Modelling of different circular end-of-use scenarios for smartphones
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Purpose Repairing, refurbishing and remanufacturing are three strategies of the Circular Economy (CE), aiming at closing product cycles and maintaining materials and resources in the product cycle as long as possible. This paper analyses the environmental impacts of these three circular end-of-use scenarios (repairing, refurbishing and part remanufacturing) when performed on a common, “non-circular” smartphone. The underlying data used for this paper partly have been result of the Horizon 2020 project sustainablySMART, where circular product concepts have been developed and analysed in detail. Methods To analyse the environmental impacts of different circular end-of-use scenarios of smartphones, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is performed. For considering the impact of a smartphone’s first life (e.g. materials, production), an economic allocation is used. Since the goal of the study was to better understand the environmental impacts of processing routes that enable multiple life cycles of a product, allocation according to the economic value is applied instead of applying system expansion. As system expansion provides just an aggregated view of the first and second product life cycles and no decision support at the end of the first life regarding the relevant CE strategy can be given. The economic allocation is based on the ratio between the residual market value and the original price from the scenario’s input stream of smartphones of the respective end-of-use scenario. To reach comparability of the results, a second-use-time-parameter is defined for each scenario. This parameter takes into account that the second use time reaches only a certain share from the average smart phone use time. Results This study shows that through all three circular strategies, a reduction in the investigated impact categories—Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP)—can be achieved. Conclusions The analysed end-of-use scenarios repairing and refurbishing show the highest potential for smartphones in terms of Circular Economy, as most of the environmental impacts can be allocated to the device production, and the impact of additional steps to perform CE-strategies (e.g. collection of discarded phones, refurbishing) is rather low.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prolonging the active use phase through strategies like reuse, repair and refurbishment can deliver greater environmental benefits than improving recycling rates alone by avoiding carbon- and resource-intensive manufacturing of new devices.
“Although improving recycling rates is necessary, studies demonstrate that prolonging the active use phase through strategies like reuse, repair and refurbishment can deliver greater environmental benefits by avoiding the carbon-and resource-intensive manufacturing of new devices (Pamminger et al. 2021).”
From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Pamminger et al. 2021
Section 4.2 reports lower global-warming and resource-depletion impacts for repair and refurbishment than for a linear smartphone scenario; section 5.1 links reuse of components to reduced production of new parts. The paper does not compare these strategies with improving recycling rates alone: section 3 says final end-of-life processes, including material recovery, are outside its scope. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA systemic approach to value creation necessitates optimising for end-of-life value recovery through design choices that enable easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery.
“Such a systemic approach also necessitates optimising for EoL value recovery through design choices that enable easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery (Pamminger et al. 2021;Gómez et al. 2023).”
From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Pamminger et al. 2021
The Goal and scope section says the paper guides decisions about circular end-of-use strategies for smartphones, supporting the broad point about considering value after first use. But it explicitly excludes design changes to ease those strategies, and the Method section excludes final end-of-life material recovery. The paper therefore does not support the specific prescription for easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wieser, H., & Tröger, N. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.106 · Cited by 205 · cited 10× · see citing works
“…working smartphone for a use time of 2.5 years), second-use-timeparameters for each scenario are defined: This parameter takes into account that the average second use time is shorter than in the first use phase of 2.5 years, as assumed in the declared unit (Wieser and Tröger 2017; Proske et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ercan E, Kimfalk E (2016) Life Cycle Assessment of a smartphone, 4th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2016), Stockholm
- Janusz S et al (2016) Challenges of reuse and remanufacturing of modern chips in smart mobile devices. Electronics Goes Green Conference Jkielty (2019) The smartphone upgrade cycle-visualized. https :// devic eatla s.com/blog/smart phone -upgra de-cycle -visua lized . Accessed 16 July 2019
- Kopacek B (2016) Intelligent disassembly of components from printed circuit boards to enable re-use and more efficient recovery of criti- cal metals. IFAC Conf Paper, Elsevier, https ://www.scien cedir ect. com/scien ce/artic le/pii/S2405 89631 63253 81
- Kupka T (2018) Comparison of the environmental performance of stand- ard printed circuit board production and embedded component pack- aging at AT&S Leoben, Diploma Thesis TU Wien
- Proske M et al (2016b) Obsolescence of electronics-the example of smartphones. Electronics Goes Green Conference 2016, Berlin, http://publi ca.fraun hofer .de/docum ents/N-46756 7.html
- Skerlos S et al (2003) Economic and environmental characteristics of global cellular telephone remanufacturing. IEEE Interna- tional Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, https :// www.seman ticsc holar .org/paper /Econo mic-and-envir onmen tal- chara cteri stics -of-Skerl os-Morro w/b6d0a 354b6 016e7 f2182 399f3 a50da 5ebef 87e6b Statista (2016) Welche Arten von Schäden hatten Sie bisher schon an Ihren Smartphones? https ://de.stati sta.com/stati stik/daten / studi e/66329 8/umfra ge/umfra ge-zu-schae den-an-smart phone s-in- deuts chlan d/. Accessed 16 July 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rittershaus, P., Aryan, V., Sánchez, D., Renner, M., & Poeppelbuss, J. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70271 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos
Soudachanh, S., & Salhofer, S. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020711 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pamminger, R., Glaser, S., & Wimmer, W.
- Affiliations
- TU Wien (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Pamminger, Rainer
- ORCID
- Pamminger, Rainer
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-482
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W3129135727
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- EU Horizon 2020 (Grant Agreement No 680604)
- TU Wien
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Keywords
- circular economy, smartphones, repair, refurbishment, economic allocation, global warming potential, abiotic depletion potential, product life cycle, electronic waste collection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review