Cited by 72Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

A German version of the Insomnia Severity Index: Validation and identification of a cut-off to detect insomnia

Dieck, Arne, Morin, Charles M., Backhaus, Jutta·2018·Somnologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11818-017-0147-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dieck, A., Morin, C. M., & Backhaus, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Somnologie
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
27-35
ISSN
  • 1432-9123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-054X
OpenAlex
W2781983995
Cited by
72
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
Insomnia Severity Index, German translation, insomnia, psychometric properties, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, cut-off values, symptom severity assessment, sleep quality, depression, stress reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review