Cited by 46Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementExtraction and Separation ProcessesSupply Chain and Inventory Management

Effects of network structures on the production planning in closed-loop supply chains—A case study based analysis for lithium-ion batteries in Europe

Scheller, Christian, Schmidt, Kerstin, Spengler, Thomas S.·2023·International Journal of Production Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108892

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Scheller, C., Schmidt, K., & Spengler, T. S.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Corresponding author
Scheller, Christian
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
262
Pages
108892
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4375840521
Cited by
46
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund (ZW 6–85018080)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
closed-loop supply chain, lithium-ion batteries, production planning, network structure, battery recycling, battery repurposing, battery collection, electric vehicles, circular economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review