The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This finding suggests that while ChatGPT assistance was not disproportionately misleading, users' ability to critically evaluate information remains crucial for minimising errors (Mason et al., 2010).”
From “ ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.” Epistemic beliefs and metacognitive accuracy in students' integration of ChatGPT content into academic writing (2025) · cites this paper as Mason et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years; A Scheme
Perry, W. G. (1970) · Cited by 4,179
(1991) · Cited by 3,259
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research
Smart, J. C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5666-6 · Cited by 2,368
Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.
Schommer, M. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498 · Cited by 2,321
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. T., & Graesser, A. C. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602350 · Cited by 2,138
Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide
Michelene, T. H. (1997) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1 · Cited by 1,765
Personal epistemology the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
Hofer, B. K. (2009) · Cited by 1,652
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1995). Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola media inferiore (New MT tests of reading comprehension for the middle school). Florence: Organizzazioni Speciali.
- Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Zamperlin, C., & Meneghetti, C. (2005). AMOS 8-15. Abilità e motivazione allo studio: Prove di valutazione per ragazzi dagli 8 ai 15 anni (AMOS 8-15: Ability and motivation to study: Evaluation scales for students aged 8–15). Trento: Erickson.
- King, P. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2013.847261 · Cited by 436
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647 · Cited by 346
Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R. H., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Vogl, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003 · Cited by 324
Epistemic Thinking in Action: Evaluating and Integrating Online Sources
Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495 · Cited by 267
Comprehension of Multiple Documents With Conflicting Information: A Two-Step Model of Validation
Richter, T., & Abendroth, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Venue
- Metacognition and Learning
- Published
- 2009-07-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-90
- ISSN
- 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-1631
- OpenAlex
- W2065204878
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- online information searching, evaluating online information, epistemological beliefs, prior knowledge, study approaches, online learning, dinosaur extinction, scientific controversy, justification of knowledge, source evaluation, eighth grade students, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
