Cited by 6Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Exploring indirect photolysis of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate in landfill leachate under simulated sunlight: effect of humic acid and nitrate

Hamid, Hanna, Li, Loretta Y., Grace, John R.·2021·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Landfill leachate is exposed to sunlight through on- and off-site leachate treatment and disposal to surface water bodies. Very little is known about the potential phototransformation of fluorotelomer compounds in landfill leachates, which can undergo environmental oxidation and produce perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs). This study investigated phototransformation of spiked 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (FTS) (∼ 100 μg/L) in leachate under simulated sunlight, using a metal halide lamp (wavelength, 390 to 750 nm). To understand the effects of nitrate and humic acid (HA), phosphate buffer (pH 7.1) containing nitrate and HA were spiked with 6:2 FTS and irradiated under simulated sunlight for 72 h. Following irradiation, 6:2 FTS and known transformation products (i.e., PFCAs) were quantified in the samples using LC-MS/MS. The results showed that 6:2 FTS was undergoing indirect photolysis in leachate (half-life of ∼ 15 days), suggesting that indirect photolysis of 6:2 FTS is likely a relevant transformation pathway in sunlit aquatic environments. However, the spiked 6:2 FTS did not show any observable decrease in the presence of nitrate and HA over 72 h. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) increased in irradiated leachate background samples (without 6:2 FTS spike) suggesting that phototransformation in sunlit leachate could lead to the formation of persistent PFCAs at environmental concentrations of the precursors. Future studies using probe compounds are recommended to better understand the roles of reactive species in phototransformation of 6:2 FTS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-020-11417-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamid, H., Li, L. Y., & Grace, J. R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Li, Loretta Y.
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
9508-9516
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W3097875650
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 185040-13, RGPIN 2018-03832, CGSD3-475849-2015, RGPIN 7111-11)
  • Schlumberger Foundation (Faculty for Future Fellowship)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate, indirect photolysis, landfill leachate, simulated sunlight, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorohexanoic acid, nitrate, humic acid, photochemical transformation, PFAS precursors, half-life, reactive species
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Humic Substances, Nitrates, Photolysis, Sunlight, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review