CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 240Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityEducational Technology in LearningDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review

Open access
Fernández-Batanero, José María, Montenegro-Rueda, Marta, Fernández-Cerero, José, García-Martínez, Inmaculada·2022·Educational technology research and development
DOI 10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The commitment to increase the inclusion of students with disabilities has ensured that the concept of Assistive Technology (AT) has become increasingly widespread in education. The main objective of this paper focuses on conducting a systematic review of studies regarding the impact of Assistive Technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities. In order to achieve the above, a review of relevant empirical studies published between 2009 and 2020 in four databases (Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, ERIC and PsycINFO) was carried out. The sample consists of 31 articles that met the inclusion criteria of this review, out of a total of 216 identified. Findings of this study include that the use of Assistive Technologies is successful in increasing the inclusion and accessibility of students with disabilities, although barriers such as teacher education, lack of information or accessibility are found.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Asongu, S. A., Orim, S. M. I., & Nting, R. T. (2019). Inequality, information technology and inclusive education in sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 380–389 · DOI
  2. Byrd, A., & León, R. (2017). Assistive Technologies: Learning resources to promote the inclusion and communication of students with disabilities. Nuevos Escenarios de la Comunicación, 2(1), 167–178
  3. Cook, A., & Hessey, S. (1995). Assitive technologies: principles and practice. San Louis, Missouri: Mosby-Yearbook, Inc.
  4. Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., & Scapin, R. (2014). Digital technology, learning, and postsecondary students with disabilities: where we’ve been and where we’re going. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27, 369–379
  5. Fortes Alves, M. D., & Pereira, G. V. (2017). Assistive technology in the perspective of inclusive education: the cyberspace as a locus of autonomy and authoship. LaPlage em Revista, 3(2), 159–169
  6. Laloma, M. (2005). Ayudas técnicas y discapacidad. Madrid: Comité Español de Representantes de Personas con Discapacidad
  7. Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special Eduction technology: clasroom applications. Broods/Cole: Pacific Grove
  8. McNicholl, A., Desmond, D., Casey, H., & Gallagher, P. (2020). The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 16(2), 1–14 · DOI
  9. Paula, I. (2003). Educación Especial. Técnicas de Intervención. Madrid: Mc Graw-Hill
  10. Sivakova, V. (2020). Cloud technologies as assistive technologies in the education of students with special educational needs. Pedagogika, 92(1), 122–133
  11. Yankova, Z. (2019). Additional Support to Children and Students with Special Educational Needs For Learning with Assistive Technologies. Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 91(5), 702–710

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 240

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I.
Venue
Educational technology research and development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-06-10
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1911-1930
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
DOI
10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7
OpenAlex
W4282043263
Cited by
240
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 2
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (State R & D & I Programs aimed at the Challenges of Society (PID2019-108230RB-I00) and the State Research Agency (AEI )) (Project reference / AEI / 10.13039 / 501100011033). Project title "Training of University teachers in ICT as support for students with disabilities")
  • Universidad de Sevilla
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
assistive technology, inclusive education, students with disabilities, accessibility, teacher professional development, barriers to inclusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review