The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education, Part One: the Dynamic Frontier
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The majority of existing work consists of conceptual and opinion-based discussions (e.g., Farrelly & Baker, 2023;Hsu & Ching., 2023;Sohail et al., 2023;Yu, 2023), along with quantitative surveys aimed at specific groups (e.g., Hammour et al., 2023;Tangadulrat et al., 2023).”
From Widen the debate: What is the academic community’s perception on ChatGPT? (2024) · cites this paper as Hsu & Ching., 2023
Citations
Cites
BAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126 · cited 4×
“Maximizing the benefits while being cautious of its potential limitations is essential (Sallam, 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialBaidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463 · cited 3×
“…questions, support students to conduct individual/collaborative learning and research with human peers (Cooper, 2023; Ye et al., 2023) or with the chatbot (e.g., Pavlik, 2023), or help plan for creative problem solving through generating ideas/concepts for facilitating discussions (Ray, 2023).”
BackgroundChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882231162868 · Cited by 1,371 · cited 2×
“With the natural language capability and 24/7 availability, tools such as ChatGPT can provide convenient assistance to educators whenever it is needed in efficient and effective ways (Kohnke et al., 2023).”
BackgroundExamining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Cooper, G. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y · Cited by 1,263 · cited 1×
“…be simply assigned as a chatbot to answer questions, support students to conduct individual/collaborative learning and research with human peers (Cooper, 2023; Ye et al., 2023) or with the chatbot (e.g., Pavlik, 2023), or help plan for creative problem solving through generating ideas/concepts…”
BackgroundChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095783 · Cited by 1,080 · cited 1×
“…and smooth performance while interacting with users, people of all pro-fessions have leveraged this software tool for various tasks and purposes involving text generation, such as composing simple to relative complex textual codes of computer programming (professional) (Rahman & Watanobe, 2023).”
MethodPavlik, J. V. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/10776958221149577 · Cited by 972 · cited 1×
“…questions, support students to conduct individual/collaborative learning and research with human peers (Cooper, 2023; Ye et al., 2023) or with the chatbot (e.g., Pavlik, 2023), or help plan for creative problem solving through generating ideas/concepts for facilitating discussions (Ray, 2023).”
BackgroundInteracting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841
Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning
Mhlanga, D. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4354422 · Cited by 719 · cited 1×
“This can result in biased and unbalanced perspectives reflected in the responses generated by the AI applications based on user queries (Mhlanga, 2023).”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–118 of 118
Incorporating unplugged computational thinking teaching into preschool theme-based curriculum
Chen, Y., Li, Y.-T., & Huang, H.-P. (2026) · Computers and Children · doi:10.29333/cac/17845
Generative AI Literacy for Learning: A Dual Perspective on Learning About and With GenAI
Gümüş, M. M., & Kara, M. (2026) · Beijing international review of education · doi:10.1177/25902547261421651
Demir, B., & Kaya, S. N. (2026) · Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17556/erziefd.1810839
Weerasinghe, B. A. I. R., & Rajakarunanayake, S. (2026) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc68737.2026.11453628
Sithole, M. (2026) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13388-5_7
Olomi, N., Salema, V., & Muteti, C. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9356259/v1
Rajakarunanayake, S., & Weerasinghe, B. A. I. R. (2026) · International Research Conference on Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE) · doi:10.1109/scse70081.2026.11499873
Sampah, S. N. A., Essel, H. B., Agyem, J. A., & Atombo, C. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395261452533
Designing Inclusive P2P Curricula
Kha, N. V. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1732-8.ch005
Uyar, A. (2026) · Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age · doi:10.53850/joltida.1825745
Cuarto, P. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10300970/v1
Ağmaz, R. F., Ergüleç, F., & Küçükaydın, M. A. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-03050-z
Teaching, Research and Application of AI at Belgrade Metropolitan University
Domazet, D., & Jović, J. (2026) · Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems · doi:10.7906/indecs.24.6.7 · Cited by 1
Understanding EFL Teachers' Readiness for Generative AI Integration: A GenAI-TPACK Perspective
Jiang, R., An, X., Li, Y., & Edusei‐Mensah, W. (2026) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649823
Annamalai, N., Nasor, M., Eak, A. D., & Alkubaisy, A. A. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1875727 · Cited by 2
Nair, G., Zhu, Y., Ornelas, I. O. E., Irwanto, M., Murugappan, M., & Ong, S. (2026) · UK-China Teaching, Learning, and Educational Technology (TILE-TEC) · doi:10.1109/tile-tec70450.2026.11682136
The impact of artificial intelligence on students’ metacognition: a systematic review
Ji, C., & Tan, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1947198
Lang, W., & Qi, S. (2026) · Researching and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language · doi:10.3138/rtcfl-2026-0006
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hsu, Yu-Chang
- Venue
- TechTrends
- Published
- 2023-06-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-607
- ISSN
- 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-3894
- OpenAlex
- W4379651111
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 27.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- TechTrends (publishedVersion)
- Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- generative AI, ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in education, educational technology, future of education, AI ethics, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
