Cited by 40Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Prediction of Whole-Body and Segmental Body Composition by Bioelectrical Impedance in Morbidly Obese Subjects

Open access
Jiménez, Amanda, Omaña, Wilberto, Flores, Lílliam, Coves, María José, Bellido, Diego, Perea, Verónica, Vidal, Josep·2012·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Validated equations for body composition analysis using bioelectrical impedance (BIA) in morbidly obese (MO) subjects are scarce. Thus, our aim was todevelop new equations from physical and BIA parameters to estimate whole-body and segmental body composition inMO subjects, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) as the reference method.Methods A cross-sectional study on 159 Caucasian MO subjects (female 78%, age 43.5 ± 11.8 years, BMI 45.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2) divided in two groups was conducted: model building cohort (n = 110) and model validation cohort (n 0 49). Stepwise regression analysis was used to develop specific fat free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) equations.Results Gender, body weight, and height2/impedance accounted, respectively, for 89.4% (p < 0.001) and 89.3% (p < 0.001) of the variability of DXA-total FFM in the two cohorts. Using the new equation, the mean difference between the DXA-FFM and BIA-FFM estimates was +0.180 kg (95% CI: -0.34 to +0.7 kg, p 0 NS), and the resulting limits of agreement were +6.76 and −6.40 kg. Similarly, good estimates of DXA truncal-, android-, and gynoid-FM from anthropometric and BIA parameters could be obtained from weight, height2/impedance, and waist and hip circumferences (respectively, R2 adjusted: 0.657, 0.776, and 0.770; p < 0.001).Conclusions The new equations derived from physical and BIA parameters provide accurate estimates of body composition in MO subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-011-0570-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiménez, A., Omaña, W., Flores, L., Coves, M. J., Bellido, D., Perea, V., & Vidal, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (ES)
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (ES)
Corresponding author
Jiménez, Amanda
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
587-593
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2050428815
Cited by
40
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNA. Repositorio Institucional del Sergas (Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
morbid obesity, body composition
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Predictive Value of Tests, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review