Cited by 465Health disparities and outcomesEthics in Clinical ResearchRace, Genetics, and Society

Tuskegee and the Health of Black Men*

Open access
Alsan, Marcella, Wanamaker, Marianne·2018·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

For 40 years, the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male passively monitored hundreds of adult black men with syphilis despite the availability of effective treatment. The study’s methods have become synonymous with exploitation and mistreatment by the medical profession. To identify the study’s effects on the behavior and health of older black men, we use an interacted difference-in-difference-in-differences model, comparing older black men to other demographic groups, before and after the Tuskegee revelation, in varying proximity to the study’s victims. We find that the disclosure of the study in 1972 is correlated with increases in medical mistrust and mortality and decreases in both outpatient and inpatient physician interactions for older black men. Our estimates imply life expectancy at age 45 for black men fell by up to 1.5 years in response to the disclosure, accounting for approximately 35% of the 1980 life expectancy gap between black and white men and 25% of the gap between black men and women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjx029

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of trust in public health officials may lead to negative effects on utilization of health services.

    “Conversely, a lack of trust in public health officials may lead to negative effects on utilization of health services 198 .”

    From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [198]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says medical mistrust is more likely to discourage preventive and non-emergency care, and the Conclusion reports lower healthcare utilization among older Black men following the Tuskegee Study’s disclosure. The paper measures trust in doctors and the medical establishment, however, rather than trust in public health officials specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Byrd Michael Clayton Linda A An American Health Care Dilemma: Race Medicine and Healthcare in the United States, 1900–2000, Volume II New York Routledge 2002
  2. U.S. Census Bureau Census of Population and Housing Vol. 1: Characteristics of the Population Washington, D.C. Government Printing Office 1970

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsan, M., & Wanamaker, M.
Affiliations
  • The Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2017-08-02
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
407-455
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2431687448
Cited by
464
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2016: 1
FWCI
24.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG017253)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R03MD011449)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
Tuskegee syphilis study, untreated syphilis, Black men, medical mistrust, life expectancy, racial disparities in health, physician-patient interaction, mortality, older men, sex differences in health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review