Cited by 174Identification and Quantification in FoodEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Species identification in cell culture: a two-pronged molecular approach

Cooper, Jason K., Sykes, Greg, King, Steve, Cottrill, Karin, Ivanova, Natalia V., Hanner, Robert, Ikonomi, Pranvera·2007·In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal

Abstract

Species identification of cell lines and detection of cross-contamination are crucial for scientific research accuracy and reproducibility. Whereas short tandem repeat profiling offers a solution for a limited number of species, primarily human and mouse, the standard method for species identification of cell lines is enzyme polymorphism. Isoezymology, however, has its own drawbacks; it is cumbersome and the data interpretation is often difficult. Furthermore, the detection sensitivity for cross-contamination is low; it requires large amounts of the contaminant present and cross-contamination within closely related species may go undetected. In this paper, we describe a two-pronged molecular approach that addresses these issues by targeting the mitochondrial genome. First, we developed a multiplex PCR-based assay to rapidly identify the most common cell culture species and quickly detect cross-contaminations among these species. Second, for speciation and identification of a wider variety of cell lines, we amplified and sequenced a 648-bp region, often described as the "barcode region" by using a universal primer mix targeted at conserved sequences of the cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI). This method was challenged with a panel of 67 cell lines from 45 diverse species. Implementation of these assays will accurately determine the species of cell lines and will reduce the problems of misidentification and cross-contamination that plague research efforts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11626-007-9060-2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alexander, D.S.; Sipley, J.D.; Quigley, J.P. Autoactivation of avian urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). A novel mode of initiation of the uPA/plasmin cascade. J Biol Chem 273(13):7457–61; 1998. · DOI
  2. Buehring, G.C.; Eby, E.A.; Eby M.J. Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are Mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 40(7):211–5; 2004. · DOI
  3. Chatterjee, R. Cell biology. Cases of mistaken identity. Science 315(5814):928–31; 2007. · DOI
  4. Cywinska, A.; Hunter, F.F.; Hebert, P.D. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol 20(4):413–24; 2006. · DOI
  5. Farris, A.D.; Koelsch, G.; Pruijn, G.J.; van Venrooij, W.J.; Harley, J.B. Conserved features of Y RNAs revealed by automated phylogenetic secondary structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 27(4):1070–8; 1999. · DOI
  6. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3(5):294–9; 1994.
  7. Harris, N.L.; Gang, D.L.; Quay, S.C.; Poppema, S; Zamecnik, P.C.; Nelson-Rees, W.A.; O’Brien, S.J. Contamination of Hodgkin’s disease cell cultures. Nature 289(5795):228–30; 1981. · DOI
  8. Hay, R.J.; Chen, T.J.; Macy, M.L.; Reid, Y.A. Replay to “Cell, lines and DNA fingerprinting”. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28A:593–594; 1992. · DOI
  9. Hebert, P.D.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270(1512):313–321; 2003a · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hebert, P.D.; Ratnasingham, S.; deWaard, J.R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci 270 Suppl 1:S96–9; 2003b.
  11. Hebert, P.D.; Penton, E.H.; Burns, J.M.; Janzen, D.H.; Hallwachs, W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(41):14812–7; 2004 · DOI
  12. Ivanova, N.V.; deWaard, J.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:992–1002; 2006. · DOI
  13. Ivanova, N.V.; Zemlak, T.S.; Hanner, R.H.; Hebert, P.D.N. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes 7(4):544–548; 2007. · DOI
  14. Kerr, K.C.R.; Stoeckle, M.Y.; Dove, C.J.; Weight, L.A.; Francis, C.M.; Hebert, P.D.N. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4):535–543; 2007. · DOI
  15. Langdon, S.P. Cell culture contamination: an overview. Methods Mol Med 88:309–17; 2004.
  16. Liu, M.Y.; Lin, S.C.; Liu, H.; Candal, F.; Vafai, A. Identification and authentication of animal cell culture by polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA sequencing. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 39(10):424–7; 2003. · DOI
  17. Lorenz, J.G.; Jackson, W.E.; Beck, J.C.; Hanner, R. The problems and promise of DNA barcodes for species diagnosis of primate biomaterials. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1869–77; 2005. · DOI
  18. Marcovici, M.; Prier, J.E.. Enhancement of St. Louis arbovirus plaque formation by neutral red. J Virol 2(3):178–81; 1968. · DOI
  19. Markovic, O.; Markovic, N. Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34(1):1–8; 1998. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Parodi, B.; Aresu, O.; Bini, D.; Lorenzini, R.; Schena, F.; Visconti, P.; Cesaro, M.; Ferrera, D.; Andreotti V.; Ruzzon T. Species identification and confirmation of human and animal cell lines: a PCR-based method. Biotechniques 32(2):432–4, 436, 438–40; 2002. · DOI
  21. Povey, S.; Hopkinson, D.A.; Harris, H.; Franks, L.M. Characterisation of human cell lines and differentiation from HeLa by enzyme typing. Nature 264(5581):60–3; 1976. · DOI
  22. Ratnasingham, S.; Hebert, P. The Barcode of Life Database. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7(3):355–364; 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ryder, O.A.; McLaren, A.; Brenner, S.; Zhang, Y.P.; Benirschke, K. DNA banks for endangered animal species. Science 288(5464):275–7; 2000. · DOI
  24. Sick, C.; Schultz, U.; Munster, U.; Meier, J.; Kaspers, B.; Staeheli, P. Promoter structures and differential responses to viral and nonviral inducers of chicken type I interferon genes. J Biol Chem 273(16):9749–54; 1998. · DOI
  25. Smith, M.A.; Fisher, B.L.; Hebert, P.D. DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1825–34; 2005 · DOI
  26. Stacey, G.N. Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature 403(6768):356; 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Steube, K.G.; Meyer, C.; Uphoff, C.C.; Drexler, H.G. A simple method using beta-globin polymerase chain reaction for the species identification of animal cell lines—a progress report. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 39(10):468–75; 2003. · DOI
  28. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1847–57; 2005. · DOI
  29. Wolf, K.; Burke, C.N.; Quimby, M.C. Duck viral enteritis: microtiter plate isolation and neutralization test using the duck embryo fibroblast cell line. Avian Dis 18(3):427–34; 1974. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, J. K., Sykes, G., King, S., Cottrill, K., Ivanova, N. V., Hanner, R., & Ikonomi, P.
Affiliations
  • American Type Culture Collection (US)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Ikonomi, Pranvera
Venue
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
Published
2007-10-13
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
344-351
ISSN
  • 1071-2690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-706X
OpenAlex
W1907982143
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Genome Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
cross-contamination detection, mitochondrial genome, cytochrome c oxidase I, short tandem repeat profiling, multiplex PCR, cell culture contamination, research reproducibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Electron Transport Complex IV, Humans, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Cell Culture Techniques, K562 Cells, Protein Subunits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review