The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG
Open accessAbstract
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is an approach first introduced for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to quantify effective connectivity between brain areas. Recently, this framework has been extended and established in the magneto/encephalography (M/EEG) domain. DCM for M/EEG entails the inversion a full spatiotemporal model of evoked responses, over multiple conditions. This model rests on a biophysical and neurobiological generative model for electrophysiological data. A generative model is a prescription of how data are generated. The inversion of a DCM provides conditional densities on the model parameters and, indeed on the model itself. These densities enable one to answer key questions about the underlying system. A DCM comprises two parts; one part describes the dynamics within and among neuronal sources, and the second describes how source dynamics generate data in the sensors, using the lead-field. The parameters of this spatiotemporal model are estimated using a single (iterative) Bayesian procedure. In this paper, we will motivate and describe the current DCM framework. Two examples show how the approach can be applied to M/EEG experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Dynamic causal modeling (DCM), leveraging EEG’s temporal precision, enables exploration of these mechanisms21–23.”
From Deviations in effective connectivity explain different hallucination subtypes in Parkinson's disease psychosis (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis
Klimesch, W. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3 · Cited by 6,889
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationPreface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation
Tallon‐Baudry, C. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1 · Cited by 2,205
Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., et al. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720127 · Cited by 2,157
Baillet, S., Mosher, J., & Leahy, R. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,846
Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain
Gross, J., Kujala, J., Hämäläinen, M., Timmermann, L., Schnitzler, A., & Salmelin, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 · Cited by 1,810
(2003) · Cited by 1,680
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 210
Computational neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease
Little, S. J., & Bestmann, S. (2015) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.09.002 · Cited by 12
How Does iReadMore Therapy Change the Reading Network of Patients with Central Alexia?
Kerry, S. J., Mejía, Ó. M. A., Penny, W. D., Crinion, J., Leff, A. P., & Woodhead, Z. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1426-18.2019 · Cited by 12
Probabilistic delay differential equation modeling of event-related potentials
Ostwald, D., & Starke, L. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.025 · Cited by 11
Modeling the role of the thalamus in resting-state functional connectivity: Nature or structure
Cabrera-Álvarez, J., Doorn, N., Maestú, F., & Susi, G. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011007 · Cited by 11
Acharya, G., Davis, K. A., & Nozari, E. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06859-2 · Cited by 10
Statistical Perspective on Functional and Causal Neural Connectomics: A Comparative Study
Biswas, R., & Shlizerman, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2022.817962 · Cited by 11
Singh, M. F., Braver, T. S., Cole, M. W., & Ching, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2409577121 · Cited by 10
Dynamic Causal Modeling and Its Application to Psychiatric Disorders
Heinzle, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809825-7.00005-5 · Cited by 10
Brain model state space reconstruction using an LSTM neural network
Liu, Y., Soto-Breceda, A., Karoly, P. J., Grayden, D. B., Zhao, Y., Cook, M. J., Schmidt, D., & Kuhlmann, L. (2023) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/acd871 · Cited by 10
Young, C. K., Ruan, M., & McNaughton, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2017.00072 · Cited by 8
Daun, S., Mantziaris, C., Toth, T. I., Büschges, A., & Rosjat, N. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220767 · Cited by 10
de Bézenac, C. E., García‐Fiñana, M., Baker, G. A., Moore, P., Leek, N., Mohanraj, R., Bonilha, L., Richardson, M. P., Marson, A. G., & Keller, S. S. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034347 · Cited by 10
Rho, G., Callara, A. L., Cecchetto, C., Vanello, N., Scilingo, E. P., & Greco, A. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3226207 · Cited by 10
Wang, J., Yi, M., Zhang, C., Bian, Z., Wan, Y., Chen, R., & Xiaoli Li, A. (2015) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-015-9349-x · Cited by 9
A recurrent Hopfield network for estimating meso-scale effective connectivity in MEG
Gosti, G., Milanetti, E., Folli, V., de Pasquale, F., Leonetti, M., Corbetta, M., Ruocco, G., & Penna, S. D. (2023) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.11.027 · Cited by 9
Pugh, Z. H., Huang, J., Leshin, J. C., Lindquist, K. A., & Nam, C. S. (2022) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-022-09805-2 · Cited by 13
On the two-step estimation of the cross-power spectrum for dynamical linear inverse problems
Vallarino, E., Sommariva, S., Piana, M., & Sorrentino, A. (2020) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ab67dc · Cited by 9
Neural network dynamics in Parkinson's disease
Lourens, M. A. J. (2013) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036535076 · Cited by 9
Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review
Gopalakrishnan, R., Malan, N. S., Mandava, N., Dunn, E., Nero, N., Burgess, R. C., Mays, M., & Hogue, O. (2024) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.14867 · Cited by 8
Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33045-2_18 · Cited by 10
Multiple-Shooting Adjoint Method for Whole-Brain Dynamic Causal Modeling
Zhuang, J., Dvornek, N. C., Tatikonda, S., Papademetris, X., Ventola, P. E., & Duncan, J. S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_5 · Cited by 8
Madi, M. K., & Karameh, F. N. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181513 · Cited by 8
Shaw, L., & Routray, A. (2018) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2875377 · Cited by 8
Down syndrome’s brain dynamics: analysis of fractality in resting state
Hemmati, S., Ahmadlou, M., Gharib, M., Vameghi, R., & Sajedi, F. (2013) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-013-9248-y · Cited by 10
Developing control-theoretic objectives for large-scale brain dynamics and cognitive enhancement
Singh, M. F., Cole, M. W., Braver, T. S., & Ching, S. (2022) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.05.001 · Cited by 7
Wahbeh, H., Cannard, C., Kriegsman, M., & Arnaud Delorme, A. (2023) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.12.011 · Cited by 7
Low-frequency oscillations in cortical level to help diagnose task-specific dystonia
Chen, C., Macerollo, A., Heng, H.-M., Lu, M., Tsai, C., Daniyal, Wang, W.-J., & Chen, J. (2021) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105444 · Cited by 7
Shaw, A. D., Hughes, L. E., Moran, R., Coyle-Gilchrist, I. T. S., Rittman, T., & Rowe, J. B. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/416388 · Cited by 8
Self-citationGood Scientific Practice in MEEG Research: Progress and PerspectivesPreprint
Niso, G., Krol, L. R., Combrisson, E., Dubarry, A., Elliott, M., Clément, F., Héjja‐Brichard, Y., Herbst, S. K., Jerbi, K., Ković, V., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n2ryp · Cited by 7
Kalogeropoulos, C., Mavroudi, S. P., & Theofilatos, K. (2026) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals7010017 · Cited by 7
Rho, G., Callara, A. L., Bossi, F., Ognibene, D., Cecchetto, C., Lomonaco, T., Scilingo, E. P., & Greco, A. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad2403 · Cited by 6
Larsen, K. M., Madsen, K. S., van Themaat, A. H. V. L., Thorup, A. A. E., Plessen, K. J., Mors, O. N., Nordentoft, M., & Siebner, H. R. (2023) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbad092 · Cited by 5
Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00087-5_18 · Cited by 6
Hettiarachchi, I. T., Mohamed, S. M. K., Nyhof, L., & Nahavandi, S. (2013) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2013.6610408 · Cited by 5
Connectivity analysis of novelty process in habitual short sleepers
Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., Gumenyuk, V., Roth, T. G., Drake, C. L., & Hamid Soltanian-zadeh, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.011 · Cited by 5
Kang, J., Jung, K., Eo, J., Son, J., & Park, H. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116755 · Cited by 5
Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses during emergency braking: an ERP study
Sabahi, Y., Setarehdan, S. K., & Nasrabadi, A. M. (2021) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-021-09716-8 · Cited by 5
Odor valence modulates cortico-cortical interactions: a preliminary study using DCM for EEG
Rho, G., Callara, A. L., Vanello, N., Gentili, C., Greco, A., & Scilingo, E. P. (2021) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc46164.2021.9629910 · Cited by 5
Model-Based Approaches to Investigating Mismatch Responses in Schizophrenia
Gütlin, D., McDermott, H. H., Grundei, M., & Auksztulewicz, R. (2024) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/15500594241253910 · Cited by 5
Synaptic inhibitory dynamics drive benzodiazepine response in pediatric status epilepticus
Fedele, T., Burman, R. J., Steinberg, A., Selmin, G., Ramantani, G., & Rosch, R. E. (2025) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.18398 · Cited by 5
Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., & Hamid Soltanian-zadeh, A. (2010) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2010.10.009 · Cited by 4
Interictal discharges spread along local recurrent networks between tubers and surrounding cortex
Tumpa, S., Thornton, R., Tisdall, M. M., Baldeweg, T., Friston, K. J., & Rosch, R. E. (2025) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp288141 · Cited by 4
Self-citationOgawa, Y., Yamaguchi, I., Kotani, K., & Jimbo, Y. (2017) · IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1002/tee.22481 · Cited by 4
Dynamic causal modeling for EEG during complex laparoscopic skill acquisitionPreprint
Walia, P., Kamat, A., De, S., & Dutta, A. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-812075/v1 · Cited by 4
A variational approach to scriptsPreprint
Albarracin, M., Constant, A., Friston, K. J., & Ramstead, M. J. D. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/67zy4 · Cited by 5
Self-citationResting-State f MRI Advances for Functional Brain Dynamics
Larrivee, D. C. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.113802 · Cited by 3
Modelling cortical network dynamics
Cooray, G. K., Rosch, R. E., & Friston, K. J. (2024) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-024-05624-8 · Cited by 6
Self-citationBandara, K. H., Rowe, E., & Garrido, M. I. (2025) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niaf033 · Cited by 3
Self-citationTriangulating the Reading Brain: Eye Movements, Computational Models, and EEG
Reilly, R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02868-2_9 · Cited by 3
Neural Field Models: historical perspectives and recent advancesPreprint
Cook, B. J., Peterson, A. D. H., Woldman, W., & Terry, J. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
A variational approach to scriptsPreprint
Albarracin, M., Constant, A., Friston, K. J., & Ramstead, M. J. D. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/x45ha · Cited by 7
Self-citationSynaptic inhibitory dynamics drive benzodiazepine response in paediatric status epilepticusPreprint
Fedele, T., Burman, R. J., Steinberg, A., Selmin, G., Ramantani, G., & Rosch, R. E. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.23.23294456 · Cited by 3
Singh, M. F., Braver, T. S., Cole, M. W., & Ching, S. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.14.567088 · Cited by 3
An Introduction to EEG/MEG for Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience
van Wijk, B. C. M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45271-0_8 · Cited by 3
A fast dynamic causal modeling regression method for fMRI
Wu, H., Hu, X., & Zeng, Y. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120954 · Cited by 2
A canonical microcircuit for estimating Excitation/Inhibition (E/I) balance
Hauke, D. J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, J., Oloye, H., Berndt, L. C. S., Pinotsis, D. A., Friston, K. J., Mathalon, D. H., & Adams, R. A. (2026) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04312-y · Cited by 2
Self-citationVeeramalla, S. K., & Rao, T. V. K. H. (2020) · Journal of Circuits Systems and Computers · doi:10.1142/s0218126621501498 · Cited by 2
Extensions of Multivariate Dynamical Systems to Simultaneously Explain Neural and Behavioral Data
Liu, Q., Petrov, A. A., Lu, Z., & Turner, B. M. (2020) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-020-00072-0 · Cited by 2
MCMC for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification from Time-Series Data
Maybank, P., Peltzer, P., Naumann, U., & Bojak, I. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50436-6_52 · Cited by 2
Wegner, K., Wilson, C. R. E., Procyk, E., Friston, K. J., de Steen, F. V., Pinotsis, D. A., & Marinazzo, D. (2023) · Neurons Behavior Data analysis and Theory · doi:10.51628/001c.68433 · Cited by 1
Self-citationPaci, E., Lumb, B. M., Apps, R., Lawrenson, C. L., & Moran, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2023.1148604 · Cited by 1
Self-citationNew Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Larrivee, D. C. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.111259 · Cited by 2
Kang, J., & Park, H. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012655 · Cited by 2
Alterations in EEG functional connectivity in preterm infants: A systematic review
Li, J., Jiang, C., Xu, X., & Cheng, G. (2025) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2025.106387 · Cited by 1
Bansal, S., Peterson, B. S., Gupte, C., Sawardekar, S., Anaya, M. J. G., Ordonez, M., Bhojwani, D., Santoro, J. D., & Bansal, R. (2025) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111541 · Cited by 1
Directed causal networks for leading and following in hyperscanning EEG
Silfwerbrand, L., Koike, Y., & Gingnell, M. (2025) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2025.2573910 · Cited by 1
Stoof, U., Friston, K. J., Tisdall, M. M., Cooray, G., & Rosch, R. E. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70393 · Cited by 2
Self-citationThe recurrent Hopfield mass model: Scalability and optimization
Ferrazza, M., Gosti, G., Milanetti, E., Spadone, S., Ruocco, G., & Penna, S. D. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108406 · Cited by 1
Harenbrock, J., Schloßmacher, I., Todd, J., & Straube, T. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106534 · Cited by 5
Dynamic causal modeling of low-density resting-state EEG in long-term meditation practitioners
Rho, G., Bossi, F., Norbu, N., Kechok, J., Sherab, N., Soepa, J., Thakchoe, J., Greco, A., Scilingo, E. P., Vanello, N., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-41310-y · Cited by 1
Dynamic Causal Modelling for magneto- and electroencephalography
Kiebel, S. J. (2012) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2012-4173 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBaillet, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0723-2_6 · Cited by 1
State space models and their spectral decomposition in dynamic causal modeling
Moran, R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.006 · Cited by 1
Self-citationHari, R., & Puce, A. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780190497774.003.0009 · Cited by 1
Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_18-1 · Cited by 1
Cheung, V. K. M., & Sakamoto, S. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0594-22.2022 · Cited by 1
What We Have Learned about Memory from Neuroimaging
Greve, A., & Henson, R. N. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118332634.ch1 · Cited by 1
Inverse Problems in Neural Population Models
Potthast, R. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_64-1 · Cited by 1
Oestreich, L., Randeniya, R., & Garrido, M. I. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/365072 · Cited by 1
Self-citationEarly processing of consonance and dissonance in human auditory cortexPreprint
Tabas, A., Andermann, M., Sebold, V., Riedel, H., Balaguer‐Ballester, E., & Rupp, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.10991 · Cited by 1
Diminishing Arousal Shifts the Balance of Cortical Networks Supporting Spatial AttentionPreprint
Niedernhuber, M., Carmel, D. P., Bekinschtein, T. A., & Bareham, C. A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.08.692359 · Cited by 1
Vignando, M., Ffytche, D., Mazibuko, N., Palma, G., Bhat, A., Montagnese, M., Dave, S., Tai, Y. F., Batzu, L., Leta, V., et al. (2026) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-026-00669-7
“Nevertheless, we interpret this cautiously, as interhemi-spheric connections may be difficult to identify robustly in source-level EEG 36 , with the possibility of increasing model complexity without necessarily improving model evidence 21,22 .”
Prediction error dependent changes in brain connectivity during associative learning
den Ouden, H. E. M. (2009) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Hybrid Active InferencePreprint
Ofner, A., & Stober, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.02647
Neuroergonomics Behind Culture: A Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) Study on Emotion
Pugh, Z. H., Huang, J., Lindquist, K. A., & Nam, C. S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_17
Jefsen, O. H., Dietz, M. J., Friston, K. J., Mors, O. N., & Юрьевич, Ш. Ю. (2021) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.10.549
Self-citationZhao, Y., Boley, M., Pelentritou, A., Karoly, P. J., Freestone, D. R., Liu, Y., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., William, W., Liley, D. T. J., & Kuhlmann, L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.03.490402
Inverse Problems in Neural Population Models
Potthast, R. (2015) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6675-8_64
XueQing, J. I., LanXiang, L. I. U., Dong, C. U. I., & Xiaoli Li, A. (2011) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/zf2011-41-8-978
Inverse Problems in Neural Population Models
Potthast, R. (2022) · Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1006-0_64
Neural activity in human eyeblink conditioning: an optically pumped magnetometer-based MEG studyPreprint
Lin, C., Tierney, T. M., Mellor, S., O’Neill, G. C., Bestmann, S., Barnes, G. R., & Miall, R. C. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.19.510727
Control-theoretic integration of stimulation and electrophysiology for cognitive enhancement
Singh, M. F., Cole, M. W., Braver, T. S., & Ching, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroimaging · doi:10.3389/fnimg.2022.982288
Working Memory Load Impact on Effective Connectivity: a Dynamic Causal Modeling Study
Huang, J., Nam, C. S., & Fitts, E. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661139
Ihalainen, R., Annen, J., Gosseries, O., Cardone, P., Panda, R., Martial, C., Thibaut, A., Laureys, S., & Chennu, S. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.07.544105
Hari, R., & Puce, A. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780197542187.003.0010
Data-driven neural mass modelling
Sofia, L. (2019) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-131745
Jin, H., Abdelnour, F., Verma, P., Sipes, B. S., Nagarajan, S. S., & Raj, A. (2024) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00307
Parr, T., Pezzulo, G., Moran, R., Ramstead, M. J. D., Constant, A., & Bhat, A. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27090944
Self-citationWilliams, R. S., Naessens, M., Todd, E. G., Durcan, R., Whiteside, D. J., Lanskey, J. H., Jafarian, A., Friston, K. J., Hughes, L. E., & Rowe, J. B. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.10.22.25338552 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFoster, R., Delaney, C., Krusienski, D. J., & Ly, C. (2026) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-025-01566-3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kiebel, Stefan J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neurodynamics
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-136
- ISSN
- 1871-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1871-4099
- PMC
- PMC2427062
- OpenAlex
- W2124995442
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Cognitive Neurodynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130)
- Irish Research Council
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, M/EEG, effective connectivity, generative models, Bayesian parameter estimation, evoked potentials, lead field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review