The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship Between Professional Burnout and Quality and Safety in Healthcare: A Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Healthcare provider burnout is considered a factor in quality of care, yet little is known about the consistency and magnitude of this relationship. This meta-analysis examined relationships between provider burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment) and the quality (perceived quality, patient satisfaction) and safety of healthcare.Methods Publications were identified through targeted literature searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses through March of 2015. Two coders extracted data to calculate effect sizes and potential moderators. We calculated Pearson's r for all independent relationships between burnout and quality measures, using a random effects model. Data were assessed for potential impact of study rigor, outliers, and publication bias.Results Eighty-two studies including 210,669 healthcare providers were included. Statistically significant negative relationships emerged between burnout and quality (r = -0.26, 95 % CI [-0.29, -0.23]) and safety (r = -0.23, 95 % CI [-0.28, -0.17]). In both cases, the negative relationship implied that greater burnout among healthcare providers was associated with poorer-quality healthcare and reduced safety for patients. Moderators for the quality relationship included dimension of burnout, unit of analysis, and quality data source. Moderators for the relationship between burnout and safety were safety indicator type, population, and country. Rigor of the study was not a significant moderator.Discussion This is the first study to systematically, quantitatively analyze the links between healthcare provider burnout and healthcare quality and safety across disciplines. Provider burnout shows consistent negative relationships with perceived quality (including patient satisfaction), quality indicators, and perceptions of safety. Though the effects are small to medium, the findings highlight the importance of effective burnout interventions for healthcare providers. Moderator analyses suggest contextual factors to consider for future study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment, deteriorates mental health, staff retention [2], and patient safety [3].”
From The Work-life Check-ins randomized controlled trial: a leader-based adaptive, semi-structured burnout intervention in primary care clinics (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Studies show that these issues also impact patient well-being and safety, leading to lower quality of care, reduced patient satisfaction, and higher rates of medical errors (2, 11).”
From Digital resilience interventions for healthcare workers: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513 · Cited by 18,187
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Stalker C, Harvey C. Professional Burnout: A Review of Theory, Research, and Prevention. Wilfrid Laurier University; 2002.
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008.
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2). Englewood: Biostat; 2011.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology
Gardner, R. L., Cooper, E., Haskell, J., Harris, D. A., Poplau, S., Kroth, P. J., & Linzer, M. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy145 · Cited by 566
Dewa, C. S., Loong, D., Bonato, S., & Trojanowski, L. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015141 · Cited by 546
Evidence Relating Health Care Provider Burnout and Quality of Care
Tawfik, D. S., Scheid, A., Profit, J., Shanafelt, T. D., Trockel, M., Adair, K. C., Sexton, J. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m19-1152 · Cited by 592
Johnson, J., Hall, L. H., Berzins, K., Baker, J., Melling, K., & Thompson, C. (2018) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12416 · Cited by 371
Burnout, Drop Out, Suicide: Physician Loss in Emergency Medicine, Part I
Stehman, C. R., Testo, Z., Gershaw, R. S., & Kellogg, A. R. (2019) · Western Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.4.40970 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Salyers, M. P., Bonfils, K. A., Luther, L., Firmin, R. L., White, D. A., Adams, E. L., & Rollins, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salyers, Michelle P.
- Venue
- Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Published
- 2016-10-26
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-482
- ISSN
- 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1497
- PMC
- PMC5377877
- OpenAlex
- W2543998875
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Purdue University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- professional burnout, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, quality of care, patient safety, patient satisfaction, perceived quality of care, healthcare workers, burnout intervention
- MeSH terms
- Burnout, Professional, Clinical Competence, Health Personnel, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
