The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species identification in cell culture: a two-pronged molecular approach
Abstract
Species identification of cell lines and detection of cross-contamination are crucial for scientific research accuracy and reproducibility. Whereas short tandem repeat profiling offers a solution for a limited number of species, primarily human and mouse, the standard method for species identification of cell lines is enzyme polymorphism. Isoezymology, however, has its own drawbacks; it is cumbersome and the data interpretation is often difficult. Furthermore, the detection sensitivity for cross-contamination is low; it requires large amounts of the contaminant present and cross-contamination within closely related species may go undetected. In this paper, we describe a two-pronged molecular approach that addresses these issues by targeting the mitochondrial genome. First, we developed a multiplex PCR-based assay to rapidly identify the most common cell culture species and quickly detect cross-contaminations among these species. Second, for speciation and identification of a wider variety of cell lines, we amplified and sequenced a 648-bp region, often described as the "barcode region" by using a universal primer mix targeted at conserved sequences of the cytochrome C oxidase I gene (COI). This method was challenged with a panel of 67 cell lines from 45 diverse species. Implementation of these assays will accurately determine the species of cell lines and will reduce the problems of misidentification and cross-contamination that plague research efforts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“confirmed that HIBEC cells were originally from rat and C201441 cells were from mouse”
From Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“confirmed that HIBEC cells were originally from rat and C201441 cells were from mouse”
From Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines (2017) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Cooper and colleagues implemented a two-pronged molecular approach in which they combined a multiplex PCR-based assay to identify the most common cell culture species and a protocol for sequencing of a 648 bp region located in the cytochrome C oxidase I (COI) gene, i.e., the “barcode region”, that accurately determines the species of cell lines [69].”
From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly
Masters, J. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc775 · Cited by 560
Cross-contamination of cells in culture
Nelson-Rees, W. A., Daniels, D. W., & Flandermeyer, R. R. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6451928 · Cited by 329
Chapter 4 Cell Culture Contamination: Sources, Consequences, Prevention, and Elimination
Lincoln, C. K., & Gabridge, M. G. (1998) · Methods in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61571-x · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Alexander, D.S.; Sipley, J.D.; Quigley, J.P. Autoactivation of avian urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA). A novel mode of initiation of the uPA/plasmin cascade. J Biol Chem 273(13):7457–61; 1998. · DOI
- Buehring, G.C.; Eby, E.A.; Eby M.J. Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are Mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 40(7):211–5; 2004. · DOI
- Chatterjee, R. Cell biology. Cases of mistaken identity. Science 315(5814):928–31; 2007. · DOI
- Cywinska, A.; Hunter, F.F.; Hebert, P.D. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med Vet Entomol 20(4):413–24; 2006. · DOI
- Farris, A.D.; Koelsch, G.; Pruijn, G.J.; van Venrooij, W.J.; Harley, J.B. Conserved features of Y RNAs revealed by automated phylogenetic secondary structure analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 27(4):1070–8; 1999. · DOI
- Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3(5):294–9; 1994.
- Harris, N.L.; Gang, D.L.; Quay, S.C.; Poppema, S; Zamecnik, P.C.; Nelson-Rees, W.A.; O’Brien, S.J. Contamination of Hodgkin’s disease cell cultures. Nature 289(5795):228–30; 1981. · DOI
- Hay, R.J.; Chen, T.J.; Macy, M.L.; Reid, Y.A. Replay to “Cell, lines and DNA fingerprinting”. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28A:593–594; 1992. · DOI
- Hebert, P.D.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270(1512):313–321; 2003a · DOI · Paper page
- Hebert, P.D.; Ratnasingham, S.; deWaard, J.R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci 270 Suppl 1:S96–9; 2003b.
- Hebert, P.D.; Penton, E.H.; Burns, J.M.; Janzen, D.H.; Hallwachs, W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(41):14812–7; 2004 · DOI
- Ivanova, N.V.; deWaard, J.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:992–1002; 2006. · DOI
- Ivanova, N.V.; Zemlak, T.S.; Hanner, R.H.; Hebert, P.D.N. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Notes 7(4):544–548; 2007. · DOI
- Kerr, K.C.R.; Stoeckle, M.Y.; Dove, C.J.; Weight, L.A.; Francis, C.M.; Hebert, P.D.N. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4):535–543; 2007. · DOI
- Langdon, S.P. Cell culture contamination: an overview. Methods Mol Med 88:309–17; 2004.
- Liu, M.Y.; Lin, S.C.; Liu, H.; Candal, F.; Vafai, A. Identification and authentication of animal cell culture by polymerase chain reaction amplification and DNA sequencing. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 39(10):424–7; 2003. · DOI
- Lorenz, J.G.; Jackson, W.E.; Beck, J.C.; Hanner, R. The problems and promise of DNA barcodes for species diagnosis of primate biomaterials. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1869–77; 2005. · DOI
- Marcovici, M.; Prier, J.E.. Enhancement of St. Louis arbovirus plaque formation by neutral red. J Virol 2(3):178–81; 1968. · DOI
- Markovic, O.; Markovic, N. Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34(1):1–8; 1998. · DOI · Paper page
- Parodi, B.; Aresu, O.; Bini, D.; Lorenzini, R.; Schena, F.; Visconti, P.; Cesaro, M.; Ferrera, D.; Andreotti V.; Ruzzon T. Species identification and confirmation of human and animal cell lines: a PCR-based method. Biotechniques 32(2):432–4, 436, 438–40; 2002. · DOI
- Povey, S.; Hopkinson, D.A.; Harris, H.; Franks, L.M. Characterisation of human cell lines and differentiation from HeLa by enzyme typing. Nature 264(5581):60–3; 1976. · DOI
- Ratnasingham, S.; Hebert, P. The Barcode of Life Database. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7(3):355–364; 2007. · DOI · Paper page
- Ryder, O.A.; McLaren, A.; Brenner, S.; Zhang, Y.P.; Benirschke, K. DNA banks for endangered animal species. Science 288(5464):275–7; 2000. · DOI
- Sick, C.; Schultz, U.; Munster, U.; Meier, J.; Kaspers, B.; Staeheli, P. Promoter structures and differential responses to viral and nonviral inducers of chicken type I interferon genes. J Biol Chem 273(16):9749–54; 1998. · DOI
- Smith, M.A.; Fisher, B.L.; Hebert, P.D. DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1825–34; 2005 · DOI
- Stacey, G.N. Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature 403(6768):356; 2000. · DOI · Paper page
- Steube, K.G.; Meyer, C.; Uphoff, C.C.; Drexler, H.G. A simple method using beta-globin polymerase chain reaction for the species identification of animal cell lines—a progress report. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 39(10):468–75; 2003. · DOI
- Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1462):1847–57; 2005. · DOI
- Wolf, K.; Burke, C.N.; Quimby, M.C. Duck viral enteritis: microtiter plate isolation and neutralization test using the duck embryo fibroblast cell line. Avian Dis 18(3):427–34; 1974. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL.
Ward, R., Hanner, R., & Hebert, P. (2009) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x · Cited by 981
“…# 2009 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles, Journal of Fish Biology 2009, 74, 329–356 validate the identity of animal cell lines (Lorenz et al., 2005; Cooper et al., 2007) and is a recommended characterization step for materials in biodiversity repositories (Hanner & Gregory, 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCheck your cultures! A list of cross‐contaminated or misidentified cell lines
Capes‐Davis, A., Theodosopoulos, G., Atkin, I., Drexler, H. G., Kohara, A., MacLeod, R. A. F., Masters, J. R., Nakamura, Y., Reid, Y. A., Reddel, R. R., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.25242 · Cited by 520
Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research
Geraghty, R. J., Capes-Davis, A., Davis, J. M., Downward, J., Freshney, R. I., Knezevic, I., Lovell-Badge, R., Masters, J. R. W., Meredith, J., Stacey, G. N., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.166 · Cited by 464
“Periodic audits for evidence of regular maintenance, monitoring and stock control will also help ensure safety and security of storage facilities.”
BackgroundMethodA resource for cell line authentication, annotation and quality control
Yu, M., Selvaraj, S. K., Liang-Chu, M. M. Y., Aghajani, S., Busse, M., Yuan, J., Lee, G., Peale, F., Klijn, C., Bourgon, R., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14397 · Cited by 225
Laurier, W. (2011) · doi:10.1111/(issn)1365-2095 · Cited by 191
“2003) and has been successfully used to identify many other cell lines (Lorenz et al. 2005; Cooper et al. 2007).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, J. K., Sykes, G., King, S., Cottrill, K., Ivanova, N. V., Hanner, R., & Ikonomi, P.
- Affiliations
- American Type Culture Collection (US)
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ikonomi, Pranvera
- ORCID
- Hanner, Robert
- Venue
- In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
- Published
- 2007-10-13
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 344-351
- ISSN
- 1071-2690 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-706X
- OpenAlex
- W1907982143
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Genome Canada
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Keywords
- cross-contamination detection, mitochondrial genome, cytochrome c oxidase I, short tandem repeat profiling, multiplex PCR, cell culture contamination, research reproducibility
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electron Transport Complex IV, Humans, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Cell Culture Techniques, K562 Cells, Protein Subunits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review