Decentralized master production and recycling scheduling of lithium-ion batteries: a techno-economic optimization model
Open accessAbstract
Due to the rapid growth of e-mobility, increasing amounts of lithium-ion batteries are produced and returned after their lifetime. However, these returns will lead to new challenges for manufacturers and recyclers, considering the end-of-life. Especially the increasing interaction between forward and reverse supply chain and the related decision on the end-of-life options (e.g., recycling, remanufacturing, and reuse) need to be planned and executed in a sophisticated way. Therefore, we focus on the interactions between recycler and manufacturer as two of the major actors of each supply chain. We formulate optimization models for the master recycling scheduling and the master production scheduling. To analyze current decentralized decisions of the recycler and remanufacturer, we further formulate an integrated master production and recycling scheduling model. In the following, we describe the production and recycling of lithium-ion batteries in a case study. Here, we examine five different scenarios. We find that for all scenarios, manufacturer and recycler achieve positive contribution margins. However, inefficiencies always occur due to opportunistic behavior. As a result, reuse is performed only in case of centralized planning. Hence, coordination is needed between the forward and reverse supply chain to achieve the maximal contribution margin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Models have been used to manage the materials in the supply chain for efficient production.
“Models have been used to manage the materials in the supply chain for efficient production [80-83].”
From Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries (2024) · cites this paper as [80]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marcos, J. T., Scheller, C., Godina, R., Spengler, T. S., & Carvalho, H. (2021) · Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain · doi:10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100006 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationScheller, C., Schmidt, K., & Spengler, T. S. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108892 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationLithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries
Jones, E. C. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17112685 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scheller, C., Schmidt, K., & Spengler, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Scheller, Christian
- Venue
- Journal of Business Economics
- Published
- 2020-07-11
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-282
- ISSN
- 0044-2372 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-8928
- OpenAlex
- W3040712473
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Business Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- NBank (ZW 6- 85018080)
- European Regional Development Fund (ZW 6- 85018080)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- lithium-ion batteries, battery recycling, end-of-life batteries, master production scheduling, decentralized decision-making, remanufacturing, battery reuse, electric mobility, supply chain coordination, contribution margin, techno-economic optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review