The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG
Open accessAbstract
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is an approach first introduced for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to quantify effective connectivity between brain areas. Recently, this framework has been extended and established in the magneto/encephalography (M/EEG) domain. DCM for M/EEG entails the inversion a full spatiotemporal model of evoked responses, over multiple conditions. This model rests on a biophysical and neurobiological generative model for electrophysiological data. A generative model is a prescription of how data are generated. The inversion of a DCM provides conditional densities on the model parameters and, indeed on the model itself. These densities enable one to answer key questions about the underlying system. A DCM comprises two parts; one part describes the dynamics within and among neuronal sources, and the second describes how source dynamics generate data in the sensors, using the lead-field. The parameters of this spatiotemporal model are estimated using a single (iterative) Bayesian procedure. In this paper, we will motivate and describe the current DCM framework. Two examples show how the approach can be applied to M/EEG experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Dynamic causal modeling (DCM), leveraging EEG’s temporal precision, enables exploration of these mechanisms21–23.”
From Deviations in effective connectivity explain different hallucination subtypes in Parkinson's disease psychosis (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis
Klimesch, W. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3 · Cited by 6,889
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationPreface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation
Tallon‐Baudry, C. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1 · Cited by 2,205
Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., et al. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720127 · Cited by 2,157
Baillet, S., Mosher, J., & Leahy, R. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,846
Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain
Gross, J., Kujala, J., Hämäläinen, M., Timmermann, L., Schnitzler, A., & Salmelin, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 · Cited by 1,810
(2003) · Cited by 1,680
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–210 of 210
Analysis of Drone-Assisted Building Inspection Training in VR vs. 2D Monitor Display: An EEG Study
Pengkun, L., Greene, J., Huang, J., Tang, P., & Hou, Y. (2026) · ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE) · doi:10.1061/9780784486436.107
Diaconescu, A. O., Wang, Z., & Griffiths, J. D. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.28.702100
Causal Analysis of Graph Signals for Brain Effectome Inference
Mutnuri, S., Adiga, A., Venkatramanan, S., & MARATHE, M. V. (2025) · Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC) · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf67917.2025.11443323
Ojeda, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20450-9_20
Quattrociocchi, I., Caracci, V., Rotondo, E., Colamarino, E., Pichiorri, F., Riccio, A., Febo Cincotti, A., Toppi, J., & Laura Astolfi, A. (2026) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ae7766
High-frequency oscillations and sleep spindles in epilepsy: from mechanisms to modeling
Zhao, K., Wu, M., Zhao, J., Teng, Y., Sun, Z. X., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1779207
Wang, X., Li, S., Zhang, M., & Yang, C. (2026) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00311-3
Orzan, M., Goga, E., Trifu, D., Diaconescu, M., & Constantinescu, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1883915
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kiebel, Stefan J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neurodynamics
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-136
- ISSN
- 1871-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1871-4099
- PMC
- PMC2427062
- OpenAlex
- W2124995442
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Cognitive Neurodynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130)
- Irish Research Council
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, M/EEG, effective connectivity, generative models, Bayesian parameter estimation, evoked potentials, lead field
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review