Cited by 30Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Long-term follow-up after cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Janse, Anthonie, Nikolaus, Stephanie, Wiborg, Jan F., Heins, Marianne, van der Meer, Jos W.M., Bleijenberg, Gijs, Tummers, Marcia, Twisk, Jos +1 more·2017·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Main aim was to determine whether treatment effects were maintained up to 10years after treatment.Methods Participants (n=583) of previously published studies on the effects of CBT for CFS were contacted for a long-term follow-up assessment. They completed questionnaires on main outcomes fatigue severity (CIS) and physical functioning (SF-36). The course of these outcomes since post-treatment assessment was examined using mixed model analyses.Results Between 21 and 125months after finishing CBT, 511 persons (response rate 88%) completed a follow-up assessment. At follow-up, mean fatigue severity was significantly increased to 37.60 (SD=12.76) and mean physical functioning significantly decreased to 73.16 (SD=23.56) compared to post-treatment assessment. At follow-up still 37% of the participants had fatigue scores in the normal range and 70% were not impaired in physical functioning.Conclusion Positive effects of CBT for CFS on fatigue and physical functioning were partly sustained at long-term follow-up. However, a subgroup of patients once again reported severe fatigue, and compromised physical functioning. Further research should elucidate the reasons for this deterioration to facilitate the development of treatment strategies for relapse prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.016

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janse, A., Nikolaus, S., Wiborg, J. F., Heins, M., van der Meer, J. W. M., Bleijenberg, G., Tummers, M., Twisk, J., & Knoop, H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Knoop, Hans
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
97
Pages
45-51
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603667634
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Radboud Universiteit
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy, long-term follow-up, treatment effects, fatigue severity, physical function, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review