CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 208Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Building Design and AssessmentLife Cycle Costing Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results

Aktas, Can B., Bilec, Melissa M.·2012·The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
DOI 10.1007/s11367-011-0363-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11367-011-0363-x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ang GKI, Wyatt DP (1999) Performance concept in the procurement of durability and serviceability of buildings. In: Lacasse MA, Vanier DJ (eds) 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components (DBMC). NRC Research, Vancouver, Canada, pp 1821–1832
  2. ASTM (2003) G 172—Standard guide for statistical analysis of accelerated service life data. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA
  3. ASTM (2005) G 166—Standard guide for statistical analysis of service life data. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
  4. Bare JC, Norris GA, Pennington DW, McKone T (2003) The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J Ind Ecol 6(3–4):49–78
  5. Census (1999) 1999 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  6. Census (2001) 2001 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  7. Census (2003) 2003 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  8. Census (2005) 2005 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  9. Census (2007) 2007 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  10. Census (2009a) 2009 AHS National Data, ASCII version. Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  11. Census (2009b) Table 1.1—Introductory characteristics. 2009 American Housing Survey. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  12. Census (2009c) Table 2–3. Size of unit and lot—occupied units. 2009 American Housing Survey. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC
  13. Friedman A, Callis B (2008) Table 16—year building built. New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey. US Census Bureau, New York
  14. Guequirre NMJ, Kristinsson J (1999) Product features that influence the end of a building. In: Lacasse MA, Vanier DJ (eds) 8th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components (DBMC). NRC Research Press, Vancouver, Canada, pp 2021–2032
  15. Kelly DJ (2007) BRE, Design life of buildings—a scoping study. Scottish Building Standards Agency, Glasgow
  16. Nicholson K (2009) Codebook for the American Housing Survey, Public Use File: 1997 and later. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fairfax, VA
  17. Palisade (2009) Guide to Using @RISK—Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-In for Microsoft Excel, Version 5.5. Palisade Corporation, Ithaca, NY
  18. Palmeri J (2010) A Life cycle approach to prioritizing methods of preventing waste from the residential construction sector in the state of Oregon, phase 2 report. Department of Environmental Quality, State of Oregon
  19. Plat HT (1999) Optimisation of the life span of building components. In: Lacasse MA, Vanier DJ (eds) 8th International Conference on the Durability of Building Materials and Components. NRC Research Press, Vancouver, Canada, pp 2118–2125
  20. Seiders D, Ahluwalia G, Melman S, Quint R, Chaluvadi A, Liang M, Silverberg A, Bechler C (2007) Study of life expectancy of home components. National Association of Home Builders, Washington, DC
  21. van Nunen H, Hendriks NA (2002) A solution to environmental pressure and housing convenience. In: 9th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components (DBMC), Brisbane, Australia 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 208

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aktas, C. B., & Bilec, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Aktas, Can B.
ORCID
Venue
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-12-16
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
337-349
ISSN
  • 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7502
DOI
10.1007/s11367-011-0363-x
OpenAlex
W2088799927
Cited by
208
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
Keywords
building lifetime, residential buildings, interior renovation, interior finishes, life cycle inventory, probability distributions, Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, sensitivity analysis, embodied energy, life cycle energy consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review