Cited by 127Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Predictors of Attrition in Bariatric Aftercare: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Moroshko, Irina, Brennan, Leah, O’Brien, Paul·2012·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Bariatric surgery results in greater weight loss and maintenance than non-surgical interventions in obese patients. Inadequate adherence to aftercare is associated with poor weight loss and maintenance, poorer control of obesity-related comorbidities, and the development of post-operative complications. This study aims to identify factors influencing failure to attend follow-up visits in the adult post-bariatric surgery patients. A systematic review was undertaken to identify factors associated with attrition from bariatric aftercare in adult (18-65 years) obese (BMI > 30) patients. Eight studies published before May 2011 and addressing factors associated with bariatric aftercare attendance were identified. Few consistent findings were evident. Greater pre-surgical weight and greater travel distance to the follow-up centre were more commonly associated with attrition. Conclusions were limited by the very small number of studies, the different types of bariatric surgery studied and the variety of methodologies employed and variables considered. There is a need for research identifying the modifiable attrition risk factors that can be targeted to improve surgical aftercare attendance. This has the potential to facilitate long-term weight loss and maintanence as well as to reduce post-operative complications and costs; thus improving both the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-012-0691-3

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moroshko, I., Brennan, L., & O’Brien, P.
Affiliations
The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Brennan, Leah
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2012-06-14
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1640-1647
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2137725535
Cited by
127
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, follow-up care
MeSH terms
Aftercare, Australia, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review