The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In their 2005 review of the literature, Lösel and Schmucker found that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending.
“Indeed, Lösel and Schmucker found in their 2005 review of the literature that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending (Lösel 2005).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
Interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending.
“Lösel and Schmucker found in their 2005 review of the literature that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending (Lösel 2005).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
Current practice recommends that complementary psychological interventions be employed alongside pharmacological agents.
“current practice recommends that complementary psychological interventions be employed alongside pharmacological agents (Lösel 2005; Briken 2007)”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
Our restriction to studies with a randomised design explains why our conclusions are discrepant with those of other reviews that included evidence from non-randomised trials.
“An additional limitation was our restriction to studies with a randomised design, which explains why our conclusions are discrepant with those of other reviews (e.g., Lösel 2005), which included evidence from non-randomised trials.”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review found a large effect size for surgical castration (OR 15.34; 95% CI 7.34 to 32.05; eight studies).
“Main results featured a large effect size for surgical castration (odds ratio (OR) 15.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.34 to 32.05; eight studies)”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
Lösel and Schmucker's systematic review of controlled outcome studies of all relevant interventions included 80 comparisons involving data from 22,181 participants.
“Lösel and Schmucker conducted a thorough systematic review of controlled outcome studies of all relevant interventions, which included 80 comparisons involving data from 22,181 participants (Lösel 2005).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review cast its net very widely, with 60% of the studies considered to be of non-equivalent design (only six were RCTs).
“Similarly, the review by Lösel and Schmucker cast its net very widely, with 60% of the studies considered to be of non-equivalent design (only six were RCTs) (Lösel 2005).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review included data from both published and unpublished studies reported up to June 2003.
“This review included data from both published and unpublished studies reported up to June 2003.”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review found a moderate effect size for CBT (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.86; 35 studies).
“This compared to a moderate effect size for CBT (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.86; 35 studies).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review found a reasonably large effect size for hormonal treatment (OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.40 to 6.79; six studies).
“and a reasonably large effect size for hormonal treatment (OR 3.08; 95% CI 1.40 to 6.79; six studies).”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
In the Lösel and Schmucker review, 11.1% of treated offenders and 17.5% of controls showed sexual recidivism (a 37% difference) when both pharmacological and psychological treatments were considered.
“Overall, 11.1% of the treated offenders and 17.5% of the controls showed sexual recidivism (a 37% difference) when both pharmacological and psychological treatments were considered.”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
The Lösel and Schmucker review's authors noted that the interventions were effective in reducing reoffending in general.
“The authors also noted that the interventions were effective in reducing reoffending in general.”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Lösel 2005
Cites
1 retracted
Managements for people with disorders of sexual preference and for convicted sexual offenders
White, P., Bradley, C., Ferriter, M., & Hatzipetrou, L. (1998) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000251 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
RetractedSexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies
Hall, G. C. N. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.63.5.802 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Evaluation of a National Prison-based Treatment Program for Sexual Offenders in England and Wales
Friendship, C., Mann, R. E., & Beech, A. R. (2003) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260503253236 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Treatment of sex offenders with imaginal desensitization and/or medroxyprogesterone
McConaghy, N., Blaszczynski, A., & Kidson, W. (1988) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1988.tb05101.x · Cited by 87 · see citing works
When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work”?
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M., & Yang, S.-M. (2003) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716202250782 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553 · see citing works
The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1 · Cited by 3,445 · see citing works
“…offenders in particular, physical treatments, such as surgical castration and hormonal treatment, were demonstrated to have greater efficacy in reducing sexual recidivism in comparison to CBT, with large significant odds ratios for both of these alternative interventions (Lösel & Schmucker, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment Also Apply To Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis
Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854809338545 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies
Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Publication bias as a threat to the validity of meta-analytic results
Rothstein, H. R. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9046-9 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Beaudry, G., Yu, R., Perry, A. E., & Fazel, S. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00170-x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe
Koehler, J. A., Lösel, F., Akoensi, T. D., & Humphreys, D. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-012-9159-7 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationPetrosino, A., & Soydan, H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-005-3540-8 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Langstrom, N., Enebrink, P., Lauren, E.-M., Lindblom, J., Werko, S., & Hanson, R. K. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f4630 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending
Khan, O., Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Powney, M. J., Dennis, J. A., & Duggan, C. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007989.pub2 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending
Dennis, J. A., Khan, O., Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Powney, M. J., & Duggan, C. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007507.pub2 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Thibaut, F., Cosyns, P., Fedoroff, J. P., Briken, P., Goethals, K., Bradford, J. M. W., & The WFSBP Task Force on Paraphilias (2020) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2020.1744723 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for Chinese people: A meta-analysis
Ng, T. K., & Wong, D. F. K. (2018) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867417741555 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Byrne, G., & Ní Ghráda, Á. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.01.001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Larochelle, S., Diguer, L., Laverdière, O., Gamache, D., Greenman, P. S., & Descôteaux, J. (2010) · Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic · doi:10.1521/bumc.2010.74.1.1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- L�sel, F., & Schmucker, M.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Criminology
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-146
- ISSN
- 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3750
- OpenAlex
- W2087485028
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 29.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Keywords
- sex offender treatment, sexual recidivism, violent recidivism, cognitive behavioral therapy, orchiectomy, psychosocial interventions, treatment effectiveness, randomized controlled trials, treatment discontinuation, program completion, outcome reporting quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review