CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Educational Strategies and EpistemologiesScience Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information

Mason, Lucia, Boldrin, Angela, Ariasi, Nicola·2010·Metacognition and Learning
DOI 10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1995). Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola media inferiore (New MT tests of reading comprehension for the middle school). Florence: Organizzazioni Speciali.
  2. Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Zamperlin, C., & Meneghetti, C. (2005). AMOS 8-15. Abilità e motivazione allo studio: Prove di valutazione per ragazzi dagli 8 ai 15 anni (AMOS 8-15: Ability and motivation to study: Evaluation scales for students aged 8–15). Trento: Erickson.
  3. King, P. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–139 of 139

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Metacognition and Learning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
67-90
ISSN
  • 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1631
DOI
10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2
OpenAlex
W2065204878
Cited by
139
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
online information searching, evaluating online information, epistemological beliefs, prior knowledge, study approaches, online learning, dinosaur extinction, scientific controversy, justification of knowledge, source evaluation, eighth grade students, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review