Cited by 806Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis

L�sel, Friedrich, Schmucker, Martin·2005·Journal of Experimental Criminology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In their 2005 review of the literature, Lösel and Schmucker found that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending.

    “Indeed, Lösel and Schmucker found in their 2005 review of the literature that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending (Lösel 2005).”
  • Interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending.

    “Lösel and Schmucker found in their 2005 review of the literature that interventions for sexual offending had an equivalent effect in reducing non-sexual offending (Lösel 2005).”
  • Current practice recommends that complementary psychological interventions be employed alongside pharmacological agents.

    “current practice recommends that complementary psychological interventions be employed alongside pharmacological agents (Lösel 2005; Briken 2007)”
  • Our restriction to studies with a randomised design explains why our conclusions are discrepant with those of other reviews that included evidence from non-randomised trials.

    “An additional limitation was our restriction to studies with a randomised design, which explains why our conclusions are discrepant with those of other reviews (e.g., Lösel 2005), which included evidence from non-randomised trials.”
  • The Lösel and Schmucker review found a large effect size for surgical castration (OR 15.34; 95% CI 7.34 to 32.05; eight studies).

    “Main results featured a large effect size for surgical castration (odds ratio (OR) 15.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.34 to 32.05; eight studies)”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
L�sel, F., & Schmucker, M.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2005-04
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
117-146
ISSN
  • 1572-8315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3750
OpenAlex
W2087485028
Cited by
806
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 53
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
sex offender treatment, sexual recidivism, violent recidivism, cognitive behavioral therapy, orchiectomy, psychosocial interventions, treatment effectiveness, randomized controlled trials, treatment discontinuation, program completion, outcome reporting quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review