Cited by 27Social Media in Health EducationHealthcare RegulationOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation

Social media and professionalism: a retrospective content analysis of Fitness to Practise cases heard by the GDC concerning social media complaints

Open access
Neville, P.·2017·British Dental Journal

Abstract

Introduction Since 2013, all General Dental Council (GDC) registrants' online activities have been regulated by the GDC's social media guidelines. Failure to comply with these guidelines results in a Fitness to Practise (FtP) complaint being investigated.Aims This study explores the prevalence of social media related FtP cases investigated by the GDC from 1 September 2013 to 21 June 2016.Method Documentary analysis of social media related FtP cases published on the GDC's website was undertaken. All cases that met the study's inclusion criteria were analysed using a quantitative content analysis framework.Findings It was found that 2.4% of FtP cases published on the GDC website during that period were related to breaches of the social media guidelines. All of the cases investigated were proven and upheld. Most of those named in the complaints were dental nurses and the most common type of complaint was inappropriate Facebook comments.Conclusions The low incidence rate should be interpreted with caution, being illustrative of the types of issues that might arise rather than the volume. The GDC will need to remain vigilant in this area and ensure that social media awareness training is an active part of CPD for all the dental team.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.765

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neville, P.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Neville, P.
Venue
British Dental Journal
Published
2017-09
Volume
223
Issue
5
Pages
353-357
ISSN
  • 0007-0610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5373
OpenAlex
W2750626303
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BDJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Keywords
social media, fitness to practise, General Dental Council, social media policy, dental assistants, Facebook comments, professional boundaries, continuing professional development
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Dentistry, Retrospective Studies, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review