Cited by 565Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsBiomedical Ethics and RegulationAnimal testing and alternatives

HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly

Masters, John R.·2002·Nature Reviews Cancer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc775

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masters, J. R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Masters, John R.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2002-04
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
315-319
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2070468167
Cited by
560
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 18
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
Keywords
HeLa cells, human cancer cell lines, cervical cancer, immortalized cell lines, scientific fraud, cell line authentication, history of cancer research
MeSH terms
Cytogenetics, Female, HeLa Cells, Humans, Research Design, Time Factors, Tumor Cells, Cultured

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review