Cited by 569Heavy metals in environmentAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil

Yang, Xing, Liu, Jingjing, McGrouther, Kim, Huang, Huagang, Lu, Kouping, Guo, Xi, He, Lizhi, Lin, Xiaoming +3 more·2016·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Biochar is a carbon-rich solid material derived from the pyrolysis of agricultural and forest residual biomass. Previous studies have shown that biochar is suitable as an adsorbent for soil contaminants such as heavy metals and consequently reduces their bioavailability. However, the long-term effect of different biochars on metal extractability or soil health has not been assessed. Therefore, a 1-year incubation experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of biochar produced from bamboo and rice straw (at temperatures ≥500 °C) on the heavy metal (cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)) extractability and enzyme activity (urease, catalase, and acid phosphatase) in a contaminated sandy loam paddy soil. Three rates (0, 1, and 5%) and two mesh sizes (<0.25 and <1 mm) of biochar applications were investigated. After incubation, the physicochemical properties, extractable heavy metals, available phosphorus, and enzyme activity of soil samples were analyzed. The results demonstrated that rice straw biochar significantly (P < 0.05) increased the pH, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity of the soil, especially at the 5% application rate. Both bamboo and rice straw biochar significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the concentration of CaCl2-extractable heavy metals as biochar application rate increased. The heavy metal extractability was significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with pH, water-soluble organic carbon, and available phosphorus in soil. The 5% application rate of fine rice straw biochar resulted in the greatest reductions of extractable Cu and Zn, 97.3 and 62.2%, respectively. Both bamboo and rice straw biochar were more effective at decreasing extractable Cu and Pb than removing extractable Cd and Zn from the soil. Urease activity increased by 143 and 107% after the addition of 5% coarse and fine rice straw biochars, respectively. Both bamboo and rice straw biochars significantly (P < 0.05) increased catalase activity but had no significant impact on acid phosphatase activity. In conclusion, the rice straw biochar had greater potential as an amendment for reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals in soil than that of the bamboo biochar. The impact of biochar treatment on heavy metal extractability and enzyme activity varied with the biochar type, application rate, and particle size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-015-4233-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biochar is often regarded as an environmentally friendly and efficient sorbent for immobilizing heavy metals in aqueous environments and/or in pore water of soils and sediments due to its large specific surface area, surface functional groups, microporous structure, high CEC, and high pH.

    “Due to its large specific surface area (SSA), a variety of surface functional groups (hydroxyl, phenolic, carboxyl), microporous structure, high cation exchange capacity (CEC), and high pH, biochar is often regarded as an environmentally friendly and efficient sorbent for immobilizing heavy metals in aqueous environments and/or in pore water of soils and sediments (Zhang et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, X., Liu, J., McGrouther, K., Huang, H., Lu, K., Guo, X., He, L., Lin, X., Che, L., Ye, Z., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • Scion (NZ)
  • Huzhou Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Lu, Kouping
  • Wang, Hailong
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2015-03-14
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
974-984
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W2081610884
Cited by
569
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5
FWCI
19.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, heavy metal bioavailability, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, soil enzyme activity, urease, catalase, acid phosphatase, rice straw biochar, bamboo biochar, paddy soil, soil remediation, soil amendment, particle size, biochar application rate, soil pH, available phosphorus, water-soluble organic carbon, cation exchange capacity
MeSH terms
Biological Availability, Cadmium, Charcoal, Copper, Lead, Phosphorus, Oryza, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Zinc, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review