Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient representations of binarized health deficit data: the frailty index and beyond

Pridham, Glen, Rockwood, Kenneth, Rutenberg, Andrew·2023·GeroScience

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11357-022-00723-z

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A one-dimensional representation of the complex biochemistry and phenotypes of aging is supported by analyses of aging data.

    “The possibility of such a one-dimensional representation of the complex biochemistry and phenotypes of aging21–25 is supported by analyses of aging data26–30.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Kennedy BK, et al. (2014) Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell 159:709–13 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K (2018) Frailty index as a predictor of mortality. Syst Rev Meta-Anal Age Ageing 47:193–200 · DOI
  3. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med 31:3–10 · DOI
  4. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8:24 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Howlett SE, Rockwood MRH, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K (2014) Standard laboratory tests to identify older adults at increased risk of death. BMC Med 12:171 · DOI
  6. Blodgett JM, Rockwood K, Theou O (2021) Changes in the severity and lethality of age-related health deficit accumulation in the USA between 1999 and 2018: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Health Longev 2:e96–104 · DOI
  7. Kirkwood TB (2005) Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell 120:437–47 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Freund A (2019) Untangling aging using dynamic, organism-level phenotypic networks. Cell Syst 8:172–81 · DOI
  9. Jansen R, et al. (2021) An integrative study of five biological clocks in somatic and mental health. Elife 10:e59479 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Li X, et al. (2020) Longitudinal trajectories, correlations and mortality associations of nine biological ages across 20-years follow-up. Elife :9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Farrell S, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K, Rutenberg AD (2022) Interpretable machine learning for high-dimensional trajectories of aging health. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1009746 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Palliyaguru DL, Moats JM, Di Germanio C, Bernier M, de Cabo R (2019) Frailty index as a biomarker of lifespan and healthspan: focus on pharmacological interventions. Mech Ageing Dev 180:42–48 · DOI
  13. Zierer J, Menni C, Kastenmüller G, Spector TD (2015) Integration of ‘omics’ data in aging research: from biomarkers to systems biology. Aging Cell 14:933–44 · DOI
  14. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Springer, New York · DOI · Paper page
  15. Adragni KP, Cook RD (2009) Sufficient dimension reduction and prediction in regression. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 367:4385–405
  16. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A (2007) Frailty fitness, and the mathematics of deficit accumulation. Rev Clin Gerontol 17:1–12 · DOI
  17. Howlett SE, Rutenberg AD, Rockwood K (2021) The degree of frailty as a translational measure of health in aging. Nature Aging 1:651–65 · DOI
  18. Blodgett JM, Theou O, Howlett SE, Wu FCW, Rockwood K (2016) A frailty index based on laboratory deficits in community-dwelling men predicted their risk of adverse health outcomes. Age Ageing 45:463–8 · DOI
  19. Blodgett JM, et al. (2022) Frailty indices based on self-report, blood-based biomarkers and examination-based data in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Age Ageing 51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac075 · DOI
  20. Higgins-Chen AT, et al. (2022) A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. Nature Aging 2:644–61 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Cohen AA, et al. (2015) Detection of a novel, integrative aging process suggests complex physiological integration. PLoS ONE 10:e0116489 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nakazato Y, et al. (2020) Estimation of homeostatic dysregulation and frailty using biomarker variability: a principal component analysis of hemodialysis patients. Sci Rep 10:10314 · DOI
  23. Entwistle MR, Schweizer D, Cisneros R (2021) Dietary patterns related to total mortality and cancer mortality in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 32:1279–88 · DOI
  24. Elhaik E (2022) Principal component analyses (PCA)-based findings in population genetic studies are highly biased and must be reevaluated. Sci Rep 12:14683 · DOI
  25. Widagdo IS, Pratt N, Russell M, Roughead EE (2016) Construct validity of four frailty measures in an older Australian population: a Rasch analysis. J Frailty Aging 5:78–81
  26. Gross AL, et al. (2020) Derivation of a measure of physiological multisystem dysregulation: results from WHAS and health ABC. Mech Ageing Dev 188:111258 · DOI
  27. Kuo H-K, Leveille SG, Yu Y-H, Milberg WP (2007) Cognitive function, habitual gait speed, and late-life disability in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2002. Gerontology 53:102–10 · DOI
  28. Landgraf AJ, Lee Y (2020) Dimensionality reduction for binary data through the projection of natural parameters. J Multivar Anal 180:104668 · DOI
  29. Schein AI, Saul LK, Ungar LH (2003) A generalized linear model for principal component analysis of binary data. In: Bishop CM, Frey BJ (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics, vol. R4 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR, Key West FL, pp 240–247
  30. Manton KG, Woodbury MA (1991) Grade of membership generalizations and aging research. Exp Aging Res 17:217–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739108253899 · DOI
  31. Stallard E (2007) Trajectories of morbidity, disability, and mortality among the U.S. elderly population. N Am Actuar J 11:16–53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10920277.2007.10597465 · DOI
  32. Erosheva EA, Fienberg SE, Joutard C (2007) Describing disability through individual-level mixture models for multivariate binary data. Ann Appl Stat 1:346–84. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aoas126 · DOI
  33. Pridham G, Rockwood K, Rutenberg A (2022) Strategies for handling missing data that improve frailty index estimation and predictive power: Lessons from the NHANES dataset. GeroScience 44:897 · DOI
  34. Blodgett JM, Theou O, Howlett SE, Rockwood K (2017) A frailty index from common clinical and laboratory tests predicts increased risk of death across the life course. Geroscience 39:447–55 · DOI
  35. Wilhelm-Leen ER, Hall YN, K Tamura M, Chertow GM (2009) Frailty and chronic kidney disease: the third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey. Am J Med 122:664–71.e2 · DOI
  36. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2010) mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45:1–68
  37. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011) Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 30:377–99 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sterne JAC, et al. (2009) Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 338:b2393 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32–35 · DOI
  40. Yin J, Tian L (2014) Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index. Stat Med 33:985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5992 · DOI
  41. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 33:1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc2929880/ · DOI · Paper page
  42. Fried LP, et al. (2021) The physical frailty syndrome as a transition from homeostatic symphony to cacophony. Nat Aging 1:36–46 · DOI
  43. Gao JB, Cao Y, Lee J-M (2003) Principal component analysis of 1/fα noise. Phys Lett A 314:392–400 · DOI
  44. Lipsitz LA, Goldberger AL (1992) Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging: potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA 267:1806–9 · DOI
  45. Fulop T, et al. (2010) Aging, frailty and age-related diseases. Biogerontology 11:547–63 · DOI
  46. Theou O, Rockwood MRH, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K (2012) Co-morbidity in relation to frailty disability how much do they overlap? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 55:e1–e8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494312000489 · DOI
  47. Klemera P, Doubal S (2006) A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mech Ageing Dev 127:240–48 · DOI
  48. Alberti KGMM, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2006) Metabolic syndrome–a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med 23:469–80 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Cook DG, Shaper AG, Thelle DS, Whitehead TP (1986) Serum uric acid, serum glucose and diabetes: relationships in a population study. Postgrad Med J 62:1001–6 · DOI
  50. Kant AK, Whitley MI, Graubard BI (2014) Away from home meals: associations with biomarkers of chronic disease and dietary intake in American adults, NHANES 2005–2010. Int J Obes 39:820–7 · DOI
  51. Li Q, et al. (2015) Homeostatic dysregulation proceeds in parallel in multiple physiological systems. Aging Cell 14:1103–12 · DOI
  52. Nie C, et al. (2022) Distinct biological ages of organs and systems identified from a multi-omics study. Cell Rep 38:110459 · DOI
  53. Thomas VS, Rockwood K, McDowell I (1998) Multidimensionality in instrumental and basic activities of daily living. J Clin Epidemiol 51:315–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00292-8 · DOI
  54. Mitnitski A, Rockwood K (2016) The rate of aging: the rate of deficit accumulation does not change over the adult life span. Biogerontology 17:199–204 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Theou O, et al. (2015) Measuring frailty using self-report and test-based health measures. Age Ageing 44:471–77 · DOI
  56. Wallace LMK, Theou O, Pena F, Rockwood K, Andrew MK (2015) Social vulnerability as a predictor of mortality and disability: cross-country differences in the survey of health, aging, and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Aging Clin Exp Res 27:365–72 · DOI
  57. Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401:788–91 · DOI
  58. Mehta P, et al. (2019) A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Phys Rep 810:1–124 · DOI
  59. Schölkopf B, Smola A, Müller K-R (1998) Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput 10:1299–319 · DOI
  60. Byron FW, Fuller RW (1992) Mathematics of classical and quantum physics. Dover, Reading MA
  61. Aldrovandi R (2001) Special matrices of mathematical physics: stochastic, circulant, and bell matrices. World Scientific, Singapore · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pridham, G., Rockwood, K., & Rutenberg, A.
Venue
GeroScience
Published
2023-01-27
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
1687-1711
ISSN
2509-2723
Cited by
17
References
6
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 2019-05888)
  • Institute of Aging (PJT-156114)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review