The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 2×
“These findings might suggest that peer reviewers have a preference for findings with positive effects from the interventions under investigation, and makes us reflect on the “file drawer problem” (Rosenthal 1979), which results from not publishing statistically non-significant findings.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- *Rachels, J. R. (2016). The Effect of Gamification on Elementary Students’ Spanish Language Achievement and Academic Self-efficacy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1246/
- *Terrell, J. E. (2016). Instructional Methods and Engagement: The Impact of Gamification on Student Learning of APA Style (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1502
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.-I. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11010022 · Cited by 890
Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education
Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042247 · Cited by 512
“[30] carried out a meta-analysis study where they integrated 30 independent studies in formal educational settings, and it was observed that the effect size on learning outcomes was greater in the gamified groups than in the control groups.”
BackgroundVirtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review
Λαμπρόπουλος, Γ., & Kinshuk, K. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3 · Cited by 569
Effects of Gamification on Behavioral Change in Education: A Meta-Analysis
Kim, J.-H., & Castelli, D. M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18073550 · Cited by 203
“Consequently, this is viewed as one of the leading researches [16,17] to quantify and qualify gamification effects in educational settings using meta-analysis.”
BackgroundMurillo‐Zamorano, L. R., Sánchez, J. Á. L., Caballero, A. L. G., & Muñoz, C. B. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00249-y · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., Hampton, J., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ritzhaupt, Albert D.
- Venue
- Educational Technology Research and Development
- Published
- 2020-07-20
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1875-1901
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W3042860537
- Semantic Scholar
- d8b3b078faf3153b0130718a2dc0923633269276
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Keywords
- gamification, learning outcomes, badges, leaderboards, effect size, engineering education, mathematics education, undergraduate students, formal education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
