Cited by 26Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Client characteristics associated with treatment attrition and outcome in female pathological gambling

Dowling, Nicki·2009·Addiction Research & Theory

Abstract

The current study was an exploratory investigation of client factors associated with treatment attrition and failure 6 months following treatment by female pathological gamblers. The sample comprised 77 females attending a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for pathological gambling. Participants were compared on selected client factors that have been traditionally associated with attrition and outcome in the alcohol and substance dependence literature. The results indicate that although treatment dropouts and completers did not differ on any client factor, participants displaying uncontrolled treatment outcomes reported significantly more severe gambling behaviour than participants achieving abstinent or controlled treatment outcomes. Clinicians can respond to these indicators of higher risk of treatment failure by increasing the emphasis of relapse prevention approaches in pathological gambling interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16066350802346193

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are several studies that examine the influence of post-treatment client characteristics on follow-up treatment outcomes.

    “there are several studies that examine the influence of post-treatment client characteristics on follow-up treatment outcomes (Dowling, 2009;Petry & Weiss, 2009;Sander & Peters, 2009).”
  • Each of these studies found promising results consistent with the substance abuse literature, with post-treatment gambling frequency, post-treatment social support and post-treatment psychological distress and quality of life significantly associated with treatment outcomes at follow-up evaluations.

    “Each of these studies found promising results consistent with the substance abuse literature, with post-treatment gambling frequency (Dowling, 2009), post-treatment social support (Petry & Weiss, 2009) and post-treatment psychological distress and quality of life (Sander & Peters, 2009) significantly associated with treatment outcomes at follow-up evaluations.”
  • The severity of gambling behaviour is one of the strongest predictors of outcome in treatment.

    “These findings are consistent with a growing body of evidence that the severity of the gambling behaviour is one of the strongest predictors of outcome in the treatment (Dowling, 2009;Merkouris, Thomas, Browning, & Dowling, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dowling, N.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Dowling, Nicki
Venue
Addiction Research & Theory
Published
2009-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
205-219
ISSN
  • 1058-6989 (ISSN-L)
  • 1606-6359
  • 1476-7392
OpenAlex
W1979729541
Cited by
26
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Addiction Research & Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
gambling addiction, female gamblers, treatment discontinuation, cognitive behavioral therapy, gambling severity, relapse prevention, treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review