Cited by 116Race, Genetics, and SocietyEthics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis: A Case Study in Peripheral Trauma with Implications for Health Professionals

Open access
Alsan, Marcella, Wanamaker, Marianne, Hardeman, Rachel R.·2020·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Racially or ethnically targeted events may have adverse health implications for members of the group not directly targeted, a phenomenon known as peripheral trauma. Recent evidence suggests that mass incarceration, police brutality, and immigration actions all have such effects, as did medical exploitation by the US government during the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. We summarize recent findings in the economics literature on population-level effects of the Tuskegee study, including a decline in health-seeking behavior and a rise of both mortality and medical mistrust among African-American men not enrolled in the study. We highlight the relevance of our findings for present-day racial health disparities. Practitioner awareness of peripheral trauma is an important element of cultural competency. But among options to substantially improve minority trust in the healthcare system, the diversification of medical practitioners may hold greatest promise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The focus on oncology further narrowed the range.

    “The focus on oncology further narrowed the range [71–73].”

    From Enablers and barriers of clinical trial participation in adult patients from minority ethnic groups: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Introduction and Discussion address peripheral trauma, the Tuskegee study, and health inequities, not oncology or a range narrowed by an oncology focus. Searches for “oncology” and the claim’s wording found no passage addressing that point in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Novac NL, Geronimus AT, Martinez-Cardoso AM. Change in birth outcomes among infants born to Latina mothers after a major immigra- tion raid. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):839-49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsan, M., Wanamaker, M., & Hardeman, R. R.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Wanamaker, Marianne
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
322-325
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2981897631
Cited by
116
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 8
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R03MD011449)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
Tuskegee syphilis study, racial disparities in health, medical mistrust, health-seeking behavior, African American men, cultural competence, physician workforce diversity
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Syphilis, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review