 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under some instructional conditions, such as the use of dynamic visualizations to teach human motor skills, the tension between a limited working memory capacity and transient information seems to be non-existent, with animations being more effective than equivalent static graphics.

    “Interestingly, under some instructional conditions, such as the use of dynamic visualizations to teach human motor skills, this tension between a limited working memory capacity and transient information seems to be non-existent, with animations being more effective than equivalent static graphics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Höffler and Leutner 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The borrowing and reorganizing principle also applies to any information obtained from another human, resulting in collaborative learning environments providing an ideal example of the principle at work.

    “However, the principle also applies to any information obtained from another human, resulting in collaborative learning environments providing us with an ideal example of the principle at work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since we have evolved to communicate and coordinate information between each other, general communication and coordination processes are biologically primary.

    “Since we have evolved to communicate and coordinate information between each other, general communication and coordination processes are biologically primary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    People learn more deeply when the words in a multimedia presentation are in conversational style rather than formal style (personalization principle).

    “For example, people learn more deeply when the words in a multimedia presentation are in conversational style rather than formal style (the personalization principle: e.g., Mayer et al. 2004;Moreno and Mayer 2004)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mayer et al. 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moreno and Mayer 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The studies on the collective working memory effect were conducted in a traditional face-to-face collaborative learning context.

    “Another important characteristic of the studies on the collective working memory effect is that they were conducted in a traditional face-to-face collaborative learning context.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While communicating is likely to require some working memory resources, particularly for task-related aspects, there may be considerable advantages to being able to communicate when faced with acquiring complex, biologically secondary information.

    “As a consequence, while communicating is likely to require some working memory resources, particularly for the task-related aspects of the communication process, there may be considerable advantages to being able to communicate when faced with acquiring complex, biologically secondary information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The cognitive load theory motivated studies on the collective working memory effect were conducted under carefully structured and randomized learning conditions to isolate the cognitive effects of task complexity and minimize the effects of social and motivational factors on collaborative learning.

    “An important characteristic of the cognitive load theory motivated studies on the collective working memory effect is that they were conducted under carefully structured and randomized learning conditions to isolate the cognitive effects of task complexity and minimize the effects of social and motivational factors on collaborative learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Dynamic visualizations can be ineffective if they create high extraneous cognitive loads.

    “Cognitive load theorists have argued that dynamic visualizations can be ineffective if they create high extraneous cognitive loads (Ayres and Paas 2007a, b) defined as a cognitive load that can be avoided by changing an instructional design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ayres and Paas 2007a, b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    According to Reeves and Nass's media equation, people tend to treat new technologies as real people and places because the human brain has not evolved quickly enough to assimilate these technologies.

    “According to Reeves and Nass's (1996) media equation, people tend to treat new technologies as real people and places because the human brain has not evolved quickly enough to assimilate these technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reeves and Nass 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The results of Kirschner et al. experiments confirmed the interaction hypothesis that high cognitive load leads to more efficient collaborative learning than individual learning, while low cognitive load leads to more efficient individual learning than collaborative learning.

    “In general, the results of Kirschner et al. experiments confirmed this interaction hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kirschner et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mayer's social agency theory refers to the idea that social cues in multimedia instructional messages can prime a social response that leads to deeper cognitive processing and better learning outcomes.

    “One of the important research lines providing evidence for their claim is related to Mayer's (2005) social agency theory, which refers to the idea that social cues in multimedia instructional messages can prime a social response that leads to deeper cognitive processing and better learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mayer 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    People learn more deeply when the words in a multimedia message are spoken in a standard accented human voice rather than in a machine voice or foreign-accented human voice (voice principle).

    “or when the words in a multimedia message are spoken in a standard accented human voice rather than in a machine voice or foreign-accented human voice (voice principle, e.g., Atkinson et al. 2005;Mayer et al. 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Atkinson et al. 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mayer et al. 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These instructional manipulations reduce transient information and consequently the demands on working memory are reduced.

    “These instructional manipulations reduce transient information and consequently the demands on working memory are reduced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    In empirical work the precise general skills are frequently not specified, so it is unclear whether documented improvements are due to acquisition of an unspecified general skill or to improvement in biologically secondary, domain-specific knowledge.

    “Frequently, the precise skills are not specified in empirical work and so it is not clear whether any documented improvements are due to the acquisition of an unspecified general skill or due to an improvement in biologically secondary, domain-specific knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Where a skill is placed on that continuum may depend on the relative ratios of primary and secondary knowledge required.

    “Where a skill is placed on that continuum may depend on the relative ratios of primary and secondary knowledge required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This process seems to prime the execution of similar actions, which suggests that the mirror-neuron system mediates imitation, by priming execution of the same action.

    “Moreover, this process seems to prime the execution of similar actions, which suggests that the mirror-neuron system mediates imitation, by priming (i.e., preparing the brain for) execution of the same action (e.g., Iacoboni et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iacoboni et al. 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    At present, the clearest marker is whether most members of a population will acquire the skill without tuition.

    “At present, the clearest marker is whether most members of a population will acquire the skill without tuition.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    That increase may be due to biologically primary knowledge.

    “That increase may be due to biologically primary knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    We are able to acquire biologically secondary knowledge and may need to for cultural reasons but we have not specifically evolved to acquire that knowledge.

    “We are able to acquire biologically secondary knowledge and may need to for cultural reasons but we have not specifically evolved to acquire that knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The use of gestures and object manipulation are primary skills that do not need to be explicitly taught but can be used to acquire the secondary skills associated with instructional content.

    “The use of gestures and object manipulation are primary skills that do not need to be explicitly taught but can be used to acquire the secondary skills associated with instructional content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The modality effect has been explained within a cognitive load theory context by suggesting that effective working memory capacity is increased by using both auditory and visual processors.

    “The effect has been explained within a cognitive load theory context by suggesting that effective working memory capacity is increased by using both auditory and visual processors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Humans have evolved the ability to acquire certain types of knowledge effortlessly.

    “Van Gog et al. argued, based on Geary's (2008) biologically primary knowledge concept, that humans have evolved the ability to acquire certain types of knowledge effortlessly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geary 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that some of the skills currently the subject of extensive research programs consist largely of biologically primary knowledge.

    “It is possible that some of the skills currently the subject of extensive research programs consist largely of biologically primary knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The cognitive load benefits of gesturing were even higher when the gestures added information to the information conveyed by speech than when the gestures conveyed the same information as speech, while both resulted in a lower cognitive load than not gesturing.

    “They also found that the cognitive load benefits of gesturing were even higher when the gestures added information to the information conveyed by speech than when the gestures conveyed the same information as speech, while both resulted in a lower cognitive load than not gesturing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ping and Goldin-Meadow 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Gesture and object manipulation are sensorimotor experiences that could be considered as sources of biologically primary information and have been shown to assist in the acquisition of biologically secondary information.

    “Gesture and object manipulation are sensorimotor experiences that could be considered as sources of biologically primary information and have been shown to assist in the acquisition of biologically secondary information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the case of gestures and oral communication in a social context, we do not have to explicitly teach the required skills-they are unlikely to appear in any syllabus documents.

    “In the case of gestures and oral communication in a social context, we do not have to explicitly teach the required skills-they are unlikely to appear in any syllabus documents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reading is a biologically secondary activity while listening is biologically primary so the cognitive load associated with decoding written text may be relevant.

    “Reading is a biologically secondary activity while listening is biologically primary so the cognitive load associated with decoding written text may be relevant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Children need to manipulate objects to understand written text that they may be perfectly capable of understanding if the same information is presented in spoken form.

    “It is interesting to note that with regard to object manipulation, children need to manipulate objects to understand written text that they may be perfectly capable of understanding if the same information is presented in spoken form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both gesturing and object manipulation may be very old, very well-developed skills that are acquired easily and can be used with a minimal working memory load.

    “Both gesturing and object manipulation may be very old, very well-developed skills that are acquired easily and can be used with a minimal working memory load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologically primary information is modular with most primary skills probably evolving independently of each other and indeed, probably at different evolutionary epochs.
    • Rests on an assumption: We may have evolved the use of gestures before the use of speech and almost certainly evolved the use of object manipulation prior to speech.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Most general cognitive and metacognitive strategies are biologically primary skills that humans acquire automatically at a very young age because they are essential for survival.

    “We suspect the same can be said for most general cognitive and metacognitive strategies.We may automatically acquire them at a very young age because they are biologically primary skills essential for human survival.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cognitive representations of symbols like numbers and letters are ultimately based on sensorimotor codes within a generalized system that was originally developed to control an organism's motor behavior and perceive the world around it, which has resulted in automaticity of perceptual and motor resonance mechanisms in cognitive tasks.

    “Cognitive representa-tions of symbols like numbers and letters are ultimately based on sensorimotor codes within a generalized system that was originally developed to control an organism's motor behavior and perceive the world around it, which has resulted in automaticity of perceptual and motor resonance mechanisms in cognitive tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Children and adults who were allowed to gesture while explaining how they solved the mathematics problem experienced a lower cognitive load because they could remember more items than when they were not allowed to gesture.

    “Goldin-Meadow et al. found that children and adults, who were allowed to gesture while explaining how they solved the mathematics problem, experienced a lower cognitive load because they could remember more items than when they were not allowed to gesture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goldin-Meadow et al. 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    We have evolved to acquire biologically primary knowledge in modular form.

    “We have evolved to acquire biologically primary knowledge in modular form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Biologically primary information is modular with most primary skills probably evolving independently of each other and indeed, probably at different evolutionary epochs.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both studies (Wong et al. 2009; Ayres et al. 2009) found superior performance when learners observed a dynamic representation rather than a static representation and when they manually had to complete the tasks (observe and imitate).

    “Both studies found superior performance when learners observed a dynamic representation rather than a static representation and when they manually had to complete the tasks (observe and imitate).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wong et al. 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ayres et al. 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Very general, biologically secondary cognitive or metacognitive skills may not exist if humans have evolved to acquire important general skills.

    “Such biologically secondary skills may not exist if we have evolved to acquire important, general skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under those circumstances, the modality effect may disappear or even reverse, with written text being superior to spoken text.

    “Under those circumstances, the modality effect may disappear or even reverse, with written text being superior to spoken text (Leahy and Sweller 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leahy and Sweller 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decoding biologically primary spoken text may impose a minimal cognitive load compared with decoding biologically secondary written text and so the assistance of object manipulation may be unnecessary when dealing with spoken text.

    “Decoding biologically primary spoken text may impose a minimal cognitive load compared with decoding biologically secondary written text and so the assistance of object manipulation may be unnecessary when dealing with spoken text.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    All explanations can be interpreted as examples of biologically primary knowledge associated with gesturing assisting in the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge.

    “All explanations can be interpreted as examples of biologically primary knowledge associated with gesturing assisting in the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    An alternative explanation is that gesturing shifts some of the load from verbal working memory to other cognitive systems.

    “An alternative explanation is that gesturing shifts some of the load from verbal working memory to other cognitive systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many skills may consist of a combination of primary and secondary knowledge and so we may be dealing more with a continuum than a dichotomy.

    “It also should be noted that many skills may consist of a combination of primary and secondary knowledge and so we may be dealing more with a continuum than a dichotomy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The human movement effect demonstrates that we are able to overcome transience and the resultant cognitive load of animations if those animations deal with human motor movement because we may have evolved to readily acquire motor movement knowledge as a primary skill.

    “The human movement effect demonstrates that we are able to overcome transience and the resultant cognitive load of animations if those animations deal with human motor movement because we may have evolved to readily acquire motor movement knowledge as a primary skill.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If means-ends analysis is a biologically primary skill and we have evolved to use the strategy without explicit tuition, attempting to teach it is likely to be ineffective.

    “If means-ends analysis is a biologically primary skill and we have evolved to use the strategy without explicit tuition, attempting to teach it is likely to be ineffective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: We are likely to have evolved general skills such as, for example, general problem solving.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Demonstrating physical manipulation to reach a goal (natural pedagogy) is a biologically primary skill that does not need to be part of a formal curriculum because we engage in it automatically.

    “The act of demonstrating physical manipulation is a complex act but we do not need to make it part of any formal curriculum because we engage in that natural pedagogy automatically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Csibra and Gergely (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Organizing general skills to assist in the acquisition of subject matter knowledge may be more productive than attempting to teach skills that we have evolved to acquire automatically.

    “Organizing general skills to assist in the acquisition of subject matter knowledge may be more productive than attempting to teach skills that we have evolved to acquire automatically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    General skills, although primary in nature and essentially unteachable because they are acquired automatically, are not instructionally unimportant.

    “While general skills may be primary in nature and so essentially unteachable because they are acquired automatically, it does not follow that they are instructionally unimportant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Collaboration can increase the fitness of collaborators when together they can access more resources than when working individually.

    “Although this seems to predispose individuals to selfishness, collaboration can increase the fitness of the collaborators when together they can access more resources than when working individually.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For individuals, the best strategy is to let other learners devote their cognitive resources to solving the problem and then gain an advantage from the solution.

    “Yet for individuals, the best strategy seems to consist in allowing the other learners to devote their cognitive resources to solving the problem and then to gain an advantage from the solution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biologically primary information is modular with most primary skills probably evolving independently of each other and indeed, probably at different evolutionary epochs.

    “Biologically primary information is modular with most primary skills probably evolving independently of each other and indeed, probably at different evolutionary epochs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    We may have evolved the use of gestures before the use of speech and almost certainly evolved the use of object manipulation prior to speech.

    “We may have evolved the use of gestures before the use of speech and almost certainly evolved the use of object manipulation prior to speech.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    We may have evolved to listen to someone discussing an object while looking at it.

    “We may have evolved to listen to someone discussing an object while looking at it.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    We are likely to have evolved general skills such as, for example, general problem solving.

    “We are likely to have evolved general skills such as, for example, general problem solving.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paas and Sweller (2012) used Geary's concept of biologically primary knowledge to explain that humans have evolved the ability to learn from observing others engage in action and copy it effortlessly.

    “Paas and Sweller (2012) used Geary ' s (2008) concept of biologically primary knowledge to explain that humans have evolved the ability to learn from observing others engage in action and copy it effortlessly.”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Paas and Sweller (2012)

    The Human Movement Effect section uses Geary’s concept to discuss learning by observing and imitating human movement. But it frames the evolved ability to observe and copy movement as a possibility (“If ... we have evolved”), while “effortlessly” describes acquiring certain types of knowledge more generally. The claim presents that specific ability more definitively than the paper does; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While attempts to teach biologically primary, generic-cognitive skills are doubted to be successful, they can be used to assist in teaching biologically secondary, domain-specific skills.

    “While we doubt that attempts to teach biologically primary, generic-cognitive skills will be successful, they can be used to assist in teaching biologically secondary, domain-specific skills (Paas and Sweller 2012).”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Paas and Sweller 2012

  • Biologically primary information, such as human movement, is at most marginally affected by working memory limitations.

    “Together with the cognitive load theory view that biologically primary information, such as human movement, is at most marginally affected by working memory limitations (Paas and Sweller 2012)”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Paas and Sweller 2012

  • These innate faculties are thought to be modular.

    “These faculties are thought to be modular”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Paas & Sweller, 2012

  • Humans have a set of innate capabilities, such as being able to speak or to recognize faces, that do not require explicit instruction.

    “humans have a set of certain innate capabilities, such as being able to speak or to recognize faces, that do not require explicit instruction”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Paas & Sweller, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Katz, D. (1960). Social psychology. In D. Katz & R. Katz (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed.). Basel/Stuttgart: Schwabe.
  2. Mason, R. (1991). Analyzing computer conferencing interactions. International Journal of Adult Education and Training, 2, 161–173.
  3. Perry, M., Berch, D., & Singleton, J. L. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonverbal input in learning contexts. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213–236.
  4. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Sloffer, S. J., Dueber, B., & Duffy, T. M. (1999). Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical Thinking: Two implementations in higher education (CRLT technical report no. 8-99). Bloomington: Indiana University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paas, F., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Paas, Fred
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
27-45
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2046966022
Cited by
502
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Keywords
cognitive load theory, evolutionary psychology, human cognitive architecture, working memory limitations, cultural knowledge, motor system, collaboration, complex cognitive tasks, teaching methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review