Cited by 232Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education

Cain, William·2024·TechTrends

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cain sets out how training in prompting helps students and educators transition from passive recipients to active co-creators of their learning experiences.

    “Cain [70] sets out how training in prompting helps students and educators transition from passive recipients to active co-creators of their learning experiences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cain, W.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Cain, William
Venue
TechTrends
Published
2023-10-18
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
47-57
ISSN
  • 1559-7075 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-3894
OpenAlex
W4387736592
Cited by
232
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 1
FWCI
54.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TechTrends (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
prompt engineering, large language models, artificial intelligence in education, critical thinking, information literacy, media literacy, digital citizenship, personalized learning, educational equity, AI ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review