Cited by 79Communication and COVID-19 ImpactSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Public Priorities and Concerns Regarding COVID-19 in an Online Discussion Forum: Longitudinal Topic Modeling

Open access
Stokes, Daniel C., Andy, Anietie, Guntuku, Sharath Chandra, Ungar, Lyle H., Merchant, Raina M.·2020·Journal of General Internal Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-020-05889-w

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By providing complementary evidence to observations by Mackey et al and Stokes et al on expressed mental health concerns during the crisis, our study further underscores their findings using a comparable control data set, reinforcing and providing empirical credibility to the impression that the COVID-19 pandemic has indeed caused or contributed directly to the mental health concerns that we描述.

    “By providing complementary evidence to observations by Mackey et al [106] and Stokes et al [107] on expressed (mental health) concerns during the crisis, our study further underscores their findings using a comparable (control) data set, reinforcing and providing empirical credibility to the impression that the COVID-19 pandemic has indeed caused or contributed directly to the mental health concer”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stokes, D. C., Andy, A., Guntuku, S. C., Ungar, L. H., & Merchant, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Stokes, Daniel C.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2020-05-12
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
2244-2247
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W3024303626
Cited by
77
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, public concern, Reddit, online forums, public health measures, pandemic severity, impact on daily life, personal finance, travel restrictions, hand washing, topic modeling, social media discourse, mental health, misinformation, vaccine hesitancy
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Civil Defense, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review