The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationInquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394 · cited 3×
“…(see e.g., Friedler et al. 1990; Kuhn et al. 2000; Njoo and de Jong 1993; Quintana et al. 2004) that differ in level of detail but basically present the same series of phases that are often used to organize students’ learning process (see e.g., White and Frederiksen 1998; Sharples et al. 2014).”
BackgroundDoes discovery-based instruction enhance learning?
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021017 · Cited by 1,338 · cited 2×
“Research on computer supported inquiry learning (CoSIL) has shown that computer learning environments, if appropriately designed, can augment inquiry through a number of affordances that ultimately result in offering learners more agency in their learning process (Alfieri et al. 2011; van Joolingen and Zacharia 2009;…”
BackgroundSelf-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
(2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410601032 · Cited by 1,325
Dual space search during scientific reasoning
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1 · Cited by 1,058
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312457206 · Cited by 1,021
Veermans, K., Joolingen, W. V., & de Jong, T. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500277615 · Cited by 96
The practice of inquiry: a pedagogical ‘sweet spot’ for digital literacy?
Bruce, B. C., & Casey, L. (2012) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2012.657994 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4 · Cited by 325
Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2018) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9719-8 · Cited by 59
Sung, S. H., Li, C., Huang, X., & Xie, C. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12600 · Cited by 35
Soysal, Y. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00266-3 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., & Tsourlidaki, E.
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 2015-02-26
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-302
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2024679167
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 67.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0
- The paper
- Zacharia, Z. C., Manoli, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9370-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
