Cited by 160Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Education and EmploymentCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion

Teachers of Students With Learning Disabilities: Assistive Technology Knowledge, Perceptions, Interests, and Barriers

Atanga, Comfort, Jones, Beth A., Krueger, Lacy E., Lu, Shulan·2020·Journal of Special Education Technology

Abstract

Assistive technology (AT) helps bridge the gap between students with learning disabilities (LD) and their peers without LD. However, this implies a need for teachers to become well-trained and proficient in the use of AT. There are established AT competencies for educators, and AT services professionals must be knowledgeable about AT to select and recommend specific technology to individual education program teams. Professionals should also be well-versed with AT to be able to train students in its use. There is a significant need for research on teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of AT (i.e., interest in using it and barriers to incorporating it) as well as the best ways to provide AT training. To investigate these areas, a survey was administered to teachers of students with LD at the elementary and middle school levels. Our results indicated that completing an AT course in college along with self-reported AT proficiency in iPad reading apps were associated with higher ratings of AT knowledge. Additionally, higher AT proficiency ratings and completing AT college course work were associated with perceptions of college preparation of AT, but these factors did not predict perceptions of workplace preparation. Teachers were clearly interested in utilizing AT but felt their college did not adequately prepare them in AT, and funding issues were the most common barriers to implementing AT. Our findings suggest a need for an emphasis on AT training in college courses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0162643419864858

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atanga, C., Jones, B. A., Krueger, L. E., & Lu, S.
Affiliations
East Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Beth A.
Venue
Journal of Special Education Technology
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
236-248
ISSN
  • 0162-6434 (ISSN-L)
  • 2381-3121
OpenAlex
W2965458991
Cited by
160
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
FWCI
21.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Special Education Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Keywords
assistive technology, learning disabilities, teacher knowledge, teacher perceptions, assistive technology training, college preparation, workplace preparation, funding barriers, elementary and middle school teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review