Impact of Patient Attrition From Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes
Abstract
Background Obesity has become a global epidemic. Bariatric surgery remains the most successful modality for producing sustained weight loss. Attrition rates after bariatric surgery are currently reported between 3 and 63% depending on the type of bariatric operation and the length of follow-up provided by the bariatric surgery team. It is currently unknown if patient attrition from bariatric surgery programs impact clinical outcomes. The availability of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) and the Mayo Clinic Midwest unified electronic medical record (EMR) provide a unique opportunity to explore this topic.Methods Raw data was downloaded from MBSAQIP database for all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases between May 1, 2008 and January 8, 2015 (N = 1242). Baseline weight and preexisting comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were recorded using the MBSAQIP database and the EMR. Current weight and comorbidity data (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were subsequently collected at the time closest to the patient's surgical anniversary dates during the following assessment periods: years 1, 2, and 3 after surgery. Mean percentage total weight loss (TWL) was calculated at each time frame for each patient. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics, including counts and percentages for categorical variables by either year or year and location.Results The number of patients seen by the bariatric surgery practice (BSP) compared to those seen by other providers within our practice (attrition to bariatric surgery practice (ABSP)) was highest in year 1 and reduced each subsequent year (year 1: BSP N = 740, ABSP N = 166, year 2: BSP N = 425, ABSP N = 309, and year 3: BSP N = 235, ABSP N = 325). The mean TWL in the BSP and ABSP groups at year 1 was 31.84% versus 30.19%, at year 2 was 31.34% versus 29.67%, and at year 3 was 29.01% versus 27.71% respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups at years 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was not found in year 3 despite a trend towards higher TWL in the BSP group. Among all patients, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed between baseline and years 1, 2, and 3 for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.Conclusions Our study confirms the problem of patient attrition to follow up at our BSP. It is also the first to suggest a difference in weight loss outcomes among patients seen in BSP compared to those seen by other providers (ABSP) at 1 and 2 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The potential implications of this observation on long-term weight maintenance after LRYGB and the impact on metabolic comorbidities remain unknown but warrant further investigation. It also warrants the development of strategies to improve patient retention in BSP and/or engagement of medical providers to achieve that end.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Long-term engagement with bariatric team support diminishes over time, leading to less opportunity for intervention when needed.
“Surveys have shown that long-term engagement with bariatric team support diminishes over time, leading to less opportunity for intervention when needed (40, 41).”
From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes — 5-Year Outcomes
Schauer, P. R., Bhatt, D. L., Kirwan, J. P., Wolski, K., Aminian, A., Brethauer, S. A., Navaneethan, S. D., Singh, R. P., Pothier, C. E., Nissen, S. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1600869 · Cited by 2,934 · see citing works
Chang, S.-H., Stoll, C. R. T., Song, J., Varela, J. E., Eagon, C. J., & Colditz, G. A. (2014) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654 · Cited by 1,688 · see citing works
Weight and Metabolic Outcomes 12 Years after Gastric Bypass
Adams, T. D., Davidson, L. E., Litwin, S. E., Kim, J., Kolotkin, R. L., Nanjee, M. N., Gutierrez, J. M., Frogley, S. J., Ibele, A. R., Brinton, E. A., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1700459 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Pontiroli, A. E., Fossati, A., Vedani, P., Fiorilli, M., Folli, F. B., Paganelli, M., Marchi, M., & Maffei, C. (2007) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9428-8 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass
Gould, J. C., Beverstein, G., Reinhardt, S., & Garren, M. J. (2007) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2007.07.005 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Predictors of Attrition in Bariatric Aftercare: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Moroshko, I., Brennan, L., & O’Brien, P. (2012) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0691-3 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery
Wheeler, E., Prettyman, A., Lenhard, M. J., & Tran, K. (2008) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2008.01.013 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Lack of Adherence to Follow-Up Visits After Bariatric Surgery: Reasons and Outcome
Vidal, P., Ramón, J. M., Goday, A., Parri, A., Crous, X., Trillo, L., Pera, M., & Grande, L. (2013) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1094-9 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Lara, M. D., Baker, M. T., Larson, C. J., Mathiason, M. A., Lambert, P. J., & Kothari, S. N. (2005) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2004.11.001 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Attendance at Clinical Visits Predicts Weight Loss After Gastric Bypass Surgery
Compher, C. W., Hanlon, A. L., Kang, Y., Elkin, L., & Williams, N. N. (2011) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0577-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients
McVay, M. A., Friedman, K. E., Applegate, K. L., & Portenier, D. D. (2013) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.005 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Sivagnanam, P., & Rhodes, M. (2010) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0970-9 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
DeNino, W. F., Osler, T. M., Evans, E. G., & Forgione, P. M. (2010) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.008 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Miller, B. M. L., Murphy, K. D., O’Brien, P. E., & Brennan, L. (2015) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1814-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Rijswijk, A.-S., van Olst, N., Schats, W., van der Peet, D. L., & van de Laar, A. W. (2021) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-021-05394-x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery
Ames, G. E., Koball, A. M., & Clark, M. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.934680 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Surveys have shown that long-term engagement with bariatric team support diminishes over time, leading to less opportunity for intervention when needed (40, 41).”
Background
- Authors
- Jurgensen, J. A., Reidt, W., Kellogg, T., Mundi, M., Shah, M., & Collazo Clavell, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jurgensen, Julia A.
- Venue
- Obesity Surgery
- Published
- 2018-11-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 579-584
- ISSN
- 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2898691917
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Keywords
- bariatric surgery, patient dropout
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aftercare, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Medicine, Quality Improvement, Lost to Follow-Up
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review