Cited by 23Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

An electrooptical muscle contraction sensor

Open access
Chianura, Alessio, Giardini, Mario E.·2010·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

An electrooptical sensor for the detection of muscle contraction is described. Infrared light is injected into the muscle, the backscattering is observed, and the contraction is detected by measuring the change, that occurs during muscle contraction, between the light scattered in the direction parallel and perpendicular to the muscle cells. With respect to electromyography and to optical absorption-based sensors, our device has the advantage of lower invasiveness, of lower sensitivity to electromagnetic noise and to movement artifacts, and of being able to distinguish between isometric and isotonic contractions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11517-010-0626-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This anisotropy can be detected using a surface light source and detectors placed longitudinally and perpendicular to the muscle fiber, representing a modification of the PPG sensor.

    “This anisotropy can be detected utilizing a surface light source and detectors placed longitudinally and perpendicular to the muscle fiber, which represents only a certain modification of the PPG sensor [126,127].”

    From The Current State of Optical Sensors in Medical Wearables (2022) · cites this paper as [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chianura, A., & Giardini, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Giardini, Mario E.
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2010-05-21
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
731-734
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2089826613
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
muscle contraction detection, muscle fiber orientation, isometric contraction, isotonic contraction, electromyography comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Electronics, Medical, Equipment Design, Humans, Infrared Rays, Male, Muscle Contraction, Scattering, Radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review