Cited by 84Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationSocial Media and Politics

A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development

Open access
Chretien, Katherine C., Tuck, Matthew G., Simon, Michael, Singh, Lisa O., Kind, Terry·2015·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background While researchers have studied negative professional consequences of medical trainee social media use, little is known about how medical students informally use social media for education and career development. This knowledge may help future and current physicians succeed in the digital age.Objective We aimed to explore how and why medical students use Twitter for professional development.Design This was a digital ethnography.Participants Medical student "superusers" of Twitter participated in the study Approach The postings ("tweets") of 31 medical student superusers were observed for 8 months (May-December 2013), and structured field notes recorded. Through purposive sampling, individual key informant interviews were conducted to explore Twitter use and values until thematic saturation was reached (ten students). Three faculty key informant interviews were also conducted. Ego network and subnetwork analysis of student key informants was performed. Qualitative analysis included inductive coding of field notes and interviews, triangulation of data, and analytic memos in an iterative process.Key results Twitter served as a professional tool that supplemented the traditional medical school experience. Superusers approached their use of Twitter with purpose and were mindful of online professionalism as well as of being good Twitter citizens. Their tweets reflected a mix of personal and professional content. Student key informants had a high number of followers. The subnetwork of key informants was well-connected, showing evidence of a social network versus information network. Twitter provided value in two major domains: access and voice. Students gained access to information, to experts, to a variety of perspectives including patient and public perspectives, and to communities of support. They also gained a platform for advocacy, control of their digital footprint, and a sense of equalization within the medical hierarchy.Conclusions Twitter can serve as a professional tool that supplements traditional education. Students' practices and guiding principles can serve as best practices for other students as well as faculty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-015-3345-z

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benefits of social media on e-professionalism of health care professionals can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through social media sites.

    “Benefits of SM on e-professionalism of HCPs can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through SM sites [33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 44-46, 53, 69, 72, 76, 78, 79, 92, 97, 106-108, 117].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Background (page unavailable) describes Twitter as useful for professional networking, and ‘Value for Medical Students’ reports opportunities for professional collaboration. The study concerns medical students and describes forming connections, not improvements to established networks across health care professionals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although there exist concerns about misuse of social media and violation of e-professionalism by health care professionals, social media can also be used constructively as a tool for professional development; as a means of accessing information, marketing practices and services, job opportunities; and as a means of sharing or adding opinions on issues of interest to health care professionals and o

    “Although there exist concerns about misuse of SM and violation of e-professionalism by HCPs, SM can also be used constructively as a tool for professional development; as a means of accessing information, marketing practices and services, job opportunities; and as a means of sharing or adding opinions on issues of interest to HCPs and to other like-minded individuals online [44,187].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube were specifically targeted social media/social networking sites in 7 studies.

    “Twitter [38,44,80,91,110], Instagram [101], and YouTube [37] were specifically targeted SM/SNSs in 7 studies.”
  • A total of 11 studies conducted in-depth or semistructured interviews, and 6 studies used focus groups.

    “A total of 11 studies conducted in-depth or semistructured interviews [34,36,44,49,58,65,73,76,97,104,117], and 6 studies used focus groups [45,49,58,70,112,117].”
  • Social media is where medical students gained control of their digital footprint and a sense of equalization within the medical hierarchy.

    “SM is also where they gained control of their digital footprint and a sense of equalization within the medical hierarchy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Medical Association. Opinion 9.124 -Professionalism in the Use of Social Media. AMA Code Med Ethics. 2011. http://www.ama-assn.org/ ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opin- ion9124.page. Accessed March 24, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chretien, K. C., Tuck, M. G., Simon, M., Singh, L. O., & Kind, T.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Children's National (US)
Corresponding author
Chretien, Katherine C.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2015-05-08
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1673-1680
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W222090110
Cited by
84
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Twitter, medical students, social media use, professional development, online professionalism, medical education, digital footprint, advocacy, social networks, information networks, medical hierarchy, career development
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Students, Medical, United States, Qualitative Research, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review