Cited by 102Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

MILEPOST Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: 12-Month Weight Loss and Satiety Outcomes After pose SM vs. Medical Therapy

Miller, Karl, Turró, R., Greve, J. W., Bakker, C. M., Buchwald, J. N., Espinós, J. C.·2017·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Background Pose SM is an endolumenal weight-loss intervention in which suture anchors are placed endoscopically in the gastric fundus/distal gastric body. Observational studies of pose have shown safe, effective weight loss. Twelve-month results of a randomized controlled trial comparing weight loss and satiety after pose vs. conventional medical therapy are reported.Methods Subjects with classes I-II obesity were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to pose or diet/exercise guidance only (control). Pose subjects received gastric fundus and distal body suture-anchor plications with diet/exercise counseling. Total body (%TBWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL) were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze 12-month %TBWL. Satiety changes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.Results From November 2013 to July 2014, 44 subjects were randomized (34, 77.3 % female; mean age, 38.3 ± 10.7 years; body mass index, 36.5 ± 3.4 kg/m 2) to pose (n = 34) or control (n = 10) groups in three centers. Mean pose procedure time was 51.8 ± 14.5 min; pose subjects received a mean 8.8 ± 1.3 fundal and 4.2 ± 0.7 distal body plications. Twelve-month TBWL: pose, 13.0 % (EWL, 45.0 %), n = 30 vs. control group, 5.3 % (18.1 %), n = 9; significant mean difference, 7.7 % (95 % CI 2.2, 13.2; p < 0.01). Pose subjects showed significant reductions in satiety parameters (p < 0.001); controls experienced reduced caloric intake and satiety volume (p < 0.05). No serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred.Conclusions In a randomized controlled trial at 12 months, pose-treated subjects had significantly greater weight loss than those treated with diet/exercise guidance alone. At 6 and 12 months, pose subjects showed significant reduction in satiety parameters.Study registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier # NCT01843231.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-016-2295-9

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, K., Turró, R., Greve, J. W., Bakker, C. M., Buchwald, J. N., & Espinós, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Quirón Teknon (ES)
  • Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL)
Corresponding author
Miller, Karl
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
310-322
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2476724090
Cited by
102
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
USGI Medical-only for manuscript development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Diet, Reducing, Endoscopy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Satiation, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery, Young Adult, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review