CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 220Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology in LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework

Castellanos-Reyes, Daniela·2020·TechTrends
DOI 10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CoI model has been mainly applied and discussed in American and Canadian contexts.

    “A paper (Castellanos-Reyes, 2020) on the 20 years' history of the CoI, emphasized that the model has been mainly applied and discussed in American and Canadian contexts.”

    From Collaborative Online Learning across Cultures: the Role of Teaching and Social Presence (2022) · cites this paper as Castellanos-Reyes, 2020

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 12(3), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3.66. · DOI
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7. · DOI
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Journal of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
  4. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bage, L. (2018). Satisfaction with online learning options in the insurance industry: Does mindfulness play a role [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
  6. Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 269–292. · DOI
  7. Díaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.004. · DOI
  8. Duncan, H., & Barnett, J. (2009). Learning to teach online: What works for pre-service teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.3.f. · DOI
  9. Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(1). · DOI
  10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003. · DOI
  12. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002. · DOI
  14. Garrison, D. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263 · DOI
  15. Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2015). Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: A correlational-predictive study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 349–362. · DOI
  16. Harrell, K. B., & Wendt, J. L. (2019). The impact of blended learning on community of inquiry and perceived learning among high school learners enrolled in a public charter school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1590167. · DOI
  17. Jan, S., Vlachopoulos, P., & Parsell, M. (2019). Social network analysis and online learning in communities in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 23(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1398. · DOI
  18. Kozan, K., & Caskurlu, S. (2018). On the nth presence for the Community of Inquiry framework. Computers and Education, 122(March), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.010. · DOI
  19. Lam, J. Y. C. (2015). Autonomy presence in the extended community of inquiry. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 8(1), 39–61.
  20. Lin, S., Hung, T. C., & Lee, C. T. (2015). Revalidate forms of presence in training effectiveness: Mediating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 32–54. · DOI
  21. Oriogun, P. K. (2009). Detecting aspects of critical thinking by cleaning online message transcript through code-recode. The American Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802661694. · DOI
  22. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
  23. Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 23(1), 19–48.
  24. Richardson, J. C., Arbaugh, B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K., & Garrison, R. (2012). Using the Community of Iquiry framework to inform effective instructional design. In L. Moller & J. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education (pp. 97–125). Springer. · DOI
  25. Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., et al. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002. · DOI
  27. Sorensen, C., & Baylen, D. M. (2009). Learning online: Adapting the seven principles of good practice to a web-based instructional environment. In A. Orellana, T. L. Hudgins, & M. Simonson (Eds.), The perfect online course: Best practices for designing and teaching (pp. 69–86). Information Age Publishing.
  28. Stenbom, S., Hrastinski, S., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2012). Student-student online coaching as a relationship of inquiry: An exploratory study from the coach perspective. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(5), 37–48.
  29. Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue [special section]. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.003. · DOI
  30. Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 24(2), 1–12.
  31. Tirado-Morueta, R., Maraver-López, P., Hernando-Gómez, Á., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.00. · DOI
  32. York, C. S., & Richardson, J. C. (2012). Interpersonal interaction in online learning: Experienced online instructors’ perceptions of influencing factors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(4), 83–98.
  33. Zehra, A., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123–136.
  34. Zydney, J. M., Denoyelles, A., & Kyeong-Ju Seo, K. (2012). Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Computers and Education, 58(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Castellanos-Reyes, D.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Castellanos-Reyes, Daniela
ORCID
Castellanos-Reyes, Daniela
Venue
TechTrends
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-03-24
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
557-560
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
DOI
10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
OpenAlex
W3013762540
Cited by
220
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 3
FWCI
46.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
TechTrends (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
Community of Inquiry framework, online higher education, cooperative learning, constructivism, online learning experience, online teaching and learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review