Cited by 23Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementExtraction and Separation Processes

Decentralized master production and recycling scheduling of lithium-ion batteries: a techno-economic optimization model

Open access
Scheller, Christian, Schmidt, Kerstin, Spengler, Thomas Stefan·2021·Journal of Business Economics

Abstract

Due to the rapid growth of e-mobility, increasing amounts of lithium-ion batteries are produced and returned after their lifetime. However, these returns will lead to new challenges for manufacturers and recyclers, considering the end-of-life. Especially the increasing interaction between forward and reverse supply chain and the related decision on the end-of-life options (e.g., recycling, remanufacturing, and reuse) need to be planned and executed in a sophisticated way. Therefore, we focus on the interactions between recycler and manufacturer as two of the major actors of each supply chain. We formulate optimization models for the master recycling scheduling and the master production scheduling. To analyze current decentralized decisions of the recycler and remanufacturer, we further formulate an integrated master production and recycling scheduling model. In the following, we describe the production and recycling of lithium-ion batteries in a case study. Here, we examine five different scenarios. We find that for all scenarios, manufacturer and recycler achieve positive contribution margins. However, inefficiencies always occur due to opportunistic behavior. As a result, reuse is performed only in case of centralized planning. Hence, coordination is needed between the forward and reverse supply chain to achieve the maximal contribution margin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11573-020-00999-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheller, C., Schmidt, K., & Spengler, T. S.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Corresponding author
Scheller, Christian
Venue
Journal of Business Economics
Published
2020-07-11
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
253-282
ISSN
  • 0044-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-8928
OpenAlex
W3040712473
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NBank (ZW 6- 85018080)
  • European Regional Development Fund (ZW 6- 85018080)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, battery recycling, end-of-life batteries, master production scheduling, decentralized decision-making, remanufacturing, battery reuse, electric mobility, supply chain coordination, contribution margin, techno-economic optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review