Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Are the effects of cognitive behavior therapy for severe fatigue in cancer survivors sustained up to 14 years after therapy?

Open access
Van Gessel, Lidewij D., Abrahams, Harriët J. G., Prinsen, Hetty, Bleijenberg, Gijs, Heins, Marianne, Twisk, Jos, Van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M., Verhagen, Stans C. A. H. H. V. M. +2 more·2018·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) reduces cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in cancer survivors in the short term. We examined fatigue levels up to 14 years after CBT. METHODS: Eligible participants of two randomized controlled trials who had completed CBT for CRF and a post-treatment assessment were contacted (n = 81). Fatigue was assessed with the subscale "fatigue severity" of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-fatigue). The course of fatigue over time was examined with linear mixed model analyses. Fatigue levels of participants were compared to matched population controls at long-term follow-up. We tested with multiple regression analysis if fatigue at follow-up was predicted by the patients' fatigue level and fatigue-perpetuating factors directly after CBT (post-CBT). RESULTS: Seventy-eight persons completed a follow-up assessment (response rate = 96%, mean time after CBT = 10 years). The mean level of fatigue increased from 23.7 (SD = 11.1) at post-CBT to 34.4 (SD = 12.4) at follow-up (p < 0.001). Population controls (M = 23,9, SD = 11.4) reported lower fatigue levels than participants. Half of the patients (52%) who were recovered from severe fatigue at post-CBT (CIS-fatigue < 35) were still recovered at long-term follow-up. Patients with lower fatigue levels at post-CBT were less likely to show relapse. CONCLUSION: Despite initial improvement after CBT, levels of fatigue deteriorated over time. Half of the patients who were recovered from severe fatigue after CBT still scored within normal ranges of fatigue at long-term follow-up. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: It should be explored how to help patients with a relapse of severe fatigue following an initially successful CBT. They may profit from CBT again, or another evidence-based intervention for fatigue (like mindfulness or exercise therapy). Future research to gain insight into reasons for relapse is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-018-0690-z

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Gessel, L. D., Abrahams, H. J. G., Prinsen, H., Bleijenberg, G., Heins, M., Twisk, J., Van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Verhagen, S. C. A. H. H. V. M., Gielissen, M. F. M., & Knoop, H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Knoop, Hans
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2018-04-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
519-527
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W2796731404
Cited by
19
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Academic Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, cancer-related fatigue, cancer survivors, long-term follow-up, fatigue recovery, Checklist Individual Strength, mindfulness, exercise therapy
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Fatigue, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review