Cited by 23Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Client engagement characteristics associated with problem gambling treatment outcomes

Dowling, Nicki A., Cosic, Sanja·2011·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-010-9298-x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been few studies exploring the influence of treatment and therapist characteristics in treatment outcome studies in the gambling field.

    “There have, however, been few studies exploring the influence of these characteristics in treatment outcome studies in the gambling field (Crisp, Thomas, Jackson, & Thomason, 2001;Dowling & Cosic, 2011;Ladouceur et al., 2006).”
  • Dowling and Cosic (2011) examined the relationship between therapist qualities, including years of counselling experience, years of problem gambling experience, therapist age and therapist gender.

    “To date, Dowling and Cosic (2011) have examined the relationship between therapist qualities, including years of counselling experience, years of problem gambling experience, therapist age and therapist gender.”
  • Dowling and Cosic (2011) noted that the therapist's years of problem gambling counselling experience was associated with positive treatment outcomes.

    “This study noted that the therapist's years of problem gambling counselling experience was associated with positive treatment outcomes.”
  • A limited number of studies, not eligible for inclusion in this review due to timing or type of outcomes assessed, have examined the role of the therapeutic relationship and found that client-rated therapeutic alliance was predictive of gambling outcomes, but therapist-rated therapeutic alliance was not.

    “A limited number of studies, not eligible for inclusion in this review due to timing or type of outcomes assessed, however, have examined the role of the therapeutic relationship and found that client-rated therapeutic alliance was predictive of gambling outcomes (Dowling & Cosic, 2011;Smith, Thomas, & Jackson, 2004), but therapist-rated therapeutic alliance was not (Dowling & Cosic, 2011).”
  • Research on therapist qualities has received little attention in the gambling field, despite promising results in the substance use literature.

    “Additionally, research on therapist qualities has received little attention in the gambling field (Dowling & Cosic, 2011), despite promising results in the substance use literature (Najavits, Crits-Christoph, & Dierberger, 2000;Vuoristo-Myllys, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dowling, N. A., & Cosic, S.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Dowling, Nicki A.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2010-11-16
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
656-671
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W1989791562
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
problem gambling, treatment outcomes, customer engagement, therapeutic relationship, customer commitment, client satisfaction, number of sessions, psychological intervention, general functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review