Cited by 23Digital Media Forensic DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Fine-Grained Multimodal DeepFake Classification via Heterogeneous Graphs

Yin, Qilin, Lu, Wei, Cao, Xiaochun, Luo, Xiangyang, Zhou, Yicong, Huang, Jiwu·2024·International Journal of Computer Vision

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11263-024-02128-1

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent multimodal deepfake detection research has begun to exploit richer behavioral and biometric correspondences between face, voice, and motion.

    “Beyond temporal synchronization, recent multimodal deepfake detection research has begun to exploit richer behavioral and biometric correspondences between face, voice, and motion [16-20].”

    From A Review of Tools and Technologies to Combat Deepfakes (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, Q., Lu, W., Cao, X., Luo, X., Zhou, Y., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Shenzhen MSU-BIT University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Wei
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2024-06-06
Volume
132
Issue
11
Pages
5255-5269
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W4399380497
Cited by
23
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U2001202, 62072480, U19B2022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
deepfake detection, fine-grained classification, heterogeneous graphs, graph attention networks, audio-video synchronization, cross-modal interaction, graph pooling, video forgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review