Cited by 54Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Predictors of Postoperative Aftercare Attrition among Gastric Bypass Patients

Open access
Khorgami, Zhamak, Zhang, Chi, Messiah, Sarah E., de la Cruz-Muñoz, Nestor·2015·Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care

Abstract

Background: Poor adherence to post-bariatric surgery aftercare continues to challenge surgical practices. The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict poor aftercare attendance among patients who underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery. Method: A retrospective medical chart review of patients who underwent RYGB from 2002 to 2011 was conducted. Patients with four visits or more in the first 2 years (>50%) were categorized as “acceptable follow-up” and with ≤50% as “poor follow-up.” Demographics, presurgical body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities were compared using multivariate analysis. Results: Out of 2,658 patients, 1,092 (41.1%) had acceptable follow-up. Preoperative factors that predicted acceptable follow-up included female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.72]), older age (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.03–1.04]), higher BMI at surgery (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01–1.03]), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.15–1.72]). Conversely, presence of diabetes mellitus (OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.39–0.88]), hypertension (OR 0.53 [95% CI 0.39–0.72]), and obstructive sleep apnea (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.26–0.57]) predicted less adherence to RYGB aftercare. Conclusion: These findings suggest RYGB patients' age, gender, ethnicity, preoperative BMI, and certain comorbidities should be considered to maximize postoperative aftercare attendance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/bari.2014.0053

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-operative diagnosis of depression was predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”

    From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    In the Results (page not available), preoperative depression was more common among patients with poor follow-up over the first two years (10.4%) than among those with acceptable follow-up (5.8%). However, depression was not an independent predictor in the paper’s multivariate analysis, so describing it as predictive overstates this study’s finding. The three-study wording refers to the sentence’s multiple citations, not to three studies in this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High levels of pre-operative depressive symptomology were predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”

    From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that higher Beck Depression Inventory scores were associated with aftercare attrition in other studies. It does not establish that this association concerned missed appointments specifically within 24 months; in this paper’s own Results (page unavailable), depression was more frequent among patients with poor follow-up but was not identified as an independent predictor. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A history of pharmacological treatment of depression was predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”

    From Psychological predictors of adherence to lifestyle changes after bariatric surgery: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    In the Results (Table 1), depression was more common among patients with poor follow-up during the first two years after gastric bypass. The paper does not identify a history of pharmacological depression treatment as a predictor, and depression is absent from its multivariate predictor table (Table 2). This source is one study, not evidence for the claim about three studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. comes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:503-513.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khorgami, Z., Zhang, C., Messiah, S. E., & de la Cruz-Muñoz, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Department of Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Venue
Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care
Published
2015-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
79-83
ISSN
  • 2168-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-0248
OpenAlex
W1862338193
Cited by
54
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, postoperative follow-up, bariatric surgery, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, Hispanic origin, sex differences, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review